Weather Channel Destroys Breitbart Over BS Climate Change Story

[EvilCat Breath]

The founder of the weather channel knows that global warming is a hoax.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex...annel-founder/amp?client=ms-android-sprint-us

 

[percysunshine]

I remember when the Weather Channel did weather reports.

.
Fear mongering brings in more advertising revenue than the weather. Only farmers, commuters, and sailors are willing to pay for weather information.

Think of it as science porn.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Cowboy Ted keeps declaring that no one has posted any 'evidence' yet, which he could have found himself if he WANTED to, but HERE IT IS:

----------------------------------

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
Forbes:
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming

NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud

300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging ‘Climate Change’ Data…
300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging 'Climate Change' Data...

Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions

Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered
Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered

NOAA’s climate change science fiction
The environmental intelligence agency ignores satellite data
LAMAR SMITH: NOAA’s climate change science fiction

Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming
Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming

Scientists published climate change research under fake names. Then they were caught.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=18&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwil9bfblOLQAhUo5YMKHfBVCgs4ChAWCGEwBw&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/09/19/scientists-published-climate-research-under-fake-names-then-they-were-caught/&usg=AFQjCNEgguhI4M_4QDYGw3bO8i0rr3huZg

Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead
Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead Of Paris | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

Fake Data—How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived
Fake Data&#151How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived.

Global Warming "Science": New Study Reveals Large Temperature Fabrication By Cherry-Pick
C3

...and there is SO MUCH MORE....

---------------

My prediction is that libs / Cowboy Ted's 1st reaction is to make a snide comment about the sources not being credible (because they say so...)

Now Easy,

Pick your best one from that list and use it...

We are going to credibility issue... We disprove your best...

We have done this before and disproved all of these and you just go back to posting a post like this...

So read your links and give us your best one...

This should be easy for you, you got a list there, just pick your best one...

We disprove that one and we can question the credibility of the whole list...

We might be generous and allow you a second try after we dispelled your first one, but lets do this in scientific way.

So what's your best shot.... If you think it is climategate, go for it, pick one up there and we can discuss it.

You have never disprove anything you wacko AGW cult guy you...

 

[LaDexter]

Why does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9 times the ice of the other?

If you cannot answer that question, you have no clue what you are talking/parroting.


In 2005, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely no warming in the atmosphere. Solution - fudge both with uncorrelated "corrections."

This is a total hoax.

What is really causing the Marshall Islands to sink while only two other island chains on Earth are also "sinking?"

Hint - actual ocean rise would sink everything, not just three island chains in the Pacific....

 

[Wyatt earp]

Cowboy Ted keeps declaring that no one has posted any 'evidence' yet, which he could have found himself if he WANTED to, but HERE IT IS:

----------------------------------

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
Forbes:
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming

NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud

300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging ‘Climate Change’ Data…
300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging 'Climate Change' Data...

Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions

Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered
Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered

NOAA’s climate change science fiction
The environmental intelligence agency ignores satellite data
LAMAR SMITH: NOAA’s climate change science fiction

Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming
Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming

Scientists published climate change research under fake names. Then they were caught.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=18&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwil9bfblOLQAhUo5YMKHfBVCgs4ChAWCGEwBw&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/09/19/scientists-published-climate-research-under-fake-names-then-they-were-caught/&usg=AFQjCNEgguhI4M_4QDYGw3bO8i0rr3huZg

Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead
Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead Of Paris | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

Fake Data—How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived
Fake Data&#151How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived.

Global Warming "Science": New Study Reveals Large Temperature Fabrication By Cherry-Pick
C3

...and there is SO MUCH MORE....

---------------

My prediction is that libs / Cowboy Ted's 1st reaction is to make a snide comment about the sources not being credible (because they say so...)

Now Easy,

Pick your best one from that list and use it...

We are going to credibility issue... We disprove your best...

We have done this before and disproved all of these and you just go back to posting a post like this...

So read your links and give us your best one...

This should be easy for you, you got a list there, just pick your best one...

We disprove that one and we can question the credibility of the whole list...

We might be generous and allow you a second try after we dispelled your first one, but lets do this in scientific way.

So what's your best shot.... If you think it is climategate, go for it, pick one up there and we can discuss it.

You have never disprove anything you wacko AGW cult guy you...

And teddy try to disprove this:




Move over Naomi Klien here is another...

Naomi Klein~the man made climate change cult finnaly being honest

Like I have said the AGW cult don't even try to hide it anymore...



Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare


Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive BehindWarming Scare

3/29/2016


Fraud: While the global warming alarmists have done a good job of spreading fright, they haven’t been so good at hiding their real motivation. Yet another one has slipped up and revealed the catalyst driving the climate scare.

We have been told now for almost three decades that man has to change his ways or his fossil-fuel emissions will scorch Earth with catastrophic warming. Scientists, politicians and activists have maintained the narrative that their concern is only about caring for our planet and its inhabitants. But this is simply not true. The narrative is a ruse. They are after something entirely different.


If they were honest, the climate alarmists would admit that they are not working feverishly to hold down global temperatures — they would acknowledge that they are instead consumed with the goal of holding down capitalism and establishing a global welfare state.

Have doubts? Then listen to the words of former United Nations climate official Ottmar Edenhofer:


“One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole,” said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.

So what is the goal of environmental policy?

“We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy,” said Edenhofer.

For those who want to believe that maybe Edenhofer just misspoke and doesn’t really mean that, consider that a little more than five years ago he also said that “the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated.”

Mad as they are, Edenhofer’s comments are nevertheless consistent with other alarmists who have spilled the movement’s dirty secret. Last year, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, made a similar statement.

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said in anticipation of last year’s Paris climate summit.

“This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

The plan is to allow Third World countries to emit as much carbon dioxide as they wish — because, as Edenhofer said, “in order to get rich one has to burn coal, oil or gas” — while at the same time restricting emissions in advanced nations. This will, of course, choke economic growth in developed nations, but they deserve that fate as they “have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community,” he said. The fanaticism runs so deep that one professor has even suggested that we

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

“Cherry picking and changing the facts will not change the future"

A warmer complaining about cherry picking. LOL!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What I can understand at this stage...

What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....

We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories...

On this forum we have answered every single question brought up and they go into a loop of making bogus claims we refute and they come with another bogus claim and keep going until they get back to the first one....

There has to be something about credibility... Has the denier group got a claim which we can't refute based on actual science. We have shown our data time and time again...

Asking for detailed proof and choosing to be stupid when you get a detailed answer is not a defense....

So give us again... One shot your best defense for your case... We shoot it down can we just win...

Stop the deluge of bogus crap, just your one best shot...

What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....

We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories..

Everybody except gullible fools understands that "climate change"(aka "global warming" "aka global cooling") is a conspiracy theory designed purely to defraud people out of money and power. It is up to people who hold a theory to prove it's truth and that simply hasn't happened. It hasn't even come close to happening. Nor is it ever going to happen. If you wish to believe that the sky is falling or that you can lay hands on your TV and be healed if you will just send in $19.95 as a "love offering" and vote away your freedom of choice more power to you; just don't expect anything but laughter from me.

Climate has always changed, and it will continue to change forever, well at least until the Son returns.

So why are we listening to a weather girl?

Climate change is a hoax.

I am sure the temperature is doing something and probably humans are not helping..... but it's no way as bad as they make it out. So the scare tactics and government boon doggle is what makes it a hoax. Now we are just transferring wealth back to 3rd world countries thanks to the Paris deal. Which is a joke.

The only scary thing right now is that Ivanka Trump is making this something she cares about ..... why can't she care about human trafficking or some other actual problem?

Three posts later and not one piece of refutable evidence....

There is plenty of evidence that the Climate is change rapidly and humans are causing it. We can do things to slow it down and possibly reverse it.

I asked for actual evidence and all we are getting is conspiracy theories, denial and we can't do anything.... Experts in this field have been consistent...

The solution for a problem is not to ignore it. Some people talk about giving debt to their children, how would explain screwing up the planet because you ignored the problem...

So second chance, Show us your best argument, just one and we can move to the next point of the conversation, a solution.

There is plenty of evidence that the Climate is change rapidly and humans are causing it.

What is the proper rate of change? Because you'd need that to show that recent change is rapid.
Where is your proof that without humans, the change would have been less or slower?

We can do things to slow it down and possibly reverse it.

You mean waste trillions on windmills? Or cripple our economies to reduce temps in 2080 by 0.1 degree?

When you get a chance, post the correct "average global temperature", so we know what target we're aiming for.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Speaking of "Science".... nobody has ever proven that man has any effect on the climate. Even after 40-plus years of insisting he must have had something to do with it, not a bit of proof.

The climate has been changing for as long as the Earth has existed. Or for as long as it's had a climate, at least.

Sometimes the climate gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-five years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Gee, the climate changes... don't they teach you that in like first grade? What a bunch of nitwits these AGW nutters.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What I can understand at this stage...

What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....

We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories...

On this forum we have answered every single question brought up and they go into a loop of making bogus claims we refute and they come with another bogus claim and keep going until they get back to the first one....

There has to be something about credibility... Has the denier group got a claim which we can't refute based on actual science. We have shown our data time and time again...

Asking for detailed proof and choosing to be stupid when you get a detailed answer is not a defense....

So give us again... One shot your best defense for your case... We shoot it down can we just win...

Stop the deluge of bogus crap, just your one best shot...

What are the deniers trying to say?
Are they denying that climate is changing at a pretty volatile way OR
It is happening but Man has nothing to do with it....

We can't live our lives adhering to conspiracy theories..

Everybody except gullible fools understands that "climate change"(aka "global warming" "aka global cooling") is a conspiracy theory designed purely to defraud people out of money and power. It is up to people who hold a theory to prove it's truth and that simply hasn't happened. It hasn't even come close to happening. Nor is it ever going to happen. If you wish to believe that the sky is falling or that you can lay hands on your TV and be healed if you will just send in $19.95 as a "love offering" and vote away your freedom of choice more power to you; just don't expect anything but laughter from me.

Climate has always changed, and it will continue to change forever, well at least until the Son returns.

So why are we listening to a weather girl?

Climate change is a hoax.

I am sure the temperature is doing something and probably humans are not helping..... but it's no way as bad as they make it out. So the scare tactics and government boon doggle is what makes it a hoax. Now we are just transferring wealth back to 3rd world countries thanks to the Paris deal. Which is a joke.

The only scary thing right now is that Ivanka Trump is making this something she cares about ..... why can't she care about human trafficking or some other actual problem?

Three posts later and not one piece of refutable evidence....

There is plenty of evidence that the Climate is change rapidly and humans are causing it. We can do things to slow it down and possibly reverse it.

I asked for actual evidence and all we are getting is conspiracy theories, denial and we can't do anything.... Experts in this field have been consistent...

The solution for a problem is not to ignore it. Some people talk about giving debt to their children, how would explain screwing up the planet because you ignored the problem...

So second chance, Show us your best argument, just one and we can move to the next point of the conversation, a solution.

There is plenty of evidence that the Climate is change rapidly and humans are causing it.

What is the proper rate of change? Because you'd need that to show that recent change is rapid.
Where is your proof that without humans, the change would have been less or slower?

We can do things to slow it down and possibly reverse it.

You mean waste trillions on windmills? Or cripple our economies to reduce temps in 2080 by 0.1 degree?

When you get a chance, post the correct "average global temperature", so we know what target we're aiming for.

Its happening to fast its happening to fast...

Yea tell us teddy what is the proper way for change child?





https://www.google.com/amp/amp.live...ulated.html?client=ms-android-boost-us&espv=1

What caused the Great Sahara desert to change from tropical to dry in only a few hundred years?




At the end of the last Ice Age, the Sahara Desert was just as dry and uninviting as it is today. But sandwiched between two periods of extreme dryness were a few millennia of plentiful rainfall and lush vegetation.



During these few thousand years, prehistoric humans left the congested Nile Valley and established settlements around rain pools, green valleys, and rivers.

The ancient climate shift and its effects are detailed in the July 21 issue of the journal Science.




When the rains came

Some 12,000 years ago, the only place to live along the eastern Sahara Desert was the Nile Valley. Being so crowded, prime real estate in the Nile Valley was difficult to come by. Disputes over land were often settled with the fist, as evidenced by the cemetery of Jebel Sahaba where many of the buried individuals had died a violent death.

But around 10,500 years ago, a sudden burst of monsoon rains over the vast desert transformed the region into habitable land.

This opened the door for humans to move into the area, as evidenced by the researcher's 500 new radiocarbon dates of human and animal remains from more than 150 excavation sites.

"The climate change at [10,500 years ago] which turned most of the [3.8 million square mile] large Sahara into a savannah-type environment happened within a few hundred years only, certainly within less than 500 years," said study team member Stefan Kroepelin of the University of Cologne in Germany.

 

[easyt65]

The number of hurricanes - and devastating hurricanes - will greatly increase due to climate change
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry

"Climate scientists predict that hurricanes will become more forceful as well, fueled primarily by warmer sea temperatures in the tropics. For the past few years we've been told we were all going to die from increased hurricanes...which has NOT happened."
Climate change makes hurricanes, and predicting them, more challenging, expert says - The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

---------------------------

Another Down Year in USA For Tornadoes & Major Hurricanes
'We are on pace for one of the quietest tornadoes years in the last decade and with respect to land falling major hurricanes in the US, an unprecedented streak in the record-keeping era continues through yet another tropical season.'


"Whether you’re talking about major (category 3, 4 or 5) hurricanes or tornadoes, there is good news this year for the US in that – similar to most recent years – these extreme weather-related events are down across the nation compared-to-normal. In fact, in the case of tornadoes, we are on pace for one of the quietest years in the last decade and with respect to land falling major hurricanes in the US, an unprecedented streak in the record-keeping era continues through yet another tropical season."

Another Down Year in USA For Tornadoes & Major Hurricanes

--------------------------

NOA, one of the Global Warming 'Doom Sayers' who were predicting the large increase in disastrous hurricanes due to Global Warming was FORCED to admit their predictions were BULLSHIT:

NOAA: Number of major tornadoes in 2015 was ‘one of the lowest on record’ – Tornadoes below average for 4th year in a row

------------------------

Despite Denial, Global Temperatures Are Dropping Fast
- All global temperature data sets confirm that global temperature has fallen rapidly in recent months as the recent El Nino ended.
Despite Denial, Global Temperatures Are Dropping Fast | The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

 

[easyt65]

The Global Warming 'FEAR-MONGERING' is scientifically UNFOUNDED!

-----

PROF. ROGER PIELKE JR: TESTIMONY ON THE CURRENT STATE OF WEATHER EXTREMES: ‘It is misleading, and just plain incorrect, to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally’

'It is further incorrect to associate the increasing costs of disasters with the emission of greenhouse gases'

Globally, weather-related losses ($) have not increased since 1990 as a proportion of GDP (they have actually decreased by about 25%) and insured catastrophe losses have not increased as a proportion of GDP since 1960.

• Hurricanes have not increased in the US in frequency, intensity or normalized damage since at least 1900. The same holds for tropical cyclones globally since at least 1970 (when data allows for a global perspective).

• Floods have not increased in the US in frequency or intensity since at least 1950. Flood losses as a percentage of US GDP have dropped by about 75% since 1940.

• Tornadoes have not increased in frequency, intensity or normalized damage since 1950, and there is some evidence to suggest that they have actually declined.

• Drought has “for the most part, become shorter, less frequent, and cover a smaller portion of the U. S. over the last century.” Globally, “there has been little change in drought over the past 60 years.”

PROF. ROGER PIELKE JR: TESTIMONY ON THE CURRENT STATE OF WEATHER EXTREMES: 'It is misleading, and just plain incorrect, to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally'

 

[CowboyTed]

Cowboy Ted keeps declaring that no one has posted any 'evidence' yet, which he could have found himself if he WANTED to, but HERE IT IS:

----------------------------------

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
Forbes:
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming
Fakegate: The Obnoxious Fabrication of Global Warming

NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud

300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging ‘Climate Change’ Data…
300 Scientists Blast NOAA For Fudging 'Climate Change' Data...

Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions

Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered
Almost All US Temperature Data Used In Global Warming Models Is Estimated or Altered

NOAA’s climate change science fiction
The environmental intelligence agency ignores satellite data
LAMAR SMITH: NOAA’s climate change science fiction

Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming
Report: Temperature Data Being Faked to Show Global Warming

Scientists published climate change research under fake names. Then they were caught.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=18&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwil9bfblOLQAhUo5YMKHfBVCgs4ChAWCGEwBw&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/09/19/scientists-published-climate-research-under-fake-names-then-they-were-caught/&usg=AFQjCNEgguhI4M_4QDYGw3bO8i0rr3huZg

Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead
Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead Of Paris | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

Fake Data—How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived
Fake Data&#151How the Hockey Stick Graph Was Contrived.

Global Warming "Science": New Study Reveals Large Temperature Fabrication By Cherry-Pick
C3

...and there is SO MUCH MORE....

---------------

My prediction is that libs / Cowboy Ted's 1st reaction is to make a snide comment about the sources not being credible (because they say so...)

I stated at the start that we go around circles with a deluge of fake science...

I am asking for your best piece of evidence, I would hope it has been peer reviewed and fact checked for your own sake...

I just not getting drawn into a abusive discussion of conspiracy theories and fake science...

Please on your side pick your best article to prove your case... I am not going to do what I did we ye before and disprove the first three and act like an idiot...

Here is my proof...

IPCC Fifth Assessment Report

This is peer reviewed and has openly discussed any imperfections in its report... Can you offer real evidence to disprove the leading scientists in the world?

Now can you give a scientific basis for objecting to this... This is the best thinking from a very large group of experts in the field....

Please don't give and article from someone with no climate knowledge, argue science with science...

Even the leading Climate skeptics are saying the Earth is warming at an alarming rate, they had too, the evidence is overwhelming...

 

[LaDexter]

Here is my proof...

PARROTING is NOT "proof" of anything except that you have a BIRDBRAIN.

Answer the question:

WHY does one Earth polar circle have 9 times the ice of the other?

 

[CowboyTed]

Here is my proof...

PARROTING is NOT "proof" of anything except that you have a BIRDBRAIN.

Answer the question:

WHY does one Earth polar circle have 9 times the ice of the other?

I used a report to prove my position, that is how science works....

Without checking the exact number but one is on land and the other is in the sea... The one on land is colder... There is whole documentaries on this and it has nothing to do with climate change mainly...

 

[LaDexter]

Without checking the exact number but one is on land and the other is in the sea... The one on land is colder... There is whole documentaries on this and it has nothing to do with climate change mainly...

... because Ted's BIRDBRAIN can only PARROT, never THINK....


90% of Earth ice on LAND MASS Antarctica.
7% of Earth ice on LAND MASS Greenland

97% of Earth ice on the two land masses closest to an Earth pole.... and land MOVES....

Ted, if Earth had two polar oceans, how much ice would it have???

 

[easyt65]

I am asking for your best piece of evidence, I would hope it has been peer reviewed and fact checked for your own sake...

I posted it now...twice....and all of it discredits what you have claimed, what your scientists who support the scam has said - it even has 'your' scientists ADMITTING their predictions and data was / is wrong.

'Hurricane Terror'?! Hasn't happened - the lowest in 50 - 60 years! Even NOA was forced to admit it. It's all speculative bullshit faked, altered, and packaged in 'fear-mongering' to sell an agenda, a belief that has been disproven and discredited.

The people with whom you seek to discredit my links have already been discredited, AND they have come forward to admit it.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Is this God sending us the people to help us and we refusing help

Yep. But you keep listening to your liberal "prophets." The end is near, unless you give all your money to the godvernment.

 

[Claudette]

“Here’s the thing: Science doesn’t care about your opinion.”

A week after Breitbart News published a wildly inaccurate article chalking climate change up as a hoax, The Weather Channel decided to teach the hyper-conservative news outlet a thing or two about scientific fact.

In a post to its website, TWC called the Breitbart piece, which relied heavily on a story published in the Daily Mail, “a prime example of cherry picking, or pulling a single item out of context to build a misleading case.”

TWC’s scathing response features a video post in which atmospheric scientist Kait Parker breaks down each of Breitbart’s claims, including that “global land temperatures have plummeted.”

“Here’s the thing: Science doesn’t care about your opinion,” Parker says in the video. “Cherry picking and changing the facts will not change the future, not the fact ― note: fact, not opinion ― that the earth is warming.”

Here’s Parker’s full takedown:



“What’s worse” than the Breitbart story itself, Parker said, is the fact that the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology posted the story to Twitter.

That’s ridiculous but shouldn’t be surprising. The committee is chaired by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who has a long history of denying climate change, attacking those who accept the scientific consensus and defending the fossil fuel industry. (Also unsurprisingly, the congressman has received more than $693,000 from the oil and gas industry over the course of his career.)

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was among those who mocked the House science committee for circulating the story.

More: Weather Channel Destroys Breitbart Over BS Climate Change Story

Thank you, Kait, for debunking this nonsense. We are living in a sad time of dishonesty and fake news.

Ahh. Who besides you gives a flying shit??

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Take my word for it,

Sorry, no.