What evidence is there that Steve Bannon is a racist?

[hadit]

The best evidence that Bannon is a racist is how much support he gets from the racists around here.

Like who?

lol, like Steve_McGarrett and any of you who vocally or tacitly support him.

while they'll never admit to it better than 50% of republicans are racist scum

Care to prove that, or admit you're full of it?

 

[hadit]

I laid out specific actions that would indicate that a person is a racist. Thus far, not only have I seen none of those actions demonstrated, I see you continue to demand standards of proof while ignoring what I posted.

You seem to not understand what the word PROOF means. The OP asked for PROOF not "actions that would indicate". Try again.

When you find out you cant then you'll realize how stupid it is to ask for proof of racism

So, are you contending that is OK to label someone a racist with zero evidence to support said assertion?

I'm saying that asking for proof when you cant identify ONE piece of proof of someone being racist means you want someone else to do what you are incapable of.

Here, I'll make it easier for you. Is there any instance you can think of when someone has MOST DEFINITELY been racist in the last 20 years? Anything?

I provided you 3. You still cant handle it.

Interesting now that you want to try and hide behind the word proof while, yet again, misconstruing what the word actually means.

Hell, according to your logic there is no proof for AGW. Nice work. Thus far you have provided nothing at all once again showing that you have declared one racist simply because you deem it so.

Hell, dude...You quoted yourself claiming you answered my question without answering anything...Heres the chain

Me:What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.
You: I laid out specific actions that would indicate that a person is a racist. Thus far, not only have I seen none of those actions demonstrated, I see you continue to demand standards of proof while ignoring what I posted.


Where did you lay anything out to me? The only thing you've done is say over and over you answered but according to the quotes you didnt.

You're getting posters mixed up. Slow down, it really helps.

 

[jillian]

I hear on most media that Steve Bannon is a white racist but never hear where the get that view. Is there actually something in his background that makes him one or is it just another democrat ploy to attempt to weaken President Trump's administration?

his so-called "news site.... and everything that comes out of his mouth.

what a stupid qustion

 

[jillian]

The best evidence that Bannon is a racist is how much support he gets from the racists around here.

Like who?

lol, like Steve_McGarrett and any of you who vocally or tacitly support him.

while they'll never admit to it better than 50% of republicans are racist scum

Care to prove that, or admit you're full of it?

res ipsa loquitur

 

[edward37]

The best evidence that Bannon is a racist is how much support he gets from the racists around here.

Like who?

lol, like Steve_McGarrett and any of you who vocally or tacitly support him.

while they'll never admit to it better than 50% of republicans are racist scum

Care to prove that, or admit you're full of it?

proof ?, how many votes did you get from the racist south,, all those dumbass rednecks who follow in the footsteps of their racist daddies and grand daddies??

 

[hadit]

The best evidence that Bannon is a racist is how much support he gets from the racists around here.

Like who?

lol, like Steve_McGarrett and any of you who vocally or tacitly support him.

while they'll never admit to it better than 50% of republicans are racist scum

Care to prove that, or admit you're full of it?

proof ?, how many votes did you get from the racist south,, all those dumbass rednecks who follow in the footsteps of their racist daddies and grand daddies??

You mean the same south that was around when Obama ran and won, the same south that was around when every other president in the modern era ran?

BTW, I wasn't running for president, so I didn't get any votes.

Try again.

 

[jc456]

Here's a piece from a former employee that pretty much vouches that he is most definitely NOT a racist.

3 Thoughts On Steve Bannon As White House 'Chief Strategist'
3 Thoughts On Steve Bannon As White House 'Chief Strategist'

Ex-Brietbart Staffer: Trump’s New Campaign CEO’s Meetings Sounded Like ‘White Supremacist’ Rallies
August 19, 2016Ed Hanratty Wonkery

• 
  

CEO Stephen Bannon And Donald Trump Are A Match Made In Heaven
It’s only fitting that a man who spent his life ruining casinos is chasing his losses by doubling down. Donald Trump’s latest last-ditch effort to revive his failing campaign has led the GOP Nominee to appoint former Breitbart chief Stephen Bannon as the CEO of his presidential campaign, and according to a former Breitbart staffer, Trump is basically hiring Trump. Kurt Bardella, who worked at Breitbart with Bannon for two years, told ABC News that his ex-boss would routinely make racist and xenophobic remarks during routine professional calls.

 

[jc456]

The best evidence that Bannon is a racist is how much support he gets from the racists around here.

Like who?

lol, like Steve_McGarrett and any of you who vocally or tacitly support him.

while they'll never admit to it better than 50% of republicans are racist scum

Care to prove that, or admit you're full of it?

proof ?, how many votes did you get from the racist south,, all those dumbass rednecks who follow in the footsteps of their racist daddies and grand daddies??

so hitlery didn't get any votes out of the south? hmmm really?

 

[FA_Q2]

I laid out specific actions that would indicate that a person is a racist. Thus far, not only have I seen none of those actions demonstrated, I see you continue to demand standards of proof while ignoring what I posted.

You seem to not understand what the word PROOF means. The OP asked for PROOF not "actions that would indicate". Try again.

When you find out you cant then you'll realize how stupid it is to ask for proof of racism

So, are you contending that is OK to label someone a racist with zero evidence to support said assertion?

I'm saying that asking for proof when you cant identify ONE piece of proof of someone being racist means you want someone else to do what you are incapable of.

Here, I'll make it easier for you. Is there any instance you can think of when someone has MOST DEFINITELY been racist in the last 20 years? Anything?

I provided you 3. You still cant handle it.

Interesting now that you want to try and hide behind the word proof while, yet again, misconstruing what the word actually means.

Hell, according to your logic there is no proof for AGW. Nice work. Thus far you have provided nothing at all once again showing that you have declared one racist simply because you deem it so.

Hell, dude...You quoted yourself claiming you answered my question without answering anything...Heres the chain

Me:What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.
You: I laid out specific actions that would indicate that a person is a racist. Thus far, not only have I seen none of those actions demonstrated, I see you continue to demand standards of proof while ignoring what I posted.


Where did you lay anything out to me? The only thing you've done is say over and over you answered but according to the quotes you didnt.

Post 284.

Its funny you keep asking for proof of something that you cant provide any examples of proof. How about you ask for something you can explain instead of this "whos on first" routine you got going?

So what you are trying to say is that you believe Bannon is racist absent any proof. He simply is because you deemed it so.

Step right up!

What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.

Something that shows they view one race as inferior or superior to others. Hatred based on race or the idea that one race need to be eliminated.

Proving someone is racist is rather simple. Here are some easy examples:



Blatant hate and violence.

Or something less overt that tries to paint a positive spin on hatred:


Clearly made by a racist.

And another:

 

[edward37]

Like who?

lol, like Steve_McGarrett and any of you who vocally or tacitly support him.

while they'll never admit to it better than 50% of republicans are racist scum

Care to prove that, or admit you're full of it?

proof ?, how many votes did you get from the racist south,, all those dumbass rednecks who follow in the footsteps of their racist daddies and grand daddies??

so hitlery didn't get any votes out of the south? hmmm really?

how many for electoral college??,,,,sure blacks voted for her ,,,racists not so much

 

[Uncensored2008]

The best evidence that Bannon is a racist is how much support he gets from the racists around here.

I hadn't seen you give him any support?

I think you've had enough crack for the day.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I hear on most media that Steve Bannon is a white racist but never hear where the get that view. Is there actually something in his background that makes him one or is it just another democrat ploy to attempt to weaken President Trump's administration?

his so-called "news site.... and everything that comes out of his mouth.

what a stupid qustion

DERP

Even considering that this comes from you, this is insanely stupid.

He is an enemy of the party,, so you fling shit. You have no evidence, you need no evidence. The hate sites told you to slander him, so you slander him. It's not like you have a shred of integrity nor the ability to reason.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Its funny you keep asking for proof of something that you cant provide any examples of proof. How about you ask for something you can explain instead of this "whos on first" routine you got going?

So what you are trying to say is that you believe Bannon is racist absent any proof. He simply is because you deemed it so.

Step right up!

What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.

Something that shows they view one race as inferior or superior to others. Hatred based on race or the idea that one race need to be eliminated.

Proving someone is racist is rather simple. Here are some easy examples:



Blatant hate and violence.

Or something less overt that tries to paint a positive spin on hatred:


Clearly made by a racist.

And another:

And sometimes it can be extremely difficult. The far right has, for example, learned to use words to hide the fact that they mean something else. So the BNP in the UK for example talked about "British" but they meant "white British".

It is very easy to accuse someone of being something when all you have to do is take whatever they say and insist that they mean something completely different.

"I will not rest until all American children from every background of every skin color is included in the American dream".

"RACIST!! You mean only white children when you say all children"

"All people are entitled to a legal defense in court".

"RACIST!! You mean only white people when you say all people".

That's how it works when you think you're a mind reader in addition to a crime fighter, at least when you put on the tights and the mask.

Yes, it is difficult to interpret what someone says.

The first thing is that politicians should be careful with the words they use. There are those who hate political correctness, but the reality is saying what you want to say is more intelligent than anything else.

People will try and interpret what a politician says to make it more negative. Smart politicians speak in a way that doesn't allow for this, it's part of the game. But at the same time those who are on the far right, racists and the like are playing the same game, they're hiding their racism from some, and showing it to others. How do you know? It's hard to know, sometimes you can see it happening, you see the inconsistencies in what is being said, etc.

I don't accuse people of being racist lightly, I'll do it when I think there's enough evidence available.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Its funny you keep asking for proof of something that you cant provide any examples of proof. How about you ask for something you can explain instead of this "whos on first" routine you got going?

So what you are trying to say is that you believe Bannon is racist absent any proof. He simply is because you deemed it so.

Step right up!

What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.

Something that shows they view one race as inferior or superior to others. Hatred based on race or the idea that one race need to be eliminated.

Proving someone is racist is rather simple. Here are some easy examples:



Blatant hate and violence.

Or something less overt that tries to paint a positive spin on hatred:


Clearly made by a racist.

And another:

And sometimes it can be extremely difficult. The far right has, for example, learned to use words to hide the fact that they mean something else. So the BNP in the UK for example talked about "British" but they meant "white British".

Sometimes it can.

I do not see how that absolves one of the onus of proof when they go around screaming someone is a racist. It also does not mean that you should level that term carte-blanch at anyone that you disagree with. Here, in this thread, I have already been given an excuse that proving such is impossible so we should just accept that he is, indicators of racism are holding political positions that one poster is against and now you with an excuse that it is 'difficult.'

Yet no real case has been presented. That is not a case of difficult - it is a case of believing something because you want it to be true and refusing to see the obvious.

I agree, I haven't been calling this guy a racist. But then just as lots of people on here spend their time on here insulting every time something gets difficult. Funny how some of those same people are ones who are objecting to the other side doing it. Such is the life in partisan politics.

 

[hadit]

So what you are trying to say is that you believe Bannon is racist absent any proof. He simply is because you deemed it so.

Step right up!

What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.

Something that shows they view one race as inferior or superior to others. Hatred based on race or the idea that one race need to be eliminated.

Proving someone is racist is rather simple. Here are some easy examples:



Blatant hate and violence.

Or something less overt that tries to paint a positive spin on hatred:


Clearly made by a racist.

And another:

And sometimes it can be extremely difficult. The far right has, for example, learned to use words to hide the fact that they mean something else. So the BNP in the UK for example talked about "British" but they meant "white British".

It is very easy to accuse someone of being something when all you have to do is take whatever they say and insist that they mean something completely different.

"I will not rest until all American children from every background of every skin color is included in the American dream".

"RACIST!! You mean only white children when you say all children"

"All people are entitled to a legal defense in court".

"RACIST!! You mean only white people when you say all people".

That's how it works when you think you're a mind reader in addition to a crime fighter, at least when you put on the tights and the mask.

Yes, it is difficult to interpret what someone says.

The first thing is that politicians should be careful with the words they use. There are those who hate political correctness, but the reality is saying what you want to say is more intelligent than anything else.

People will try and interpret what a politician says to make it more negative. Smart politicians speak in a way that doesn't allow for this, it's part of the game. But at the same time those who are on the far right, racists and the like are playing the same game, they're hiding their racism from some, and showing it to others. How do you know? It's hard to know, sometimes you can see it happening, you see the inconsistencies in what is being said, etc.

I don't accuse people of being racist lightly, I'll do it when I think there's enough evidence available.

Most politicians say nothing that hasn't been carefully focus group tested to avoid saying anything of substance at all. Trump is not most politicians, thus will say a lot of things that people will hate.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Step right up!

What is proof that someone is racist? Your turn.

Something that shows they view one race as inferior or superior to others. Hatred based on race or the idea that one race need to be eliminated.

Proving someone is racist is rather simple. Here are some easy examples:



Blatant hate and violence.

Or something less overt that tries to paint a positive spin on hatred:


Clearly made by a racist.

And another:

And sometimes it can be extremely difficult. The far right has, for example, learned to use words to hide the fact that they mean something else. So the BNP in the UK for example talked about "British" but they meant "white British".

It is very easy to accuse someone of being something when all you have to do is take whatever they say and insist that they mean something completely different.

"I will not rest until all American children from every background of every skin color is included in the American dream".

"RACIST!! You mean only white children when you say all children"

"All people are entitled to a legal defense in court".

"RACIST!! You mean only white people when you say all people".

That's how it works when you think you're a mind reader in addition to a crime fighter, at least when you put on the tights and the mask.

Yes, it is difficult to interpret what someone says.

The first thing is that politicians should be careful with the words they use. There are those who hate political correctness, but the reality is saying what you want to say is more intelligent than anything else.

People will try and interpret what a politician says to make it more negative. Smart politicians speak in a way that doesn't allow for this, it's part of the game. But at the same time those who are on the far right, racists and the like are playing the same game, they're hiding their racism from some, and showing it to others. How do you know? It's hard to know, sometimes you can see it happening, you see the inconsistencies in what is being said, etc.

I don't accuse people of being racist lightly, I'll do it when I think there's enough evidence available.

Most politicians say nothing that hasn't been carefully focus group tested to avoid saying anything of substance at all. Trump is not most politicians, thus will say a lot of things that people will hate.

Yes, of course, there are two parties and politicians have to appeal to half the country. Trump says a lot of things that people hate, and somehow he's got away with it, but most wouldn't. Probably because he's said what he's said and play the boo hoo victim card at the same time.

 

[hadit]

Something that shows they view one race as inferior or superior to others. Hatred based on race or the idea that one race need to be eliminated.

Proving someone is racist is rather simple. Here are some easy examples:



Blatant hate and violence.

Or something less overt that tries to paint a positive spin on hatred:


Clearly made by a racist.

And another:

And sometimes it can be extremely difficult. The far right has, for example, learned to use words to hide the fact that they mean something else. So the BNP in the UK for example talked about "British" but they meant "white British".

It is very easy to accuse someone of being something when all you have to do is take whatever they say and insist that they mean something completely different.

"I will not rest until all American children from every background of every skin color is included in the American dream".

"RACIST!! You mean only white children when you say all children"

"All people are entitled to a legal defense in court".

"RACIST!! You mean only white people when you say all people".

That's how it works when you think you're a mind reader in addition to a crime fighter, at least when you put on the tights and the mask.

Yes, it is difficult to interpret what someone says.

The first thing is that politicians should be careful with the words they use. There are those who hate political correctness, but the reality is saying what you want to say is more intelligent than anything else.

People will try and interpret what a politician says to make it more negative. Smart politicians speak in a way that doesn't allow for this, it's part of the game. But at the same time those who are on the far right, racists and the like are playing the same game, they're hiding their racism from some, and showing it to others. How do you know? It's hard to know, sometimes you can see it happening, you see the inconsistencies in what is being said, etc.

I don't accuse people of being racist lightly, I'll do it when I think there's enough evidence available.

Most politicians say nothing that hasn't been carefully focus group tested to avoid saying anything of substance at all. Trump is not most politicians, thus will say a lot of things that people will hate.

Yes, of course, there are two parties and politicians have to appeal to half the country. Trump says a lot of things that people hate, and somehow he's got away with it, but most wouldn't. Probably because he's said what he's said and play the boo hoo victim card at the same time.

He won and "gets away with it" precisely because he is not scripted and focus group tested. People have gotten tired of politicians saying nothing.

 

[frigidweirdo]

And sometimes it can be extremely difficult. The far right has, for example, learned to use words to hide the fact that they mean something else. So the BNP in the UK for example talked about "British" but they meant "white British".

It is very easy to accuse someone of being something when all you have to do is take whatever they say and insist that they mean something completely different.

"I will not rest until all American children from every background of every skin color is included in the American dream".

"RACIST!! You mean only white children when you say all children"

"All people are entitled to a legal defense in court".

"RACIST!! You mean only white people when you say all people".

That's how it works when you think you're a mind reader in addition to a crime fighter, at least when you put on the tights and the mask.

Yes, it is difficult to interpret what someone says.

The first thing is that politicians should be careful with the words they use. There are those who hate political correctness, but the reality is saying what you want to say is more intelligent than anything else.

People will try and interpret what a politician says to make it more negative. Smart politicians speak in a way that doesn't allow for this, it's part of the game. But at the same time those who are on the far right, racists and the like are playing the same game, they're hiding their racism from some, and showing it to others. How do you know? It's hard to know, sometimes you can see it happening, you see the inconsistencies in what is being said, etc.

I don't accuse people of being racist lightly, I'll do it when I think there's enough evidence available.

Most politicians say nothing that hasn't been carefully focus group tested to avoid saying anything of substance at all. Trump is not most politicians, thus will say a lot of things that people will hate.

Yes, of course, there are two parties and politicians have to appeal to half the country. Trump says a lot of things that people hate, and somehow he's got away with it, but most wouldn't. Probably because he's said what he's said and play the boo hoo victim card at the same time.

He won and "gets away with it" precisely because he is not scripted and focus group tested. People have gotten tired of politicians saying nothing.

Have they? They keep voting for such politicians. People should think about the system of govt they want so that they can actually CHOOSE who they want, rather than this current farce of a system.

 

[Reasonable]

To answer the thread question for one Bannon wouldn't let his kids attend schools that Jews attended.... that little thing.

Adding homophobe and misogynist to his manywonderful qualities, lets check out some headline stories Bannon was responsible for after Breitbart died. Breitbart wasn't a racist and I'm sure he turned over in his grave on multiple times with these Bannon headlines:


'Gay rights have made us dumber, it's time to get back in the closet'

A June 2015 article by Yiannopoulos, who is openly gay, argued in favor of "forcing gays back into the closet." "I find it depressing that my fellow fags have stopped breeding," Yiannopoulos wrote.

' "Would you rather your child had feminism or cancer?" '

A February post on the website included a video created by the Michigan Review, a University of Michigan publication, to promote a debate on campus featuring Yiannopoulos. The publication asked participants the question.


"There's no hiring bias against women in tech, they just suck at interviews"

A July article suggested that research revealed "women might just suck at job interviews."


'Hoist it high and proud: The Confederate flag proclaims a glorious heritage'

An article published in July 2015, weeks after a mass shooting at a historic black church in Charleston, South Carolina, slammed critics of the Confederate flag, a symbol embraced by the gunman. "Those who initiated identity politics are attempting to obliterate the Southern identity," the author of the Breitbart piece wrote. "Every tree, every rooftop, every picket fence, every telegraph pole in the South should be festooned with the Confederate battle flag."

'Suck it up buttercups: Dangerous Faggot Tour returns to colleges in September'

An article in July touted tour dates for a show headlined by Breitbart tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos, a prolific Breitbart writer who was banned from Twitter this summer for violating rules against abuse.

To think trump liked this type of prejudice, racism and hate so much that he made this guy his chief adviser.

 

[Correll]

rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun

1. prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
   "a program to combat racism"
   synonyms: racial discrimination, racialism, racial prejudice, xenophobia, chauvinism, bigotry, casteism
   "Aborigines are the main victims of racism in Australia"
   • the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

Lmao...got him!

How so?

Because you can't anewer my quesrion...which shows that OP is asking for evidence that cannot be explained.

You are claiming that posting the dictionary definition of the word, does not explain what needs to be shown to support the vile lie that Bannon is racist.


You are the problem.

Show that he has "prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."



Obviously.

You get so firey when you cant answer a question little buddy. You almost make people forget that you cant answer the question with all your arm waving.

The explanation is to show that Bannon fits the dictionary definition of the word.


If you can't do that, and you libs have shown that you can't. then you shouldn't accuse him of being that.


You libs are the ones that can't "answer the question" or support your vile smears.