Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....
Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.
Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide
The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....
Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.
Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide
In a war it seems things change somewhat. Security becomes more important and measures that are taken to protect the American people during a war are different than during peace time. And the Court seems to agree with that concept.The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....
Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.
Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide
Lawless? It's not like the President of the United States can do things like go around imprisoning innocent civilians because they are of a different race without the checks and balances stopping him or her......oh wait.
You know who else agrees with that "concept"? Idiots. I didn't ask the government for any additional "measures" to "protect" me during war. Did you? Where is it written in the U.S. Constitution that the government may employ any "measures" they desire during war?In a war it seems things change somewhat. Security becomes more important and measures that are taken to protect the American people during a war are different than during peace time. And the Court seems to agree with that concept.The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....
Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.
Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide
Lawless? It's not like the President of the United States can do things like go around imprisoning innocent civilians because they are of a different race without the checks and balances stopping him or her......oh wait.
It was that damn Revolution against Britain that caused the beginning of our national debt and the debt lasted until aThis has happened for one reason and one reason only: the cancer known as progressivism created an unconstitutional monstrosity out of the federal government. Tax revenues are the highest they've ever been. We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. Had the federal government been restrained to the 18 enumerated powers legally required by the U.S. Constitution, we would have a national debt of $0.00 today.
By 2023, spending on net interest payments will surpass spending on national defense.
Taxpayers Are Paying Billions to Service the National Debt
As you said...that was paid off in full. We had $0.00 in national debt under under Andrew Jackson. Then FDR stepped in one day and everything went to shit. Republican's were stuck with the nightmare he created. Idiots like LBJ and Jimmy Carter only built on it.It was that damn Revolution against Britain that caused the beginning of our national debt and the debt lasted until aThis has happened for one reason and one reason only: the cancer known as progressivism created an unconstitutional monstrosity out of the federal government. Tax revenues are the highest they've ever been. We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. Had the federal government been restrained to the 18 enumerated powers legally required by the U.S. Constitution, we would have a national debt of $0.00 today.
By 2023, spending on net interest payments will surpass spending on national defense.
Taxpayers Are Paying Billions to Service the National Debt
Democratic president paid it off, then lo and behold, it came back.
The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....
Beyond the controversial ways stingray technology works, the secrecy and deception law enforcement agencies use to cloak their use of the devices is also troubling. Law enforcement agencies around the country have routinely used the devices without obtaining a warrant from judges. In cases where they did obtain a warrant, they often deceived judges about the nature of the technology they planned to use. Instead of telling judges that they intended to use a stingray or cell site simulator, they have often mischaracterized the technology, describing it as a pen register device instead.
Hacker Lexicon: Stingrays, the Spy Tool the Government Tried, and Failed, to Hide
As you said...that was paid off in full. We had $0.00 in national debt under under Andrew Jackson. Then FDR stepped in one day and everything went to shit. Republican's were stuck with the nightmare he created. Idiots like LBJ and Jimmy Carter only built on it.
As you said...that was paid off in full. We had $0.00 in national debt under under Andrew Jackson. Then FDR stepped in one day and everything went to shit. Republican's were stuck with the nightmare he created. Idiots like LBJ and Jimmy Carter only built on it.
Oh, Poodle... you are too funny. Point was between Geo. Washington and Jimmy Carter, we had less than a Trillion dollars of debt, despite two world wars, massive infrastructure building, and the creation of a social safety net.
Then Ronnie Ray-gun decided it was just soooooo unfair that the rich had to pay their fair share. and he put out some snake oil about how cutting taxes would create revenues.
so instead, we got 3 Trillion dollars of additional debt by the Time George Bush got run out of office.
Clinton finally got it under control and we were posting surpluses. Then we let Bush clincally retarded son steal the presidency, who doubled the debt again.
Clinton did not post surpluses. The only way surpuses were claimed is by shuffling money around to make it look good. He "borrowed" from the Sicial Security coffers like it was free money. There may have been less debt in one specific area, but there was never a surplus.
Clinton did not post surpluses. The only way surpuses were claimed is by shuffling money around to make it look good. He "borrowed" from the Sicial Security coffers like it was free money. There may have been less debt in one specific area, but there was never a surplus.
If you take in more money then you are paying out, that's a surplus... Sorry.
Point was, Clinton had spending and taxing at the right levels. Then Bush put a war ona credit card while giving his rich buddies obscene tax breaks, and here we are.
America had 22 presidents between Jackson and FDR, and of the 22, 17 were Republicans or Whigs and the nation they handed FDR was vastly different than the one Jackson gave to Harrison.As you said...that was paid off in full. We had $0.00 in national debt under under Andrew Jackson. Then FDR stepped in one day and everything went to shit. Republican's were stuck with the nightmare he created. Idiots like LBJ and Jimmy Carter only built on it.It was that damn Revolution against Britain that caused the beginning of our national debt and the debt lasted until aThis has happened for one reason and one reason only: the cancer known as progressivism created an unconstitutional monstrosity out of the federal government. Tax revenues are the highest they've ever been. We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. Had the federal government been restrained to the 18 enumerated powers legally required by the U.S. Constitution, we would have a national debt of $0.00 today.
By 2023, spending on net interest payments will surpass spending on national defense.
Taxpayers Are Paying Billions to Service the National Debt
Democratic president paid it off, then lo and behold, it came back.
At no time during Clinton's term was he taking in more than he spent. He was BORROWING from Social Security rather than from the public. So it looked good. He just changed who the gov't owed.
At no time during Clinton's term was he taking in more than he spent. He was BORROWING from Social Security rather than from the public. So it looked good. He just changed who the gov't owed.
Distinction without a difference. Point was, the government took in more than it spent. This is a good thing.
No, it didn't. Because the Social Security money has not been paid back. So unless you repay that, there was still a deficit. Perhaps you think robbing the SSI coffers is just more revenue for the gov't, but it is not.
