What did Jesus look like?

[Esmeralda]

If you Google 'Jesus' and images, you get this:

But did he really look like this?

Watch the video:


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8nUr5Lv7-Y&playnext=1&list=PL4DE39A97D1D63E34]Face of Jesus - forensic science - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Tuatara]

I think he looked like Mr. Bean. That's what I'm going with. Or maybe Marty Feldman.

 

[Mr. H.]

Was his middle name really "Of"?

 

[Esmeralda]

I think he looked like Mr. Bean. That's what I'm going with. Or maybe Marty Feldman.

No opinion then?

 

[Esmeralda]

Was his middle name really "Of"?

Et tu, Mr. H?

 

[Bumberclyde]

All the paintings of him show him as being somewhat effeminate. So I'm thinking maybe he was gay?

 

[IlarMeilyr]

His middle name is often thought to begin with the letter "H."

Others insist that His middle name is actually "Fucking."

I have serious doubts.

 

[Katzndogz]

The writers of the Bible took especial care to not give a physical description of Jesus.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

The writers of the Bible took especial care to not give a physical description of Jesus.

They did?

And you know that it was a matter of taking "especial care" as opposed to being the result mere happenstance -- how?

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Not yet disproved. So maybe this is a fair representation of what He looked like?

 

[Sallow]

Was his middle name really "Of"?

It was "H".

The "H" was silent.

Mr. H.

 

[Smilebong]

He probably looked like this without the beanie.

He did NOT look like this.

But we will never know.

I know this, he was not white and he was not whimpy. He worked at physical labor until about 30 years old, and he was a typical Jewish guy.

 

[Bumberclyde]

Not yet disproved. So maybe this is a fair representation of what He looked like?

This load of crap dates from the 12th century or thereabouts.

 

[Bumberclyde]

He probably looked like this without the beanie.

He did NOT look like this.

But we will never know.

I know this, he was not white and he was not whimpy. He worked at physical labor until about 30 years old, and he was a typical Jewish guy.

In other words, a wimp with coke bottle glasses.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Not yet disproved. So maybe this is a fair representation of what He looked like?

This load of crap dates from the 12th century or thereabouts.

Not exactly. Although SOME scientifically rigorous testing supports your claim, OTHER testing casts it into doubt:

New research suggests Shroud of Turin dates to Jesus' era | Fox News

 

[Bumberclyde]

Not yet disproved. So maybe this is a fair representation of what He looked like?

This load of crap dates from the 12th century or thereabouts.

Not exactly. Although SOME scientifically rigorous testing supports your claim, OTHER testing casts it into doubt:

New research suggests Shroud of Turin dates to Jesus' era | Fox News

Fox news. Figures.

 

[Smilebong]

He probably looked like this without the beanie.

He did NOT look like this.

But we will never know.

I know this, he was not white and he was not whimpy. He worked at physical labor until about 30 years old, and he was a typical Jewish guy.

In other words, a wimp with coke bottle glasses.

Did you read what I said?

 

[IlarMeilyr]

This load of crap dates from the 12th century or thereabouts.

Not exactly. Although SOME scientifically rigorous testing supports your claim, OTHER testing casts it into doubt:

New research suggests Shroud of Turin dates to Jesus' era | Fox News

Fox news. Figures.

Figures that a guy with your pathetic and defective intellectual prowess would confuse the fact that Fox News only REPORTED the story with the underlying facts BEING reported by Fox News.

Here: try to smarten up for once.

Tests conducted on the Shroud of Turin by researchers at Italy's University of Padua indicate that the linen sheet believed by some to be Christ's burial cloth dates back to Jesus' lifetime.

New research suggests Shroud of Turin dates to Jesus' era | Fox News

Plus, you could go to: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...8/Turin-Shroud-is-not-a-medieval-forgery.html

 

[Tuatara]

I think he looked like Mr. Bean. That's what I'm going with. Or maybe Marty Feldman.

No opinion then?

I just don't believe he existed. The bible is so full of BS.

 

[Bumberclyde]

Not exactly. Although SOME scientifically rigorous testing supports your claim, OTHER testing casts it into doubt:

New research suggests Shroud of Turin dates to Jesus' era | Fox News

Fox news. Figures.

Figures that a guy with your pathetic and defective intellectual prowess would confuse the fact that Fox News only REPORTED the story with the underlying facts BEING reported by Fox News.

Here: try to smarten up for once.

Tests conducted on the Shroud of Turin by researchers at Italy's University of Padua indicate that the linen sheet believed by some to be Christ's burial cloth dates back to Jesus' lifetime.

New research suggests Shroud of Turin dates to Jesus' era | Fox News

Plus, you could go to: Turin Shroud 'is not a medieval forgery' - Telegraph

From your link: "The tests dated the age of the shroud to between 300 BC and 400AD."

I think that that's called either a guesstimate or a scientist who didn't graduate at the top of his class. Which is it?