🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

What are your attitudes about Homosexuals?

What are your attitudes about Homosexuals?

  • I hate them all

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • Homosexuals should be jailed or exiled

    Votes: 2 1.9%
  • They should have no special protections

    Votes: 31 29.5%
  • They should be protected under Civil Rights laws

    Votes: 28 26.7%
  • They should be allowed to have Civil Unions only

    Votes: 16 15.2%
  • They should be allowed to marry

    Votes: 22 21.0%
  • They should be protected from any discrimination

    Votes: 27 25.7%
  • Who cares?

    Votes: 30 28.6%

  • Total voters
    105
  • Poll closed .
Homosexuals deserve equal but not special treatment. I can live with legal unions, but not legal marriages for homosexuals.

That wouldn't be equal. In fact, that would actually be "separate but equal" and that's unconstitutional.

I can live with legal unions for heterosexuals...if that's what you want to "grant" gays and lesbians. If you get civil marriage, gays get civil marriage. THAT is equal.
 
1. Your wrong, I want no harm to come to anyone. Of course I can't speak for homophobes as I am not one

Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.
 
1. Your wrong, I want no harm to come to anyone. Of course I can't speak for homophobes as I am not one

Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.

Anyone seeking to open the eyes of the obsessed is always a phobe to the obsessed and their enablers.

You, being a member of the obsessed category requires me to be a phobe even though it's a false assertion.

Understandable but sad
 
God created us all, yes, but I don't believe that people being homosexual are of his doing. Why would he go against his own word?

It's not his "word". The "word" you are referring to was written by men not god. If you believe in god, then your god created the gays just like everyone else. Either he's all powerful or he's not. Which is it?

The Landlord and the Gays
 
1. Your wrong, I want no harm to come to anyone. Of course I can't speak for homophobes as I am not one

Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.

Anyone seeking to open the eyes of the obsessed is always a phobe to the obsessed and their enablers.

You, being a member of the obsessed category requires me to be a phobe even though it's a false assertion.

Understandable but sad

Well lookee there...so much deflection in one post. Do you wish to keep gays and lesbians from legally marrying their consenting adult partner of choice, yes or no?
 
Did you go after Obama's bigotry a few short years ago when he said:


"I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage."

You voted for a bigot ! How could you live with yourself ?

Did President Obama come out in support of a single piece of anti gay legislation? Did President Obama ever support a single anti gay marriage amendment in any state? Did President Obama order that his justice department not defend DOMA? Did President Obama repeal DADT?

Actions speak louder than words.
 
The rapture may not come any time soon. This isn't the End Times. This is the time of the last days of the United States though. Civilizations do not survive the normalization of homosexuality. No country survives socialism. It's the perfect storm.

Too bad you cannot provide any credible substantiation for that ludicrous allegation.
 
You've got 21 posts with this one but I'll help you out -


ooops - those are all heteros. You phobes are hysterical about what consenting adults are doing but where's the outrage at the hypersexualization of little girls? How about middle school, high school and college cheerleaders?

I'm totally opposed to the exploitation of little girls. I think any parent who would willingly turn their little girl into a miniature slut deserves a good slap in the face. In my opinion, exploiting little kids is worse than the act of homosexuality.

Oh well, whoopee fucking shit for you.

And, a slap in the face, huh?

Boy, you're really hard line when it comes to pimping out little girls.



Every so often, I think I should give you a chance to prove you really are a Christian with a capital C but then you go and write shit like this and then, more shit like this:

They are born with sin nature. As much as I love little babies I know for a fact that they're only concerned for themselves and their own needs. At that age, it's necessary for survival but they cry when they want something or need something. They're born selfish. Left unchecked, they will remain selfish unless and until they are trained to think of others or the needs of others. So ... all humans are born with sin nature.

A newborn who isn't concerned for the needs of others?

Its not just that you're a phony. You're also just dumb.

I don't need to "prove" anything to you. I don't answer to folks swimming in the quicksand of sinful behavior.

So you think a mother who exploits her daughter with hooker garb and makeup should get the death penalty? Talk about "dumb!"

Newborns are self centered. Have you ever raised a baby? I love 'em with all my heart but they don't care if you're asleep at 2:00AM. They don't care if you're in a restaurant. When they want something they're going to let you know it no matter what. Again, it's survival mode. They're totally dependent upon their parents but that doesn't make them any less self-centered. It's their nature.

As they age, it's up to the parents to teach right from wrong. I remember knowing the difference between right and wrong but choosing to do wrong when I was 3, 4 ,5 years old. I see other kids doing what they know is wrong as well (taking things that aren't theirs; hitting their sibling or another kid; throwing tantrums; etc.).

But if you want to go with this "gay gene" mentality/philosophy then you can't blame a murderer for being born with a "murder gene" or a thief for being born with a "theft gene" or an adulterer for being born with a "promiscuous gene." Hopefully the murderer, thief, and adulterer will overcome their sin nature. The sin nature that we're ALL born with.
 
1. Your wrong, I want no harm to come to anyone. Of course I can't speak for homophobes as I am not one

Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.

Merriam Webster: Straightphobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against normal, healthy sexual behavior or straight folks
 
1. Your wrong, I want no harm to come to anyone. Of course I can't speak for homophobes as I am not one

Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.

Merriam Webster: Straightphobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against normal, healthy sexual behavior or straight folks

And, naturally, you can name the legislation, designed by gays, that would discriminate against heterosexuals? No, you were just being silly...and really lame. If you were five, I'd praise your "cleverness". Are you five?
 
It depends on the homo themself, really. If some guy is a homo & doesn't feel the need to tell me about his bedroom biz, then that gives us a chance to interact like normal human beings do & see that there is more to each other & possibly be friends. As for the "look @ me! I'm gay! Oh Im so oppressed!" flamboyant types...that shit is just plain annoying & there is zero chance in hell that I will befriend him, I know all I need to know about that individual and his wearing of his "oppression" on his sleeve tells me he's a needy little faggot.
 
So satan isn't evil?

Ah, so you think Satan is responsible for gays and lesbians eh? Why? What did I do as a child to single me out for Satan's attention? I've been attracted to other girls since my earliest memories. Why would god or Satan single out a kid for their attentions? Why would god or Satan single out 4-6% of the population for additional "temptation"?
 
It depends on the homo themself, really. If some guy is a homo & doesn't feel the need to tell me about his bedroom biz, then that gives us a chance to interact like normal human beings do & see that there is more to each other & possibly be friends. As for the "look @ me! I'm gay! Oh Im so oppressed!" flamboyant types...that shit is just plain annoying & there is zero chance in hell that I will befriend him, I know all I need to know about that individual and his wearing of his "oppression" on his sleeve tells me he's a needy little faggot.

:lol: Poor Locke...doesn't realize that the fact he thinks of gay sex when he finds out someone is gay is HIS problem...not "the gheys". :lol:
 
1. Your wrong, I want no harm to come to anyone. Of course I can't speak for homophobes as I am not one

Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.

Merriam Webster: Straightphobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against normal, healthy sexual behavior or straight folks

Wrong...

straightphobia
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/straightphobia

Seems webster does not have that word in the dictionary. Nice try.:lol:
 
So satan isn't evil?

Nope, in the Hebrew Bible Satan is seen and translated as an accuser or adversary, Ha-Satan in Hebrew means The adversary. It was not until much later in the New Testament that Satan is viewed as being evil

1 Chronicles 21:1, "Satan stood up against Israel" (KJV) or "And there standeth up an adversary against Israel" (Young's Literal Translation)

Psalm 109:6b "and let Satan stand at his right hand" (KJV) or "let an accuser stand at his right hand." (ESV, etc.)

The other eight instances of satan without the definite article are traditionally translated (in Greek, Latin and English) as "an adversary," etc., and taken to be humans or obedient angels:

Numbers 22:22,32 "and the angel of the LORD stood in the way for an adversary against him."
32 "behold, I went out to withstand thee,"

1 Samuel 29:4 The Philistines say: "lest he [David] be an adversary against us"

2 Samuel 19:22 David says: "[you sons of Zeruaiah] should this day be adversaries (plural) unto me?"

1 Kings 5:4 Solomon writes to Hiram: "there is neither adversary nor evil occurrent."

1 Kings 11:14 "And the LORD stirred up an adversary unto Solomon, Hadad the Edomite"

1 Kings 11:23 "And God stirred him up an adversary, Rezon the son of Eliadah"
25 "And he [Rezon] was an adversary to Israel all the days of Solomon"

In the Book of Job, ha-Satan is a member of the Divine Council, "the sons of God" who are subservient to God. Ha-Satan, in this capacity, is many times translated as "the prosecutor", and is charged by God to tempt humans and to report back to God all who go against His decrees.

So in Judaism, which is the religion that Jesus practiced, Satan can be anyone or any nation that is opposed to the Jews or against an individual. In that context. The Roman Empire was Satan, Judas was Satan. Not surprising Christianity twisted this.
 
Last edited:
Merriam Webster: Homophobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Sorry Pop, homophobe is a shoe that fits you well. You wish to deny gay and lesbian partnerships the protections of civil marriage. That IS discrimination.

Merriam Webster: Straightphobia; : irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against normal, healthy sexual behavior or straight folks

Wrong...

straightphobia
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/straightphobia

Seems webster does not have that word in the dictionary. Nice try.:lol:

However I found this amusing parody on the Urban Dictionary!

Urban Dictionary: Heterophobia

1.

Heterophobia
Gays who are afraid of heterosexuals usually due to their own inner heterosexual feelings or leanings.

2.

Heterophobia
It is or it means male or female sharing any other sexual like, than heterosexuals who have a persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of heterosexual activities that compels one to avoid it, despite a heterosexual folk desire. Heterophobia is an unreasoning disgust or intense aversion of heterosexuals, frequently supported by erroneous, and faulty statements about heterosexuals.
1. Aversion to heterosexual people or their lifestyle or culture.
2. Is a behavior or an act based on this aversion.
3. Is a strong dislike or aversion to heterosexual people.
4. Is an irrational fear of, aversion to, antipathy towards heterosexuals.
5. Is people who endulge in bigotry or intolerance because of the heterophobia sickness.
heterophobia: heterosexuals are promoted by the media, flaunt their sexuality,

:lol:
 
It depends on the homo themself, really. If some guy is a homo & doesn't feel the need to tell me about his bedroom biz, then that gives us a chance to interact like normal human beings do & see that there is more to each other & possibly be friends. As for the "look @ me! I'm gay! Oh Im so oppressed!" flamboyant types...that shit is just plain annoying & there is zero chance in hell that I will befriend him, I know all I need to know about that individual and his wearing of his "oppression" on his sleeve tells me he's a needy little faggot.

:lol: Poor Locke...doesn't realize that the fact he thinks of gay sex when he finds out someone is gay is HIS problem...not "the gheys". :lol:

You have serious comprehension problems. What I am saying is, is that if I met someone who was a homosexual & got to know them as who they are, and they were cool, and then found out they were gay....at that point, it probably wouldn't matter to me because I got to know them as an individual, you know, who they are, not who he has sex with?

I don't like flamboyant ones, so I wouldn't hang out with them. What's the problem? Am I supposed to seek out friendships with people I already know I have nothing in common with or what?
 
I have little care either way but I don't agree with gay marriage or gay adoption.
Marriage is a cornerstone of society and, if you dilute it in any way, forget society.
As for adoption, it's unfair on the kids. They'll get hammered at school, rightly or wrongly, it's going to happen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top