Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, and since there are no actual traditions in government sanctioned marriage, I think it’s time we had a robust discussion as to what marriage is and should be.
I’ll start: the civil contract called marriage is limited in its participation to 2 individuals. Now, in the past, the reason for this limitation, which seems exclusive to marriage for some odd reason, was obvious because those two being married comprised of the two demographic groups that, well, make babies.
But now, seeing that two same sex gays, or for that matter, two straights of the same sex can join in marriage, why the limitation of only two? Clearly same sex couples, regardless of sexuality, can’t create offspring.
And I continue to search for another civil contract that limit the number of participants to only two.
latesthunts.com
www.wallstreetoasis.com
www.redletterchristians.org
Being anti-groomer is not anti-LGBT and to say otherwise is homophobic.
Glad to see the leftists celebrating sin. Good little Satanists. Gonna keep Ol' Nick busy shoveling coal.Another win for the good guys. That so many are pissed off about it from the right is just extra credit and running up the score.
Glad to see the leftists celebrating sin. Good little Satanists. Gonna keep Ol' Nick busy shoveling coal.
Another win for the good guys. That so many are pissed off about it from the right is just extra credit and running up the score.
The production of babies is a by-product of marriage, not the point of it. I say this because there has never been a requirement that both parties in a marriage be capable of reproducing. Whether age (menopause), or illness has robbed one party or the other of the ability to reproduce, they have still been welcomed into matrimony.
The ghettos if they had a chance to be reduced will never now. They will get worse.The production of babies is a by-product of marriage, not the point of it. I say this because there has never been a requirement that both parties in a marriage be capable of reproducing. Whether age (menopause), or illness has robbed one party or the other of the ability to reproduce, they have still been welcomed into matrimony.
Oooh a pretend marriage thingy
But just think: Now that marriage is no longer a sacred institution, I can marry one of my guns and have that "son of a gun" I keep hearing about.
I'll name him "Shootey McBangy." He'll be a real pistol when he grows up.
"Sacred" being defined as "connected with God (or the gods) or dedicated to a religious purpose and so deserving veneration" and "religious rather than secular."
Please feel free to fill me in as to specifically which religion gives its blessings to same sex marriage or other such faggotry.
I will eagerly await. And please don't try to refer me to various denominations of Christianity which have come to condone same sex marriage. They aren't really following what their Bibles are teaching.
I type it over and over because it is just that. It keeps men at a higher percentage responsible for the children they produce. Over the decades more and more women have made the government their sugar daddies as the children daddies took a flyer. The ghettos are proof and there is a lot more.A "sacred institution"?
Marriage like abortion is not a federal matter. And I was against DOMA for the same reason.
Gays who think this law is good should read this:
---Being married sucks---
Wow... being married sucks
One of my frat bros who graduated college 2 years ago is married. He married his high school sweetheart last year, at age 23. I went to his wedding, the girl was pretty hot (she
---Marriage Sucks---
Marriage Sucks
When the Prog derive totalitarian government has complete control and poverty has increased in huge numbers, they will push traditional marriage in a stringent way. The old way was with freedom. This way we will be living under draconian laws.As soon as the Fed Govt removes all benefits tied to marriage I would agree with you.
So, I guess SCOTUS legalizing faghadist marriage 10 freaking years ago was just an illusion.
When the Prog derive totalitarian government has complete control and poverty has increased in huge numbers, they will push traditional marriage in a stringent way. The old way was with freedom. This way we will be living under draconian laws.
As soon as the Fed Govt removes all benefits tied to marriage I would agree with you.
