BrokeLoser
Diamond Member
Being anti-groomer is not anti-LGBT and to say otherwise is homophobic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being anti-groomer is not anti-LGBT and to say otherwise is homophobic.
Stop paying for the illegitimate children in every way including free meals in schools totally and we got a deal. The war on poverty has made those who are honest near impoverished.Then remove the tax breaks for every married couple without children under the age of 18.
I can't think of one either. But I also can't think of a single, nonreligious, reason why same sex and interracial marriages would not be recognized by the gov't.
A "sacred" institution with a 50% failure rateBut just think: Now that marriage is no longer a sacred institution, I can marry one of my guns and have that "son of a gun" I keep hearing about.
It just opens the door for people to be able to marry anything. Which will make it a joke.
Why bring interracial into it, surely a man is a man, and a woman is a woman, regardless of skin color, and for that matter, sexuality.
I suppose the reasoning was to make coed bowling leagues easier to organize?
Or it could be that, it takes a mixture of a man and a woman combined to create a third life, regardless of the sexuality of the two.
Makes perfect sense to me
Or any number of people. Can a bisexual truly be happy in a marriage limited to only two?
what are you, Mahmood Ahmadinejad? lolOh I'm pretty sure all those same sex marriages will decrease that failure rate. You betcha.
Nope, it has a direct bearing on society in general. It was a direct assault on the morality of the country, and just look where it has led us. The fact is there was no discrimination against faghadist, they were treated just like every other man or woman under the law.
.
Stop paying for the illegitimate children in every way including free meals in schools totally and we got a deal. The war on poverty has made those who are honest near impoverished.
If I am not mistaken, the bill was confirming both same sex marriages and interracial marriages.
Yes, but there was no real outcry to end interracial. It was for show purposes only.
If it is just about sex, they can have an open marriage.
Or to make sure it stayed in place.
Nice! And if gay marriage was all about sex, which is the claim, then they could have easily done the same, right?
Way to prove my point!
Can you cite this outcry for the end of interracial marriage?
As Paul Harvey said so eloquently, "And now for the rest of the story."
.
Nope, it has a direct bearing on society in general. It was a direct assault on the morality of the country, and just look where it has led us. The fact is there was no discrimination against faghadist, they were treated just like every other man or woman under the law.
A "sacred" institution with a 50% failure rate