Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #121
For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
This is exactly why a good handful of the Found Fathers were wary of ever including a Bill of Rights in the first place. They knew future generations would foolishly interpret that only the rights specifically enumerated were rights to the exclusion of all others. It seems their fears were justified.
Like making stuff up ?
I am simply stating a fact.
If it were a constitutionaly protected right, there would be no court battles going on right now.
Just because some judge says it......does not make it so.
The fact that some would like it to be that way is what the Founders were wary of.
Have a day.
I am sorry? What exactly am I making up again? Quite a few of the Founding Fathers were very wary of supporting a Bill of Rights for the exact same reasons I mentioned above.
The 9th Amendment states: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The fact you don't believe court battles are not going on that concern constitutionally protected rights is quite shockingly ignorant on your part.
Somehow you seem to be wanting to say that marriage is a "civil right" (not that such things really exist). But just going with the idea that they are somehow assumed to exist....marriage isn't one of them.
Using the 9th in your argument does what for you ? Answer: Nothing. There is no list of rights retained by the people. That is the whole basis for the current discussion or argument (as the case may be). It is not a universally accepted, constitutionaly protected right.
Free speech is a constitutionally protected right. Court battles take place over whether or not something (such as porn) constitutes free speech.
Marriage is not in the same category.
You should be careful about accusing others of being ignorant when it is quit apparent you are pretty much in the dark yourself.
I never accused you of being ignorant. Funny enough though your own posts do that all by themselves.
Can you can claim all you wish that marriage isn't a right but countless legal scholars and precedents set by the courts disagree. They are on my side concerning this issue save a few courts. All you have his hand wringing and teeth gnashing. I wonder which holds more legal sway? lol
You didn't say "shockingly ignorant on your part" ? It's right there for everyone to see.
As for the rest. I don't need to claim anything beyond what I have already said. Marriage is not in the same category as other constitutionally protected rights.
Can't help that.
For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
We're not discussing your marriage here.
Still simmering over that ass kicking?For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
Congrats to aaronleland as well, no more hiding in the closet.
For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
We're not discussing your marriage here.
I'm married to a female, the ways it's supposed to be. If you think otherwise, you and your marriage are both abnormal.
Here is your wedding present. .....![]()
![]()
I wonder if racism causes homophobia or if its the other way around?Congrats to aaronleland as well, no more hiding in the closet.
And just think, if homophobia is recognized as a mental disorder, you can come out of yours.
You couldn't kick your own ass BOY and I mean BOY in more ways than one.Still simmering over that ass kicking?For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
No stupid for getting married.
For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
We're not discussing your marriage here.
I'm married to a female, the ways it's supposed to be. If you think otherwise, you and your marriage are both abnormal.
A female what? Thats suspiciously vague.
There are lots of females. Be specific or are you hiding something.....abnormal?For what, supporting abnormality.Congrats.
We're not discussing your marriage here.
I'm married to a female, the ways it's supposed to be. If you think otherwise, you and your marriage are both abnormal.
A female what? Thats suspiciously vague.
A female. If that's hard to grasp, it's no wonder you support fags marrying.
Howey will be now known to all as "Mary".Florida will soon enter the 21st Century!
A U.S. appeals court panel ruled Wednesday that a judicial stay in Florida's federal gay-marriage case will expire Jan. 5, ensuring that same-sex couples would be allowed to marry in the state the following day.
"This is a clear victory for us because it finds the harm is being done to the people, not the state," said Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, which is representing same-sex couples from throughout Florida and gay-rights group SAVE, who sued to have out-of-state same-sex marriages recognized in the Sunshine State.
U.S. Judge Robert L. Hinkle of Tallahassee ruled Aug. 21 that Florida's gay marriage ban, passed by voters in 2008, is unconstitutional. He stayed his decision while Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi appealed his decision, but said the stay would expire on Jan. 5.
Howey will be now known to all as "Mary".Florida will soon enter the 21st Century!
A U.S. appeals court panel ruled Wednesday that a judicial stay in Florida's federal gay-marriage case will expire Jan. 5, ensuring that same-sex couples would be allowed to marry in the state the following day.
"This is a clear victory for us because it finds the harm is being done to the people, not the state," said Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, which is representing same-sex couples from throughout Florida and gay-rights group SAVE, who sued to have out-of-state same-sex marriages recognized in the Sunshine State.
U.S. Judge Robert L. Hinkle of Tallahassee ruled Aug. 21 that Florida's gay marriage ban, passed by voters in 2008, is unconstitutional. He stayed his decision while Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi appealed his decision, but said the stay would expire on Jan. 5.
Do you prefer I wipe before you kiss?Howey will be now known to all as "Mary".Florida will soon enter the 21st Century!
A U.S. appeals court panel ruled Wednesday that a judicial stay in Florida's federal gay-marriage case will expire Jan. 5, ensuring that same-sex couples would be allowed to marry in the state the following day.
"This is a clear victory for us because it finds the harm is being done to the people, not the state," said Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, which is representing same-sex couples from throughout Florida and gay-rights group SAVE, who sued to have out-of-state same-sex marriages recognized in the Sunshine State.
U.S. Judge Robert L. Hinkle of Tallahassee ruled Aug. 21 that Florida's gay marriage ban, passed by voters in 2008, is unconstitutional. He stayed his decision while Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi appealed his decision, but said the stay would expire on Jan. 5.
Make that Queen Mary, then bow before me and spread 'em, asshole.
is there something you are not telling people? How long have you had this issue?