We must also draw down existing CO2 levels

[Old Rocks]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

 

[Darkwind]

Just stop exhaling.

 

[themirrorthief]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

carbon dioxide is necessary for life on the planet

 

[Old Rocks]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

carbon dioxide is necessary for life on the planet

You cannot live without salt. So just eat a quart of it, cannot possibly hurt you since it is necessary for life.

 

[excalibur]

The OP sure has fallen hard for the lie of AGW. Or is he paid to post this stuff?

 

[Hellokitty]

Interesting he shows no example of regenerative agriculture and crops.

 

[EMH]

Co2 is not a variable that explains earth climate change.

Your cause is fraud.

90% of earth ice is on Antarctica... Yet the north and south poles both have the same amount of co2

 

[frigidweirdo]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

carbon dioxide is necessary for life on the planet

Oxygen is also necessary. Too much of it will kill us. Same with the Sun and water.

What's your point?

 

[frigidweirdo]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

You can't "cease emissions".

What would CO2 levels on the planet be if humans hadn't have industrialized?

 

[Wyatt earp]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

You can't "cease emissions".

What would CO2 levels on the planet be if humans hadn't have industrialized?

Trillion dollar question, that's why we always have these arguments

 

[fncceo]

We must also draw down existing CO2 levels​

I invite you to stop exhaling.

 

[ding]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

Installing solar panels to cool the planet should do the trick. The ocean will do the rest.

 

[Old Rocks]

The OP sure has fallen hard for the lie of AGW. Or is he paid to post this stuff?

Sad that there are so many intellectually stunted people incapable of understanding basic science. You have my sympathy.

 

[Old Rocks]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

You can't "cease emissions".

What would CO2 levels on the planet be if humans hadn't have industrialized?

About 280 ppm, not the present 410+ ppm. And CH4 would be about 600 t0 700 ppb, not the present 1850+ ppb. That you even ask that question in an indication of your ignorance.

 

[Old Rocks]

Co2 is not a variable that explains earth climate change.

Your cause is fraud.

90% of earth ice is on Antarctica... Yet the north and south poles both have the same amount of co2

Damn. OK, another prime example of Dunning-Kruger. The Arctic Ocean is a sea surrounded by land, The Antarctic is a continent surrounded by oceans. If that means nothing to you, I suggest you try repeating the third grade.

 

[Old Rocks]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

You can't "cease emissions".

What would CO2 levels on the planet be if humans hadn't have industrialized?

Trillion dollar question, that's why we always have these arguments

The answer is in the ice cores.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

You can't "cease emissions".

What would CO2 levels on the planet be if humans hadn't have industrialized?

About 280 ppm, not the present 410+ ppm. And CH4 would be about 600 t0 700 ppb, not the present 1850+ ppb. That you even ask that question in an indication of your ignorance.

Are you sure?

Historic Co2 levels

Besuche den Beitrag für mehr Info.

sciencefiles.org

Historically it's been much, much higher. And the levels have never remained stable even in the last 100,000 years.

 

[Old Rocks]

The challenge is not just to cease emissions, but also to draw down existing levels. It can be done, and here is one of the ways;

You can't "cease emissions".

What would CO2 levels on the planet be if humans hadn't have industrialized?

About 280 ppm, not the present 410+ ppm. And CH4 would be about 600 t0 700 ppb, not the present 1850+ ppb. That you even ask that question in an indication of your ignorance.

Are you sure?

Historic Co2 levels

Besuche den Beitrag für mehr Info.

sciencefiles.org

Historically it's been much, much higher. And the levels have never remained stable even in the last 100,000 years.

"Based on geological evidence collected over the six decades scientists have been tracking atmospheric CO₂, this year's peak appears to be the highest in as long as 4.5 million years. This continued accumulation of greenhouse gas is driving dangerous global heating around the world.

In 1958, when modern measurements began, atmospheric CO₂ was at 316 ppm. Three centuries ago, before the beginning of the industrial age, geological records show that number was 280 ppm. In other words, by burning fossil fuels in generators and cars, humanity has increased concentrations of the most important greenhouse gas by 50%." CO2 reaches its highest level in more than 4 million years

Homo Sapiens has only been around for about 200 to 300 thousand years. In that time, it has never been above 300 ppm. And the CH4 had never been above 700 ppb, and is now 1850+ ppb. For every degree, celsius, of increase in heat in the atmosphere, the atmosphere can hold 7% more water vapor, a very potent GHG. Climate Signals | Atmospheric Moisture Increase.

 

[Oddball]

"We".....lmao

Do your part, OldRocksintheHead, and log off the interwebz forever, then live in a cave and only get around on a beast of burden.

Put up or shut up.

 

[Old Rocks]

"We".....lmao

Do your part, OldRocksintheHead, and log off the interwebz forever, then live in a cave and only get around on a beast of burden.

Put up or shut up.

That is always the flap-yap of you nitwits when you have no answer. I am the one appreciating the advancing technology, you are the silly ass wanting to go back to the 19th century.