Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dumb ass, SSDD, you have been repeatedly provided with the absorption spectra of the GHGs. Nothing more is needed. At least, not for anyone with the least amount of scientific knowledge. Your ignorance in that department is evident to all, oh you of the intelligent photons.
Goodness sakes, here is ol' Preddy stating two sentences and thinking that he has prove the work of decades of thousands of scientists wrong. Mostly has proven himself to be another clueless idiot.
Just as the scientists predicted, every decade, we get more and more record years for temperature.
No, I simply accept the evidence and observations done by scientists with decades of experiance and study of the subject over the flap yap of an internet ignoramus.Goodness sakes, here is ol' Preddy stating two sentences and thinking that he has prove the work of decades of thousands of scientists wrong. Mostly has proven himself to be another clueless idiot.
Just as the scientists predicted, every decade, we get more and more record years for temperature.
Goodness sakes here's Old Rocks thinking that all he has to do is speak whatever nonsense he's thinking and it's correct.
It's easy to predict the warming but that doesn't prove its caused by man.
You AGW scam artists always try to steer the argument away from the issue that matters.
Now who to believe? An ignoramus that believes in smart photons, or generations of trained physicists? LOL
No, I simply accept the evidence and observations done by scientists with decades of experiance and study of the subject over the flap yap of an internet ignoramus.Goodness sakes, here is ol' Preddy stating two sentences and thinking that he has prove the work of decades of thousands of scientists wrong. Mostly has proven himself to be another clueless idiot.
Just as the scientists predicted, every decade, we get more and more record years for temperature.
Goodness sakes here's Old Rocks thinking that all he has to do is speak whatever nonsense he's thinking and it's correct.
It's easy to predict the warming but that doesn't prove its caused by man.
You AGW scam artists always try to steer the argument away from the issue that matters.
No, I simply accept the evidence and observations done by scientists with decades of experiance and study of the subject over the flap yap of an internet ignoramus.
Of course you accept it, it's much easier than thinking. Well if you knew anything at all, you would know that there is no evidence to support the only claim that matters.
Now who to believe? An ignoramus that believes in smart photons, or generations of trained physicists? LOL
Good one rocks...a twofer...first a lie about smart photons followed up by another appeal to authority. If all those physicists you claim were right....where is the tropospheric hot spot they predicted? You act like just because a supposed expert says a thing...or a hundred experts...or ten thousand have said a thing that it must be true....if you asked every gastroenterologist on earth a couple of years ago, they would have all told you that stomach ulcers were caused by stress...if you asked heart specialists a year ago if colesterol were proven to cause heart disease, they would have said yes.....and one could go through a litany of examples where all the experts were wrong...in fact, in nearly every instance...where a relatively new science is concerned, the experts are almost always wrong. Climate science is relatively new and it is a pretty sure bet that the experts are wrong...and will continue to be wrong till we know a hell of a lot more about what factors drive the climate than we do right now.
Now who to believe? An ignoramus that believes in smart photons, or generations of trained physicists? LOL
Good one rocks...a twofer...first a lie about smart photons followed up by another appeal to authority. If all those physicists you claim were right....where is the tropospheric hot spot they predicted? You act like just because a supposed expert says a thing...or a hundred experts...or ten thousand have said a thing that it must be true....if you asked every gastroenterologist on earth a couple of years ago, they would have all told you that stomach ulcers were caused by stress...if you asked heart specialists a year ago if colesterol were proven to cause heart disease, they would have said yes.....and one could go through a litany of examples where all the experts were wrong...in fact, in nearly every instance...where a relatively new science is concerned, the experts are almost always wrong. Climate science is relatively new and it is a pretty sure bet that the experts are wrong...and will continue to be wrong till we know a hell of a lot more about what factors drive the climate than we do right now.
The reason so many people are duped these days is that they would rather appeal to authority than think. My two favorite subjects in my entire schooling was History and Science. If you know history and science you'll never believe in man made climate change as it is being pushed now.
Now who to believe? An ignoramus that believes in smart photons, or generations of trained physicists? LOL
No, I simply accept the evidence and observations done by scientists with decades of experiance and study of the subject over the flap yap of an internet ignoramus.
But you disregard the overwhelming evidence from all fields of science that early on in any field, the experts are almost universally wrong...now you have a young science that has been hijacked by politics...really rocks...what are the odds that the experts are right on this one?
This is hardly early on in the study of GHGs in the atmosphere. In 1859 Tyndall did the first experiments that gave us the absorption spectra of the GHGs. By 1896, Arrhenius quantified the results, and made pretty a pretty accurate estimation of what the doubling of CO2 would do.
We have a pretty good idea of how the GHGs work, and have been creating ever more accurate models for predicting the future. That you choose, for political reasons, to reject the science, does in no way, change the validity of that science. All it does is demonstrate willful ignorance on your part.
Now who to believe? An ignoramus that believes in smart photons, or generations of trained physicists? LOL
Good one rocks...a twofer...first a lie about smart photons followed up by another appeal to authority. If all those physicists you claim were right....where is the tropospheric hot spot they predicted? You act like just because a supposed expert says a thing...or a hundred experts...or ten thousand have said a thing that it must be true....if you asked every gastroenterologist on earth a couple of years ago, they would have all told you that stomach ulcers were caused by stress...if you asked heart specialists a year ago if colesterol were proven to cause heart disease, they would have said yes.....and one could go through a litany of examples where all the experts were wrong...in fact, in nearly every instance...where a relatively new science is concerned, the experts are almost always wrong. Climate science is relatively new and it is a pretty sure bet that the experts are wrong...and will continue to be wrong till we know a hell of a lot more about what factors drive the climate than we do right now.
The reason so many people are duped these days is that they would rather appeal to authority than think. My two favorite subjects in my entire schooling was History and Science. If you know history and science you'll never believe in man made climate change as it is being pushed now.
Belief has always been easier than knowing....if you know a thing, it can easily run contrary to what you want to believe...if you just believe no problem.
Well, without writing a book, virtually all the scientists in the world state that AGW is real, so why should I given any weight to the opinion of someone that has repeatedly shown themselves to be an ignoramus?Well, without writing a book, virtually all the scientists in the world state that AGW is real, so why should I given any weight to the opinion of someone that has repeatedly shown themselves to be an ignoramus?
Just as the scientists predicted, every decade, we get more and more record years for temperatureGoodness sakes, here is ol' Preddy stating two sentences and thinking that he has prove the work of decades of thousands of scientists wrong. Mostly has proven himself to be another clueless idiot.
Just as the scientists predicted, every decade, we get more and more record years for temperature.
