Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone.Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
You’re a victim of breathing too much of your own CO2contamination of what?I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
And prove a mask can keep out a contaminant of any type. you''re fking clueless like all the other human haters.
Strange. Really strange. Extremely strange. For how much money did you sell your grandfather to the devil? 30 silverlings?
prove itYou’re a victim of breathing too much of your own CO2contamination of what?I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
And prove a mask can keep out a contaminant of any type. you''re fking clueless like all the other human haters.
Strange. Really strange. Extremely strange. For how much money did you sell your grandfather to the devil? 30 silverlings?
You use structurally the same form of propaganda as the Commies and Nazis were using.
there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
Everyone is easily able to see this, who reads what you write.prove itYou’re a victim of breathing too much of your own CO2contamination of what?I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
And prove a mask can keep out a contaminant of any type. you''re fking clueless like all the other human haters.
Strange. Really strange. Extremely strange. For how much money did you sell your grandfather to the devil? 30 silverlings?
You use structurally the same form of propaganda as the Commies and Nazis were using.
BREAKING: At a press conference Monday, Tampa Mayor Jane Castor said that maskless fans at the Super Bowl will be "identified" by law enforcement and that police will "handle" the situation.
If you didn’t see this coming you’re an idiot.
www.politico.eu
I thought you all were about the science? you aren't? when you wear a mask your spit and airborne particles go out from around the edges of the mask. They are not respirators, so no, they don't stop what you posted. sorry!!! you're still wrong.there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
you did and so does most everyone else in here. What's your point? you still have no standing evidence to support your nonsense. I provided the study that proves my point. feel free to ratchet up one that supports yours.Everyone is easily able to see this, who reads what you write.prove itYou’re a victim of breathing too much of your own CO2contamination of what?I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
And prove a mask can keep out a contaminant of any type. you''re fking clueless like all the other human haters.
Strange. Really strange. Extremely strange. For how much money did you sell your grandfather to the devil? 30 silverlings?
You use structurally the same form of propaganda as the Commies and Nazis were using.
there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
Like Fauci saying masks do nothing or scientists saying snowfalls are a thing of the past in 2000 type of experts?And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
Surgical mask - WikipediaI'm used to store temporarily. I wrote:why was it in a post then?Read again what I wrote. I had not finished my answer when you started your answer.Moron, that’s what training has hammered into the medical world for a century now.I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors.
"They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important. "
A surgical mask is intended to be worn by health professionals during surgery and certain health care procedures[47] to catch microorganisms shed in liquid droplets and aerosols from the wearer's mouth and nose.[31] Evidence supports the effectiveness of surgical masks in reducing the risk of infection among other healthcare workers and in the community.[48] However, a Cochrane review found that there is no clear evidence that disposable face masks worn by members of the surgical team would reduce the risk of wound infections after clean surgical procedures.[49]
So why did it spread with everyone wearing masks?Surgical mask - WikipediaI'm used to store temporarily. I wrote:why was it in a post then?Read again what I wrote. I had not finished my answer when you started your answer.Moron, that’s what training has hammered into the medical world for a century now.I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors.
"They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important. "
A surgical mask is intended to be worn by health professionals during surgery and certain health care procedures[47] to catch microorganisms shed in liquid droplets and aerosols from the wearer's mouth and nose.[31] Evidence supports the effectiveness of surgical masks in reducing the risk of infection among other healthcare workers and in the community.[48] However, a Cochrane review found that there is no clear evidence that disposable face masks worn by members of the surgical team would reduce the risk of wound infections after clean surgical procedures.[49]
In the same articel is written
During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks, such as surgical masks and cloth masks, have been employed as a public and personal health control measure against the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their use is primarily intended as a source control: to limit the transmission of the virus from the wearer to others (in community and healthcare settings), but they can also provide some degree of personal protection to the wearer against the infection.
I thought you all were about the science? you aren't? when you wear a mask your spit and airborne particles go out from around the edges of the mask. They are not respirators, so no, they don't stop what you posted. sorry!!! you're still wrong.there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
I bet you’re one of those morons I see driving alone in your car with your mask on.I thought you all were about the science? you aren't? when you wear a mask your spit and airborne particles go out from around the edges of the mask. They are not respirators, so no, they don't stop what you posted. sorry!!! you're still wrong.there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
Your problem is to think the whole world is wrong while some US-American extremists are right.
Don't you have the god-given sense to not cough, sneeze, or spit in peoples' faces? Are you a moron? This whole face-diaper thing is predicated on the assumption that moronic behavior is the norm and not the exception.there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
do you spit while you breathe? I don't either.Don't you have the god-given sense to not cough, sneeze, or spit in peoples' faces? Are you a moron? This whole face-diaper thing is predicated on the assumption that moronic behavior is the norm and not the exception.there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
well dude, post the evidence? why do you continue to hesitate at that? prove me fking wrong!! are you too chicken?I thought you all were about the science? you aren't? when you wear a mask your spit and airborne particles go out from around the edges of the mask. They are not respirators, so no, they don't stop what you posted. sorry!!! you're still wrong.there's no evidence supporting it protects anyone. ...Yeah, about that:I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important.
The results of the relatively simple trial reported here could easily be repeated and it would be interesting to see whether comparable results are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or other general surgical theatres. The finding that there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection rate when masks were not worn certainly warrants further investigation. This trial was designed only to see whether wound infection increased, as had been predicted, when masks were not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that the wearing of a mask has very little relevance to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine general surgery and it is a standard practice that could be abandoned.
? What do you say here. That a doctor should operate you against lege artis without using a mask?
It's winter: Go outside in the cold and breathe with and without mask. You can see the difference. Try to spit someone into the face with and without mask. You can see the difference. Touch your face with the fingers. You can see the difference. Make your fingers wet with saliva. You can see the differnce ... and so on, and so on.
And all experts worldwide give the same advice: use masks.
Your problem is to think the whole world is wrong while some US-American extremists are right.
So why didn’t counts drop?well fine, so what? post the actual information from a medical journal and it would be a different conclusion.I'm used to store temporarily. I wrote:why was it in a post then?Read again what I wrote. I had not finished my answer when you started your answer.Moron, that’s what training has hammered into the medical world for a century now.I’m good friends with a doctor and 7 nurses. Their entire careers concerning masks has been training to wear it to protect yourself from things flying up at you (blood, tissue) from flying into your mouth. Nothing to do with a virus. They all say this mask thing is BS.What virus exists in operating rooms? This should be good!What an incredibly stupid thing to say.There’s no virus in an operating room
They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors.
"They all should be fired. Operating masks - not only used in case of operations - protect first of all their patients. But it exist much more systems of protection for patients, nurses and doctors. In general the problem is not only to avoid the probability of an infection. The intensity of the first contamination is also important. "
All about masks in the context of COVID-19
Masks should be used as part of a comprehensive strategy of measures to suppress transmission and save lives; the use of a mask alone is not sufficient to provide an adequate level of protection against COVID-19.
If COVID-19 is spreading in your community, stay safe by taking some simple precautions, such as physical distancing, wearing a mask, keeping rooms well ventilated, avoiding crowds, cleaning your hands, and coughing into a bent elbow or tissue. Check local advice where you live and work. Do it all!
Make wearing a mask a normal part of being around other people. The appropriate use, storage and cleaning or disposal of masks are essential to make them as effective as possible.
source: When and how to use masks
...
I bet you’re one of those morons I see driving alone in your car with your mask on.
...
Don't you have the god-given sense to not cough, sneeze, or spit in peoples' faces? Are you a moron? This whole face-diaper thing is predicated on the assumption that moronic behavior is the norm and not the exception.
...
well dude, post the evidence? why do you continue to hesitate at that? prove me fking wrong!! are you too chicken?
...
So why didn’t counts drop?
That’s the Achilles heal of your argument
...
I bet you’re one of those morons I see driving alone in your car with your mask on.
...
Don't you have the god-given sense to not cough, sneeze, or spit in peoples' faces? Are you a moron? This whole face-diaper thing is predicated on the assumption that moronic behavior is the norm and not the exception.
...
well dude, post the evidence? why do you continue to hesitate at that? prove me fking wrong!! are you too chicken?
...
So why didn’t counts drop?
That’s the Achilles heal of your argument
Sorry that I tried to speak with you. My mistake. Bye bye.
I apologize. I never considered that you might have a medical condition that causes unexpected and involuntary expulsions from your nose and mouth. If you do, perhaps it would be a good idea for you to stay away from the public....
I bet you’re one of those morons I see driving alone in your car with your mask on.
...
Don't you have the god-given sense to not cough, sneeze, or spit in peoples' faces? Are you a moron? This whole face-diaper thing is predicated on the assumption that moronic behavior is the norm and not the exception.
...
well dude, post the evidence? why do you continue to hesitate at that? prove me fking wrong!! are you too chicken?
...
So why didn’t counts drop?
That’s the Achilles heal of your argument
Sorry that I tried to speak with you. My mistake. Bye bye.
