Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True, but with the speed our current society is accepting of redefining just about anything these days?If one party is considered property, then it is not a marriage. We have moved beyond a spouse being property. At least I hope we have.
The real property is anyone who works having taxes extruded from them for irresponsible people. And this is different than traditional families with tax breaks saving several hundred dollars with children.If one party is considered property, then it is not a marriage. We have moved beyond a spouse being property. At least I hope we have.
Being anti-groomer is not anti-LGBT and to say otherwise is homophobic.
Person claims to be a dog and claims it gave him consent.As soon as you can show informed consent from the dog, sure.
No I married a bitch and not making that mistake again. Anyway you loons has made marriage a joke.Perhaps what you're saying is that yours never meant anything if some government action can render the institution "obsolete".
No, your assumption that one transgender person doing something illegal makes them all guilty is what is wrong.
True, but with the speed our current society is accepting of redefining just about anything these days?
So have you come up yet with another civil contract that limits the number of participants to two, other than marriage?
I’ve been racking my brains and can’t come up with a single one?
You suppose there was a reason for this?
The real property is anyone who works having taxes extruded from them for irresponsible people. And this is different than traditional families with tax breaks saving several hundred dollars with children.
No I married a bitch and not making that mistake again. Anyway you loons has made marriage a joke.
After the current SCTOUS proved that no ruling is safe, this was a good move by all those that actually believe in equal rights.
This shit is just political theater, if SCOTUS decides to revisit faghadist marriage and return it to the States, this puny law would be stricken at the same time. Just as any law the commies would try to pass regarding abortion would be an exercise in futility.
It just opens the door for people to be able to marry anything. Which will make it a joke.I've been married twice. Neither time was a joke.
Same sex marriages and interracial marriages have no effect on your marriage unless you marry some of the same sex or of a different race. Period.
I can't think of one either. But I also can't think of a single, nonreligious, reason why same sex and interracial marriages would not be recognized by the gov't.
It just opens the door for people to be able to marry anything. Which will make it a joke.
You're proving my point.Or any number of people. Can a bisexual truly be happy in a marriage limited to only two?
I can't think of one either. But I also can't think of a single, nonreligious, reason why same sex and interracial marriages would not be recognized by the gov't.
I meant too.You're proving my point.
That is not the reason for all this, these people want all those benefits the government gives married people. The "get government out of marriage" is my view, not that of some group out there.
There is no reason at all for same sex couples not to be able to have a civil marriage and receive all the things the government gives the rest of us married couples.
So damn tired of all you bigots thinking that two dudes getting married will some how have an effect on your marriage. If it does, the problem is with you, not with them.
