Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I tried that but the cops kept pulling me over because the sun reflecting off of it was causing other motorists to crash.I've used mine at 90 mph...but after that I'm too afraid. The speed might affect the radiation that comes out of the phone and harm my brain.Maybe you should think about changing your cell phone service. I have no trouble using mine at 60 mph.
If you wear a tinfoil hat you'll have no problem.
What a waste of brain power though...with a few notable exceptions, the troofers are mostly pretty smart people...but damn do they like to delude themselves.these guys focus on minutia and think because they dont get an answer that is satisfactory to THEM, that it is the smoking gun for an inside jobAirphones used cellular towers and are considered a type of cell phone.Ravi, what part of my last post directed to you was confusing? You're a shitbag ****. Period. You displayed that when you claimed cell phones and airphones are the same thing after I proved olson said his wife used a cell phone. Fuck off.
All you have proven is that people can and do get confused about what to call different types of telephones and that journalists can editorialize sloppily.
Olsen stated he didn't know what phone his wife called him from. And in fact, he couldn't know if the calls came through his office switchboard.
What all this proves in your mind is the question of the day. But you are too much of a coward to answer.
"We Know in 2001 Cell Phones Worked Up To 50,000 Feet and..." Well, that was the claim from some guy working for Popular Mechanics. He never supports that claim, but since he said it then it must be true! Unfortunately, the facts do not support his claim. The HC is running its old bullshit "look at 9E" which is really just airwave fodder for people gullible and insecure enough to simply accept what the government says and to not question such stellar publications such as Poopular Mekanics ...
Hi Curve:
"We Know in 2001 Cell Phones Worked Up To 50,000 Feet and..." Well, that was the claim from some guy working for Popular Mechanics. He never supports that claim, but since he said it then it must be true! Unfortunately, the facts do not support his claim. The HC is running its old bullshit "look at 9E" which is really just airwave fodder for people gullible and insecure enough to simply accept what the government says and to not question such stellar publications such as Poopular Mekanics ...
The question about whether cell phones work or do not work at 50,000 feet is totally irrelevant to 'the' 911Truth. AA11 and AA77 were canceled on 9/11 (link) and Flights 93 and 175 both landed in Cleveland (story). Anyone capable of blowing the 9/11 Inside-Job Cover (Global Guardian Wargames from my "What Happened On 9/11" Topic) was murdered by the FBI/CIA (al-CIA-duh) and assigned seats on two canceled flights and two flights that landed in Cleveland on 9/11. Raytheon Missiles were used in all the 9/11 attacks 'and' Raytheon employees were murdered on 9/11 (story from my Blog Entry) 'and' given seats on these flights!
There were 'no' cell phones used on 9/11 by any of these inside-job victims! They were all already DEAD before the FBI assigned them seats on the manufactured flight manifests! Every time you bring up the 'cell phone' nonsense, then you are adding credibility to the Official Govt Cover Story LIE ...
GL,
Terral
I tried to tell him that the 911 Troofer Association wanted him to stfu. 
I'm convinced it is caused by some chemical imbalance or deficiency in their brainsWhat a waste of brain power though...with a few notable exceptions, the troofers are mostly pretty smart people...but damn do they like to delude themselves.these guys focus on minutia and think because they dont get an answer that is satisfactory to THEM, that it is the smoking gun for an inside jobAirphones used cellular towers and are considered a type of cell phone.
All you have proven is that people can and do get confused about what to call different types of telephones and that journalists can editorialize sloppily.
Olsen stated he didn't know what phone his wife called him from. And in fact, he couldn't know if the calls came through his office switchboard.
What all this proves in your mind is the question of the day. But you are too much of a coward to answer.
It isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
Hi Curve:
"We Know in 2001 Cell Phones Worked Up To 50,000 Feet and..." Well, that was the claim from some guy working for Popular Mechanics. He never supports that claim, but since he said it then it must be true! Unfortunately, the facts do not support his claim. The HC is running its old bullshit "look at 9E" which is really just airwave fodder for people gullible and insecure enough to simply accept what the government says and to not question such stellar publications such as Poopular Mekanics ...
The question about whether cell phones work or do not work at 50,000 feet is totally irrelevant to 'the' 911Truth. AA11 and AA77 were canceled on 9/11 (link) and Flights 93 and 175 both landed in Cleveland (story). Anyone capable of blowing the 9/11 Inside-Job Cover (Global Guardian Wargames from my "What Happened On 9/11" Topic) was murdered by the FBI/CIA (al-CIA-duh) and assigned seats on two canceled flights and two flights that landed in Cleveland on 9/11. Raytheon Missiles were used in all the 9/11 attacks 'and' Raytheon employees were murdered on 9/11 (story from my Blog Entry) 'and' given seats on these flights!
There were 'no' cell phones used on 9/11 by any of these inside-job victims! They were all already DEAD before the FBI assigned them seats on the manufactured flight manifests! Every time you bring up the 'cell phone' nonsense, then you are adding credibility to the Official Govt Cover Story LIE ...
GL,
Terral
I tried that but the cops kept pulling me over because the sun reflecting off of it was causing other motorists to crash.I've used mine at 90 mph...but after that I'm too afraid. The speed might affect the radiation that comes out of the phone and harm my brain.
If you wear a tinfoil hat you'll have no problem.
It isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
you can lose a cell phone signal walking too. does this mean you are walking too fast?
this is the most moronic fucking claim you have ever made!!!!![/QUOTE]
I think you're beginning to win on points as well as knockdowns.
no kiddingIt isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
you can lose a cell phone signal walking too. does this mean you are walking too fast?
this is the most moronic fucking claim you have ever made!!!!!
no kiddingIt isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
you can lose a cell phone signal walking too. does this mean you are walking too fast?
this is the most moronic fucking claim you have ever made!!!!!
i never knew you could out run a radio signal
LOL
whoda thunk it
thats liability he calls thatno kiddingyou can lose a cell phone signal walking too. does this mean you are walking too fast?
this is the most moronic fucking claim you have ever made!!!!!
i never knew you could out run a radio signal
LOL
whoda thunk it
Can you prove there are radio signals? Theres nothing in the Commission Report about whether the telecommunication satellites had recently been serviced by the Space Shuttle, the expertise of the "pilots" who are all of the sudden doing space walks to fix satellites, what type of sattellites they were, etc...
Fuck...can you even prove there are satellites? Have you ever seen one?
Didn't thinkso snitchwitch, switchnitche, stitchclip or whatever the hell he calls you.
Now keep in mind, I'm not saying there are not satellites, just that the CR didn't mention that there were Satellites on 9T, 9E, or 9Tw.
It isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
Maybe you should think about changing your cell phone service. I have no trouble using mine at 60 mph.
except for in your deluded world, you seem to think the reason it "can be lost" is due to the speed, and not the fact they drove out of the cell towers RANGEIt isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
Maybe you should think about changing your cell phone service. I have no trouble using mine at 60 mph.
Learn how to read. I didn't say I lose the signal at that speed. I only said "you can," as in general users, can lose their call from that speed. You ignored the point of the example. Why is that?
What a waste of brain power though...with a few notable exceptions, the troofers are mostly pretty smart people...but damn do they like to delude themselves.these guys focus on minutia and think because they dont get an answer that is satisfactory to THEM, that it is the smoking gun for an inside jobAirphones used cellular towers and are considered a type of cell phone.
All you have proven is that people can and do get confused about what to call different types of telephones and that journalists can editorialize sloppily.
Olsen stated he didn't know what phone his wife called him from. And in fact, he couldn't know if the calls came through his office switchboard.
What all this proves in your mind is the question of the day. But you are too much of a coward to answer.
.Hi Curve:
"We Know in 2001 Cell Phones Worked Up To 50,000 Feet and..." Well, that was the claim from some guy working for Popular Mechanics. He never supports that claim, but since he said it then it must be true! Unfortunately, the facts do not support his claim. The HC is running its old bullshit "look at 9E" which is really just airwave fodder for people gullible and insecure enough to simply accept what the government says and to not question such stellar publications such as Poopular Mekanics ...
The question about whether cell phones work or do not work at 50,000 feet is totally irrelevant to 'the' 911Truth. AA11 and AA77 were canceled on 9/11 (link) and Flights 93 and 175 both landed in Cleveland (story). Anyone capable of blowing the 9/11 Inside-Job Cover (Global Guardian Wargames from my "What Happened On 9/11" Topic) was murdered by the FBI/CIA (al-CIA-duh) and assigned seats on two canceled flights and two flights that landed in Cleveland on 9/11. Raytheon Missiles were used in all the 9/11 attacks 'and' Raytheon employees were murdered on 9/11 (story from my Blog Entry) 'and' given seats on these flights!
There were 'no' cell phones used on 9/11 by any of these inside-job victims! They were all already DEAD before the FBI assigned them seats on the manufactured flight manifests! Every time you bring up the 'cell phone' nonsense, then you are adding credibility to the Official Govt Cover Story LIE ...
GL,
Terral
so, you agree with terral?.Hi Curve:
"We Know in 2001 Cell Phones Worked Up To 50,000 Feet and..." Well, that was the claim from some guy working for Popular Mechanics. He never supports that claim, but since he said it then it must be true! Unfortunately, the facts do not support his claim. The HC is running its old bullshit "look at 9E" which is really just airwave fodder for people gullible and insecure enough to simply accept what the government says and to not question such stellar publications such as Poopular Mekanics ...
The question about whether cell phones work or do not work at 50,000 feet is totally irrelevant to 'the' 911Truth. AA11 and AA77 were canceled on 9/11 (link) and Flights 93 and 175 both landed in Cleveland (story). Anyone capable of blowing the 9/11 Inside-Job Cover (Global Guardian Wargames from my "What Happened On 9/11" Topic) was murdered by the FBI/CIA (al-CIA-duh) and assigned seats on two canceled flights and two flights that landed in Cleveland on 9/11. Raytheon Missiles were used in all the 9/11 attacks 'and' Raytheon employees were murdered on 9/11 (story from my Blog Entry) 'and' given seats on these flights!
There were 'no' cell phones used on 9/11 by any of these inside-job victims! They were all already DEAD before the FBI assigned them seats on the manufactured flight manifests! Every time you bring up the 'cell phone' nonsense, then you are adding credibility to the Official Govt Cover Story LIE ...
GL,
Terral
I brought up the 50,000 foot quote to prove the bias from Poopular Mechanics.
It isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
you can lose a cell phone signal walking too. does this mean you are walking too fast?
this is the most moronic fucking claim you have ever made!!!!!
my GAWD you are stupidIt isn't only the altitude but speed as well. You can lose a cell signal driving at 60 mph so how feasible is it to hold a signal at 400 mph?
you can lose a cell phone signal walking too. does this mean you are walking too fast?
this is the most moronic fucking claim you have ever made!!!!!
Thank you for helping prove cell drops can happen when walking on the ground. If there are connection problems while walking what do you think happens in a plane at 20,000 feet moving 400+ miles per hour?
You also just proved your stoopidity and dishonesty. Again. I never said speed was the only factor. Interference from structures, altitude, and speed all contribute to dropped calls. I'm pretty sure you will continue to lie and say I claimed speed was the only factor. You're so fucking dumb.
