Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Without checking the exact number but one is on land and the other is in the sea... The one on land is colder... There is whole documentaries on this and it has nothing to do with climate change mainly...
... because Ted's BIRDBRAIN can only PARROT, never THINK....
90% of Earth ice on LAND MASS Antarctica.
7% of Earth ice on LAND MASS Greenland
97% of Earth ice on the two land masses closest to an Earth pole.... and land MOVES....
Ted, if Earth had two polar oceans, how much ice would it have???
I, and a lot of others gave up on them when they became political arms of the democrat party.I remember when the Weather Channel did weather reports.
Cowboy Ted keeps declaring that no one has posted any 'evidence' yet, which he could have found himself if he WANTED to, but HERE IT IS:
----------------------------------
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
Forbes:
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming
NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging ‘Climate Change’ Data…
300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging 'Climate Change' Data...
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered
Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered
NOAA’s climate change science fiction
The environmental intelligence agency ignores satellite data
LAMAR SMITH: NOAA’s climate change science fiction
Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming
Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming
Scientists published climate change research under fake names. Then they were caught.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=18&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwil9bfblOLQAhUo5YMKHfBVCgs4ChAWCGEwBw&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/09/19/scientists-published-climate-research-under-fake-names-then-they-were-caught/&usg=AFQjCNEgguhI4M_4QDYGw3bO8i0rr3huZg
Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead
Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead Of Paris | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Fake Data—How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived
Fake Data—How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived.
Global Warming "Science": New Study Reveals Large Temperature Fabrication By Cherry-Pick
C3
...and there is SO MUCH MORE....
---------------
My prediction is that libs / Cowboy Ted's 1st reaction is to make a snide comment about the sources not being credible (because they say so...)
I stated at the start that we go around circles with a deluge of fake science...
I am asking for your best piece of evidence, I would hope it has been peer reviewed and fact checked for your own sake...
I just not getting drawn into a abusive discussion of conspiracy theories and fake science...
Please on your side pick your best article to prove your case... I am not going to do what I did we ye before and disprove the first three and act like an idiot...
Here is my proof...
IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
This is peer reviewed and has openly discussed any imperfections in its report... Can you offer real evidence to disprove the leading scientists in the world?
Now can you give a scientific basis for objecting to this... This is the best thinking from a very large group of experts in the field....
Please don't give and article from someone with no climate knowledge, argue science with science...
Even the leading Climate skeptics are saying the Earth is warming at an alarming rate, they had too, the evidence is overwhelming...
Except that it is NOT meltingYou know there is 2,500 meters of ice under the south pole, under the north pole it is about 4 meters thick....
Ice accumulates on land over millions of years, that is why melting it is so dangerous...
what actual point are you trying to make....
By engaging in political issues, NOT THEIR MEDIUM, the Weather Channel has just undermined their own integrity and trust people had in them. If I want to get political propaganda I will turn to CNN or even Fox News.
Thank you for that childish, sore-loser, butt-hurt snowflake response!You do want political propaganda. You voted for Trump. Trump is all propaganda, no substance, all of the time.
What I can understand at this stage...
What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....
We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories...
On this forum we have answered every single question brought up and they go into a loop of making bogus claims we refute and they come with another bogus claim and keep going until they get back to the first one....
There has to be something about credibility... Has the denier group got a claim which we can't refute based on actual science. We have shown our data time and time again...
Asking for detailed proof and choosing to be stupid when you get a detailed answer is not a defense....
So give us again... One shot your best defense for your case... We shoot it down can we just win...
Stop the deluge of bogus crap, just your one best shot...
What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....
We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories..
Everybody except gullible fools understands that "climate change"(aka "global warming" "aka global cooling") is a conspiracy theory designed purely to defraud people out of money and power. It is up to people who hold a theory to prove it's truth and that simply hasn't happened. It hasn't even come close to happening. Nor is it ever going to happen. If you wish to believe that the sky is falling or that you can lay hands on your TV and be healed if you will just send in $19.95 as a "love offering" and vote away your freedom of choice more power to you; just don't expect anything but laughter from me.
Is there a point to this thread?
“Here’s the thing: Science doesn’t care about your opinion.”
A week after Breitbart News published a wildly inaccurate article chalking climate change up as a hoax, The Weather Channel decided to teach the hyper-conservative news outlet a thing or two about scientific fact.
In a post to its website, TWC called the Breitbart piece, which relied heavily on a story published in the Daily Mail, “a prime example of cherry picking, or pulling a single item out of context to build a misleading case.”
TWC’s scathing response features a video post in which atmospheric scientist Kait Parker breaks down each of Breitbart’s claims, including that “global land temperatures have plummeted.”
“Here’s the thing: Science doesn’t care about your opinion,” Parker says in the video. “Cherry picking and changing the facts will not change the future, not the fact ― note: fact, not opinion ― that the earth is warming.”
Here’s Parker’s full takedown:
“What’s worse” than the Breitbart story itself, Parker said, is the fact that the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology posted the story to Twitter.
That’s ridiculous but shouldn’t be surprising. The committee is chaired by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who has a long history of denying climate change, attacking those who accept the scientific consensus and defending the fossil fuel industry. (Also unsurprisingly, the congressman has received more than $693,000 from the oil and gas industry over the course of his career.)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was among those who mocked the House science committee for circulating the story.
More: Weather Channel Destroys Breitbart Over BS Climate Change Story
Thank you, Kait, for debunking this nonsense. We are living in a sad time of dishonesty and fake news.
[
Pointing out your ignorance would be foolish, somethings are self evident. Please look up the
Scientific Method, study it, and then come back and explain how that process proves any part of your post.
Your conclusion is nothing more than an echo of propaganda by those who seek to keep the status quo, and thus protect their golden goose.
What I can understand at this stage...
What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....
We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories...
On this forum we have answered every single question brought up and they go into a loop of making bogus claims we refute and they come with another bogus claim and keep going until they get back to the first one....
There has to be something about credibility... Has the denier group got a claim which we can't refute based on actual science. We have shown our data time and time again...
Asking for detailed proof and choosing to be stupid when you get a detailed answer is not a defense....
So give us again... One shot your best defense for your case... We shoot it down can we just win...
Stop the deluge of bogus crap, just your one best shot...
What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....
We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories..
Everybody except gullible fools understands that "climate change"(aka "global warming" "aka global cooling") is a conspiracy theory designed purely to defraud people out of money and power. It is up to people who hold a theory to prove it's truth and that simply hasn't happened. It hasn't even come close to happening. Nor is it ever going to happen. If you wish to believe that the sky is falling or that you can lay hands on your TV and be healed if you will just send in $19.95 as a "love offering" and vote away your freedom of choice more power to you; just don't expect anything but laughter from me.
Pointing out your ignorance would be foolish, somethings are self evident. Please look up the
Scientific Method, study it, and then come back and explain how that process proves any part of your post.
Your conclusion is nothing more than an echo of propaganda by those who seek to keep the status quo, and thus protect their golden goose.
[
Pointing out your ignorance would be foolish, somethings are self evident. Please look up the
Scientific Method, study it, and then come back and explain how that process proves any part of your post.
So sploogy, you think that science is spelled "D O G M A" do you? You think that the scientific method is "the acceptance of consensus free from questioning of critical examination?"
^^^ seriously? You're either a liar, a fool or brain dead.
Wow, you cultists sure are smart.
Your conclusion is nothing more than an echo of propaganda by those who seek to keep the status quo, and thus protect their golden goose.
Echo of propaganda? You mean the echo of "settled science" and "consensus" doofus?
See my comment above.
Tell me sploogy, what is nullification, and how does it relate to legitimate scientific inquiry? How does nullification demonstrate that the AGW cult is anything but scientific?
Hmmmmm?
“Here’s the thing: Science doesn’t care about your opinion.”
A week after Breitbart News published a wildly inaccurate article chalking climate change up as a hoax, The Weather Channel decided to teach the hyper-conservative news outlet a thing or two about scientific fact.
In a post to its website, TWC called the Breitbart piece, which relied heavily on a story published in the Daily Mail, “a prime example of cherry picking, or pulling a single item out of context to build a misleading case.”
TWC’s scathing response features a video post in which atmospheric scientist Kait Parker breaks down each of Breitbart’s claims, including that “global land temperatures have plummeted.”
“Here’s the thing: Science doesn’t care about your opinion,” Parker says in the video. “Cherry picking and changing the facts will not change the future, not the fact ― note: fact, not opinion ― that the earth is warming.”
Here’s Parker’s full takedown:
“What’s worse” than the Breitbart story itself, Parker said, is the fact that the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology posted the story to Twitter.
That’s ridiculous but shouldn’t be surprising. The committee is chaired by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who has a long history of denying climate change, attacking those who accept the scientific consensus and defending the fossil fuel industry. (Also unsurprisingly, the congressman has received more than $693,000 from the oil and gas industry over the course of his career.)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was among those who mocked the House science committee for circulating the story.
More: Weather Channel Destroys Breitbart Over BS Climate Change Story
Thank you, Kait, for debunking this nonsense. We are living in a sad time of dishonesty and fake news.
Oh, well if the weather girl on TV says so...
What I can understand at this stage...
What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....
We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories...
On this forum we have answered every single question brought up and they go into a loop of making bogus claims we refute and they come with another bogus claim and keep going until they get back to the first one....
There has to be something about credibility... Has the denier group got a claim which we can't refute based on actual science. We have shown our data time and time again...
Asking for detailed proof and choosing to be stupid when you get a detailed answer is not a defense....
So give us again... One shot your best defense for your case... We shoot it down can we just win...
Stop the deluge of bogus crap, just your one best shot...
What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....
We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories..
Everybody except gullible fools understands that "climate change"(aka "global warming" "aka global cooling") is a conspiracy theory designed purely to defraud people out of money and power. It is up to people who hold a theory to prove it's truth and that simply hasn't happened. It hasn't even come close to happening. Nor is it ever going to happen. If you wish to believe that the sky is falling or that you can lay hands on your TV and be healed if you will just send in $19.95 as a "love offering" and vote away your freedom of choice more power to you; just don't expect anything but laughter from me.Climate has always changed, and it will continue to change forever, well at least until the Son returns.
So why are we listening to a weather girl?
Climate change is a hoax.
I am sure the temperature is doing something and probably humans are not helping..... but it's no way as bad as they make it out. So the scare tactics and government boon doggle is what makes it a hoax. Now we are just transferring wealth back to 3rd world countries thanks to the Paris deal. Which is a joke.
The only scary thing right now is that Ivanka Trump is making this something she cares about ..... why can't she care about human trafficking or some other actual problem?
Three posts later and not one piece of refutable evidence....
There is plenty of evidence that the Climate is change rapidly and humans are causing it. We can do things to slow it down and possibly reverse it.
I asked for actual evidence and all we are getting is conspiracy theories, denial and we can't do anything.... Experts in this field have been consistent...
The solution for a problem is not to ignore it. Some people talk about giving debt to their children, how would explain screwing up the planet because you ignored the problem...
So second chance, Show us your best argument, just one and we can move to the next point of the conversation, a solution.
There is plenty of evidence that the Climate is change rapidly and humans are causing it.
What is the proper rate of change? Because you'd need that to show that recent change is rapid.
Where is your proof that without humans, the change would have been less or slower?
We can do things to slow it down and possibly reverse it.
You mean waste trillions on windmills? Or cripple our economies to reduce temps in 2080 by 0.1 degree?
When you get a chance, post the correct "average global temperature", so we know what target we're aiming for.
Its happening to fast its happening to fast...
Yea tell us teddy what is the proper way for change child?
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.live...ulated.html?client=ms-android-boost-us&espv=1
What caused the Great Sahara desert to change from tropical to dry in only a few hundred years?
At the end of the last Ice Age, the Sahara Desert was just as dry and uninviting as it is today. But sandwiched between two periods of extreme dryness were a few millennia of plentiful rainfall and lush vegetation.
During these few thousand years, prehistoric humans left the congested Nile Valley and established settlements around rain pools, green valleys, and rivers.
The ancient climate shift and its effects are detailed in the July 21 issue of the journal Science.
When the rains came
Some 12,000 years ago, the only place to live along the eastern Sahara Desert was the Nile Valley. Being so crowded, prime real estate in the Nile Valley was difficult to come by. Disputes over land were often settled with the fist, as evidenced by the cemetery of Jebel Sahaba where many of the buried individuals had died a violent death.
But around 10,500 years ago, a sudden burst of monsoon rains over the vast desert transformed the region into habitable land.
This opened the door for humans to move into the area, as evidenced by the researcher's 500 new radiocarbon dates of human and animal remains from more than 150 excavation sites.
"The climate change at [10,500 years ago] which turned most of the [3.8 million square mile] large Sahara into a savannah-type environment happened within a few hundred years only, certainly within less than 500 years," said study team member Stefan Kroepelin of the University of Cologne in Germany.
