- Thread starter
- #81
Yeah I’m sure that plays a big role in it.I think one reason why most women don't run for public office is that it is so all consuming. Running for and being in office is a 24/7 job, essentially, and most women have other responsibilities (family basically). If you look at the men who are in office, they all have a spouse supporting them: the woman behind the man as it were. Women's husbands are usually involved in their own careers and do not give such complete support to a wife in office as they don't have the time. So, she is still responsible for looking after the family (the female role in society) and she is not getting 100% support from her spouse.I won’t get into why there aren’t more women in office except by saying that not enough women even try to run for office in the first place. I think this is something feminists do not want to admit.
However.
We DEFINITELY need more women in public office. They are just as capable of handling the job as men. And more importantly, they - on average - have personality traits that men often lack on average.
1) They are more willing to comprise across the aisle. Women in Committee in congress have demonstrated this ability over men.
2) They also are more empathetic both on an emotional level and a cognitive level. They are more willing to be sympathetic to the plight of the poor and shrinking middle class. Moreover, they have the fairness of mind to consider an opposing perspective which in turn contributes to their ability to compromise.
3) They don’t have the egos men often have.
4) Oh, and for the most part, they aren’t sex perverts.
Again, I stress, these observations are ON AVERAGE. Obviously a lot of men have these attributes just as a lot of women lack them.