WH Won’t Allow Fauci To Testify In Front Of House Next Week, Claims It Would Be ‘Counterproductive’

Well, what I do know now is that you don't have an answer for that because the Executive branch has equal protections from the abuses other branches of government. Maybe you've heard of it.
How is seeking Fauci's testimony an abuse?
How is it they need to talk to him outside of just sending a request for information not enough?

Do you understand the purpose of warrants? Do you know what they specifically do?
Congress seeking testimony is not the adversarial action this admin has made it out to be. In the past it has been considered routine in most cases. But because this admin takes every opportunity to turn normal requests in to confrontations you have forgotten what a normal admin typically does and does not do.

Bottom line............there is no legit reason to keep Fauci from testifying. If you weren't a brain dead zombie you could see that.
WTF do they want to ask him?
 
You had unlimited resources and money to get him and you failed.
That's a lie on two levels. Documents and witness testimony was illegally withheld so not all the evidence was made available. The evidence that was available unequivocally showed Trump's guilt, but loyalist Repubs in the Senate voted to acquit anyway..................fearing the wrath of the brainwashed Following.


What "evidence"? There was no evidence presented by the House managers at all. What testimony? I heard the witnesses, Kent, Taylor, Vindman, etc. None of them saw President Trump do anything at all, they just gave their opinions. Opinions aren't evidence, particularly when they are opinions from people that were kept out of the loop and were butt hurt over it.

In actuality, the House Managers failed completely in presenting proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump was guilty of anything. So Mr. Trump was exonerated, and with jeopardy attached, the matter can never be brought up again.
House managers cite 'overwhelming' evidence against Trump in their brief to Senate

 
President Donald Trump is refusing to let National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, who also serves on the White House COVID-19 task force, testify before a House subcommittee hearing scheduled for next week.

White House spokesperson Judd Deere confirmed to the Washington Post on Friday that Fauci would not be allowed to appear in front of the the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies on Wednesday.

“While the Trump Administration continues its whole-of-government response to COVID-19, including safely opening up America again and expediting vaccine development, it is counterproductive to have the very individuals involved in those efforts appearing at congressional hearings,” Deere said. “We are committed to working with Congress to offer testimony at the appropriate time.”
.............................................................................................................................................................
So.............Tony has time to attend Don's televised, daily campaign events.........sorry...........COVID briefings.............where he is forced to watch Capt. Clorox recommend injecting disinfectant but he doesn't have time for congressional testimony?

It's a sign of Don's faith in the devotion of his minions that he would do something so transparent to keep the truth from the public while having no concern over The Following's continued blind loyalty.

He will testify before the Senate. House Democrats are non-essential.
 
Well, what I do know now is that you don't have an answer for that because the Executive branch has equal protections from the abuses other branches of government. Maybe you've heard of it.
How is seeking Fauci's testimony an abuse?
How is it they need to talk to him outside of just sending a request for information not enough?

Do you understand the purpose of warrants? Do you know what they specifically do?
Congress seeking testimony is not the adversarial action this admin has made it out to be. In the past it has been considered routine in most cases. But because this admin takes every opportunity to turn normal requests in to confrontations you have forgotten what a normal admin typically does and does not do.

Bottom line............there is no legit reason to keep Fauci from testifying. If you weren't a brain dead zombie you could see that.
Holy shit. Have you not seen these so called hearings over the last three years? It’s a goddam democrat clown show.
 
Well, what I do know now is that you don't have an answer for that because the Executive branch has equal protections from the abuses other branches of government. Maybe you've heard of it.
How is seeking Fauci's testimony an abuse?
How is it they need to talk to him outside of just sending a request for information not enough?

Do you understand the purpose of warrants? Do you know what they specifically do?
Congress seeking testimony is not the adversarial action this admin has made it out to be. In the past it has been considered routine in most cases. But because this admin takes every opportunity to turn normal requests in to confrontations you have forgotten what a normal admin typically does and does not do.

Bottom line............there is no legit reason to keep Fauci from testifying. If you weren't a brain dead zombie you could see that.
By its very nature, it is adversarial. I'm sure you can show a link to where in the past it is considered routine. However, you failed to answer why it is that Congress can't just send Fauci a letter asking for the information they want.
 
You had unlimited resources and money to get him and you failed.
That's a lie on two levels. Documents and witness testimony was illegally withheld so not all the evidence was made available. The evidence that was available unequivocally showed Trump's guilt, but loyalist Repubs in the Senate voted to acquit anyway..................fearing the wrath of the brainwashed Following.


What "evidence"? There was no evidence presented by the House managers at all. What testimony? I heard the witnesses, Kent, Taylor, Vindman, etc. None of them saw President Trump do anything at all, they just gave their opinions. Opinions aren't evidence, particularly when they are opinions from people that were kept out of the loop and were butt hurt over it.

In actuality, the House Managers failed completely in presenting proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump was guilty of anything. So Mr. Trump was exonerated, and with jeopardy attached, the matter can never be brought up again.
House managers cite 'overwhelming' evidence against Trump in their brief to Senate



An argument or brief stating that you have "overwhelming evidence" isn't the same as actually presenting overwhelming evidence.
 
President Donald Trump is refusing to let National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, who also serves on the White House COVID-19 task force, testify before a House subcommittee hearing scheduled for next week.

White House spokesperson Judd Deere confirmed to the Washington Post on Friday that Fauci would not be allowed to appear in front of the the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies on Wednesday.

“While the Trump Administration continues its whole-of-government response to COVID-19, including safely opening up America again and expediting vaccine development, it is counterproductive to have the very individuals involved in those efforts appearing at congressional hearings,” Deere said. “We are committed to working with Congress to offer testimony at the appropriate time.”
.............................................................................................................................................................
So.............Tony has time to attend Don's televised, daily campaign events.........sorry...........COVID briefings.............where he is forced to watch Capt. Clorox recommend injecting disinfectant but he doesn't have time for congressional testimony?

It's a sign of Don's faith in the devotion of his minions that he would do something so transparent to keep the truth from the public while having no concern over The Following's continued blind loyalty.
Why would he need to testify in front of Congress? Has a crime been committed? Not that Congress is in the Judicial branch anyway.

Total waste of time.
 
In tea bagger trumpoholic world questioning taxpayer-paid public employees by elected officials is a bad thing.
 
In tea bagger trumpoholic world questioning taxpayer-paid public employees by elected officials is a bad thing.
Right. Only in Trumpworld is Congress going about its normal course of business considered to automatically be adversarial. Why? Because this admin has so much damaging material to hide from the public.
 
Why doesn't Congress just send Fauci a letter asking for the information?
 

Forum List

Back
Top