Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama himself was admittedly tutored by Frank Marshall Davis, a prominent communist. He studied socialist Saul Alinsky and even quoted from Slinsky's book, Rules for Radicals, during his first inauguration speech. You may have sealed almost every personal record in existence, but he openly talked about these relationships and how anti-American, hate-spewing, racist Pastor Jeremiah Wright was his mentor.Compromised?
You mean like Democrats taking Millions from the Russians, taking thousands of unreported shares of Russian stock, of working for the KGB bank and the Russian spy agency?
Bwuhahaha...
What I find hilarious is that the most prominent demcrat politicians have ties to communist front groups and take money from globalists like Tom Steyer and George Soros and the leftard clown posse here are absolutely oblivious to that very salient fact.
The fact that their connections to Russians now being exposed should not be a shock to anyone.
Was it not Obama, when he thought his microphone was off, who told Medvedev to pass on to Putin that he would be more 'flexible' after his reelection was over?
As then, Democrats true selves are being revealed, even now my other Democrats.
yeah, Hillary was so good for them, I wonder what dump promised them!We do know that Russia already bought Hillary, so why would they want to help Trump?no it hasn't, those involved all pleaded the fifth. so you are strangely wrong.So you think that a work of fiction becomes factual if only one detail of the work is true??The dossier said he was early last year. That was later shown to be true. That's called corroboration.
Damn. Yah learn something new every day.
So if Harry Potter is from the UK, which actually exists, then Hogwarts exists? Shit, I'm still waiting on my letter. Bastards.
The dossier was raw intelligence. Raw intelligence requires verification. That has happened for a portion of it.
It has, dope. We don't need testimony to know that Russia did indeed influence our election with hacked emails and fake internet ads and they did so to aid Trump.
That is from the dossier, dope.
Like I said, if you knew what was actually in it, you would know what has been verified.
The Clinton's are corrupt and greedy and think the GOP is the real enemy, greater than ISIS, al Qaeda, or N. KOREA
He's the 1st President to quote the / a Socialist in an Inauguration - or any other - speech.Obama himself was admittedly tutored by Frank Marshall Davis, a prominent communist. He studied socialist Saul Alinsky and even quoted from Slinsky's book, Rules for Radicals, during his first inauguration speech. You may have sealed almost every personal record in existence, but he openly talked about these relationships and how anti-American, hate-spewing, racist Pastor Jeremiah Wright was his mentor.Compromised?
You mean like Democrats taking Millions from the Russians, taking thousands of unreported shares of Russian stock, of working for the KGB bank and the Russian spy agency?
Bwuhahaha...
What I find hilarious is that the most prominent demcrat politicians have ties to communist front groups and take money from globalists like Tom Steyer and George Soros and the leftard clown posse here are absolutely oblivious to that very salient fact.
The fact that their connections to Russians now being exposed should not be a shock to anyone.
Was it not Obama, when he thought his microphone was off, who told Medvedev to pass on to Putin that he would be more 'flexible' after his reelection was over?
As then, Democrats true selves are being revealed, even now my other Democrats.
Saul died when Obama was 9 or 10 years old. a book he wrote was used in classes that hundreds of thousands students read, agreed or disagreed with, almost all big corporations are globalist (the ones many want to give huge tax breaks to) Soros & other billionaires put there money where it is in there best interest, this includes Republicans as well as Democrats.
He's the 1st President to quote the / a Socialist in an Inauguration - or any other - speech.
Where is the evidence that Trump Jr promised the Russians anything? What you believe about the orphans is irrelevant.Remember supposedly it was about orphans. Come on do you believe that? Maybe Ivan's but not don jr.Really? Where's the evidence for that claim?Trump jr promised things to the Russians if they helped them win our election. Quid pro quo.And business ties to Russia are illegal how?
They say it was about adoptions. That's a lie.
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
I'm on smartphone. Look it up. Don trump jr quid pro quo. You post the links you find dummy. Lazy fuckHe did and I don't expect you to remember or acknowledge he did that. So did kushner and ten other trumpstersReally? Where's the evidence for that claim?Trump jr promised things to the Russians if they helped them win our election. Quid pro quo.
They say it was about adoptions. That's a lie.
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
Prove it, asshole. Post a link showing they did.
Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job. You have been in this forum long enough to know what kind of response you will get with a suggestion like that.
Mudwhistle asked for a link. I didn't. However, your link is points to what some scumbag fakenewsjournalist thinks, not the actual statements Carter page made and the statements in the "dossier" they supposedly support.Try quoting the actual statements that support claims made in the "dossier." We don't need a bunch of fakenews assholes telling us what they think about Page's testimony.
You asked for links and I gave them to you. And The Daily Caller isn't "fake news"...it's one of your own fellow alt-right websites.
You keep moving the bar for obvious reasons; you know your argument is shit.
Where is the evidence that Trump Jr promised the Russians anything? What you believe about the orphans is irrelevant.Remember supposedly it was about orphans. Come on do you believe that? Maybe Ivan's but not don jr.Really? Where's the evidence for that claim?Trump jr promised things to the Russians if they helped them win our election. Quid pro quo.And business ties to Russia are illegal how?
They say it was about adoptions. That's a lie.
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
The Russian lawyer he met with said he did. That's all we peons know so far.
Where is the evidence that Trump Jr promised the Russians anything? What you believe about the orphans is irrelevant.Remember supposedly it was about orphans. Come on do you believe that? Maybe Ivan's but not don jr.Really? Where's the evidence for that claim?Trump jr promised things to the Russians if they helped them win our election. Quid pro quo.
They say it was about adoptions. That's a lie.
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
The Russian lawyer he met with said he did. That's all we peons know so far.
What promises did she claim he made?
I thought Russians were the enemy and weren't to be trusted.
Where is the evidence that Trump Jr promised the Russians anything? What you believe about the orphans is irrelevant.Remember supposedly it was about orphans. Come on do you believe that? Maybe Ivan's but not don jr.Really? Where's the evidence for that claim?Trump jr promised things to the Russians if they helped them win our election. Quid pro quo.
They say it was about adoptions. That's a lie.
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
The Russian lawyer he met with said he did. That's all we peons know so far.
What promises did she claim he made?
I thought Russians were the enemy and weren't to be trusted.
I'm on smartphone. Look it up. Don trump jr quid pro quo. You post the links you find dummy. Lazy fuckHe did and I don't expect you to remember or acknowledge he did that. So did kushner and ten other trumpstersReally? Where's the evidence for that claim?
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
Prove it, asshole. Post a link showing they did.
Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job. You have been in this forum long enough to know what kind of response you will get with a suggestion like that.
"Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job."
But it's also not anyone's job to be your mommy and spoonfeed you information found all over the media. If you aren't keeping up, that's your problem.
Where is the evidence that Trump Jr promised the Russians anything? What you believe about the orphans is irrelevant.Remember supposedly it was about orphans. Come on do you believe that? Maybe Ivan's but not don jr.Really? Where's the evidence for that claim?
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
The Russian lawyer he met with said he did. That's all we peons know so far.
What promises did she claim he made?
I thought Russians were the enemy and weren't to be trusted.Where is the evidence that Trump Jr promised the Russians anything? What you believe about the orphans is irrelevant.Remember supposedly it was about orphans. Come on do you believe that? Maybe Ivan's but not don jr.Really? Where's the evidence for that claim?
Do all snowflakes rely on "facts" they just make up?
The Russian lawyer he met with said he did. That's all we peons know so far.
What promises did she claim he made?
I thought Russians were the enemy and weren't to be trusted.
You're doing it again...demanding everyone spoonfeed you....but, okay. She said he promised to see what they could do about the Magnitsky Act.
I'm on smartphone. Look it up. Don trump jr quid pro quo. You post the links you find dummy. Lazy fuckHe did and I don't expect you to remember or acknowledge he did that. So did kushner and ten other trumpsters
Prove it, asshole. Post a link showing they did.
Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job. You have been in this forum long enough to know what kind of response you will get with a suggestion like that.
"Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job."
But it's also not anyone's job to be your mommy and spoonfeed you information found all over the media. If you aren't keeping up, that's your problem.
Yes, that basically is your job if you expect anyone to believe your moronic claims. If you aren't willing to do the work required, then shut the fuck up and quit bothering the adults.
You don't seem to understand how a debate works. Here's a clue for you: I'm not on your side. What does that tell you about the evidence I'm willing to gather to prove your point?
It is your job, moron. Do you think the lawyer for the defense is suppose to provide the prosecution it uses to convict the defendent? You really are a special kind of moron. If you don't want to support your case, then go away and shut the fuck up. You have already lost the argument.I'm on smartphone. Look it up. Don trump jr quid pro quo. You post the links you find dummy. Lazy fuckProve it, asshole. Post a link showing they did.
Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job. You have been in this forum long enough to know what kind of response you will get with a suggestion like that.
"Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job."
But it's also not anyone's job to be your mommy and spoonfeed you information found all over the media. If you aren't keeping up, that's your problem.
Yes, that basically is your job if you expect anyone to believe your moronic claims. If you aren't willing to do the work required, then shut the fuck up and quit bothering the adults.
You don't seem to understand how a debate works. Here's a clue for you: I'm not on your side. What does that tell you about the evidence I'm willing to gather to prove your point?
No, it is not my job, when this is easily available info. It is not my job to be your mommy. And I dont care if you believe me. I don't care whether or not you beleieve water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation whatsoever to prove to you that it is .
None of this would be happening if it weren't for a criminal conspiracy hatched by Obama and Hillary.Look...I look at everything, and I know Obama's history and Hillary's history.
I didn't just wake up this year.
Obama and Hillary have nothing to do with this.
So what is it gonna take for you to admit that Trump's up to his nose in Russia stuff?
?It is your job, moron. Do you think the lawyer for the defense is suppose to provide the prosecution it uses to convict the defendent? You really are a special kind of moron. If you don't want to support your case, then go away and shut the fuck up. You have already lost the argument.I'm on smartphone. Look it up. Don trump jr quid pro quo. You post the links you find dummy. Lazy fuck
Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job. You have been in this forum long enough to know what kind of response you will get with a suggestion like that.
"Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job."
But it's also not anyone's job to be your mommy and spoonfeed you information found all over the media. If you aren't keeping up, that's your problem.
Yes, that basically is your job if you expect anyone to believe your moronic claims. If you aren't willing to do the work required, then shut the fuck up and quit bothering the adults.
You don't seem to understand how a debate works. Here's a clue for you: I'm not on your side. What does that tell you about the evidence I'm willing to gather to prove your point?
No, it is not my job, when this is easily available info. It is not my job to be your mommy. And I dont care if you believe me. I don't care whether or not you beleieve water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation whatsoever to prove to you that it is .
?It is your job, moron. Do you think the lawyer for the defense is suppose to provide the prosecution it uses to convict the defendent? You really are a special kind of moron. If you don't want to support your case, then go away and shut the fuck up. You have already lost the argument.Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job. You have been in this forum long enough to know what kind of response you will get with a suggestion like that.
"Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job."
But it's also not anyone's job to be your mommy and spoonfeed you information found all over the media. If you aren't keeping up, that's your problem.
Yes, that basically is your job if you expect anyone to believe your moronic claims. If you aren't willing to do the work required, then shut the fuck up and quit bothering the adults.
You don't seem to understand how a debate works. Here's a clue for you: I'm not on your side. What does that tell you about the evidence I'm willing to gather to prove your point?
No, it is not my job, when this is easily available info. It is not my job to be your mommy. And I dont care if you believe me. I don't care whether or not you beleieve water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation whatsoever to prove to you that it is .
It's not my job, crybaby. I am not your mommy. I do not care if you believe if water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation to prove to you that it is. These are not obscure facts or complicated ideas requiring support. Get off your lazy ass and do the hard work of educating yourself before you comment on a topic, instead of lying there like a freaking vegetable, demanding the rest of the world spoonfeed you easily found information.
And you are confusing yourself. You asked for one bit of information, not a legal case. I reaponded with it. Quit yer crybabying, get yourself together, man.
?It is your job, moron. Do you think the lawyer for the defense is suppose to provide the prosecution it uses to convict the defendent? You really are a special kind of moron. If you don't want to support your case, then go away and shut the fuck up. You have already lost the argument."Hunting down evidence to support your claims is not my job."
But it's also not anyone's job to be your mommy and spoonfeed you information found all over the media. If you aren't keeping up, that's your problem.
Yes, that basically is your job if you expect anyone to believe your moronic claims. If you aren't willing to do the work required, then shut the fuck up and quit bothering the adults.
You don't seem to understand how a debate works. Here's a clue for you: I'm not on your side. What does that tell you about the evidence I'm willing to gather to prove your point?
No, it is not my job, when this is easily available info. It is not my job to be your mommy. And I dont care if you believe me. I don't care whether or not you beleieve water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation whatsoever to prove to you that it is .
It's not my job, crybaby. I am not your mommy. I do not care if you believe if water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation to prove to you that it is. These are not obscure facts or complicated ideas requiring support. Get off your lazy ass and do the hard work of educating yourself before you comment on a topic, instead of lying there like a freaking vegetable, demanding the rest of the world spoonfeed you easily found information.
And you are confusing yourself. You asked for one bit of information, not a legal case. I reaponded with it. Quit yer crybabying, get yourself together, man.
It is your job, dumbass. In a debate each side preents the evidence that supports their claims. They don't provide evidence that supports the opposition's claims. I'm sorry you are so infantile and lazy that you can't be bothered to support the claims you make. Why do you even post in here if you don't care wether anyone believes you? I certainly don't care whether anyone believes you, so why would a produce your evidence for you?
How many times do you have to be beaten over the head before you get the point?
Since you already provided the requested information (sort of) why do you continue crying about it like a 2-year-old?
?It is your job, moron. Do you think the lawyer for the defense is suppose to provide the prosecution it uses to convict the defendent? You really are a special kind of moron. If you don't want to support your case, then go away and shut the fuck up. You have already lost the argument.Yes, that basically is your job if you expect anyone to believe your moronic claims. If you aren't willing to do the work required, then shut the fuck up and quit bothering the adults.
You don't seem to understand how a debate works. Here's a clue for you: I'm not on your side. What does that tell you about the evidence I'm willing to gather to prove your point?
No, it is not my job, when this is easily available info. It is not my job to be your mommy. And I dont care if you believe me. I don't care whether or not you beleieve water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation whatsoever to prove to you that it is .
It's not my job, crybaby. I am not your mommy. I do not care if you believe if water is wet, nor do I feel any obligation to prove to you that it is. These are not obscure facts or complicated ideas requiring support. Get off your lazy ass and do the hard work of educating yourself before you comment on a topic, instead of lying there like a freaking vegetable, demanding the rest of the world spoonfeed you easily found information.
And you are confusing yourself. You asked for one bit of information, not a legal case. I reaponded with it. Quit yer crybabying, get yourself together, man.
It is your job, dumbass. In a debate each side preents the evidence that supports their claims. They don't provide evidence that supports the opposition's claims. I'm sorry you are so infantile and lazy that you can't be bothered to support the claims you make. Why do you even post in here if you don't care wether anyone believes you? I certainly don't care whether anyone believes you, so why would a produce your evidence for you?
How many times do you have to be beaten over the head before you get the point?
Since you already provided the requested information (sort of) why do you continue crying about it like a 2-year-old?
No crybaby, it is not anyone's job to spoonfeed you easily accessible information that anyone should possess before commenting on this topic. You go ahead and lie there like a whiny little newborn baby, and wait to be spoonfed. That seems to be your sweet spot.
The "dossier" is a pile of crap. Intelligence is something a government agency produces, not some scumbag criminal organization. Nothing in the "dossier" has been validated, and plenty of it has been shown to be pure horseshit.So you think that a work of fiction becomes factual if only one detail of the work is true??The dossier said he was early last year. That was later shown to be true. That's called corroboration.offer us one outtake from your link.
The author of this hit piece claims Carter Page was a Russian agent and the dossier proves it.
Damn. Yah learn something new every day.
So if Harry Potter is from the UK, which actually exists, then Hogwarts exists? Shit, I'm still waiting on my letter. Bastards.
The dossier was raw intelligence. Raw intelligence requires verification. That has happened for a portion of it.
