Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
I've seen solid proof.Except that no one ever shows any solid proof. What y'all waiting for to present some?You made me think about the concept of evidence and realized that 99% of cases where a verdict is agreed is due to rather weak links between the evidence that infers that something occurred and the evidence, usually lacking, that a particular person or group committed the act that resulted in a trial.Just cuz Trump stacked SCOTUS in his favour, doesn't mean that they'll support any nonsense whatsoever. So far, there's been NO solid evidence. And even you know that.See Post #42.Plenty of evidence for the housing bubble. For election fraud, nothing concrete so far.Just like GW's Housing Bubble...Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.The "victories" are impossible.Except no one has real proof of that.The "victories" are statistically impossible.Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.Being pro-US is obnoxious?I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything.![]()
Successful is the word you look for.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
No evidence but it happened.
SCOTUS will decide.
The old adage of Beyond The Shadow Of a Doubt does not apply in the real world...
The Columbo, or CSI, effect has influenced people to believe that there must be solid evidence to convince a jury or jurist.
This is, in reality not the legal threshold.
The threshold is Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
93+% of law suits are settled out of court because no one wants to spend the money, even when the claimant will eventually win because the expense is not worth the time and money.
If you watch real life criminal shows that drag you through the actual cases that result in life imprisonment or the death penalty, 99+% of them do not have solid evidence to back up the penalty...
The Jury and Jurist decide upon the outcome via the legal mechanism of Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
The events and results of Election night go way beyond the threshold of Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
You haven't because, like myself, you've been trained by movies and TV shows to think you have to see someone actually walking up to the ballot machine and manipulating the ballot.
I used to think like you until I took several law classes and learned that's not the way the legal system works.