What Gives You People The Right To Ban People From Social Media Simply Over Differing Opinions?

[protectionist]

Being the owner of the platform gives the owners the right to police their site.

"You people" have no power to decide what a particular site will allow.

FALSE! What a particular site may allow is governed by THE LAW. If the owner of the platform allows ILLEGAL speech, they could be sued, and possibly arrested.

 

[Brick Gold]

View attachment 596119

Democrats are busying roaming around social-media trying to get anyone who they have a differing opinion with removed from the platform.
That's really what it amounts to.
They think that because they have the power to do it....nobody can stop them.

They dress up their censorship with a statement that the guilty party was spreading misinformation which goes against their made up rules.
Breaking the rules results in a ban.....but all the guilty party did was express a different opinion, and anyone who knows the left, having a different opinion is unforgivable.
So after years of warning....we can see the establishment using word-police to stifle freedom of speech.
Is this China.....or is it America?



Nobody is going to be allowed to have millions of followers, voice different opinions, and not end up being attacked by the left.
In a nutshell: The left is using the COVID pandemic to act as word-police against their opposition.
Whether the pandemic is real doesn't matter. What the left is doing with it is what is wrong and should be thoroughly condemned.
But not only is the Biden Adm encouraging this to continue....but they're working with social-media to make is worse.

Links

The problem with social media censorship | The Bradford

whsbradford.org

The Truth About Social Media Censorship - The List

Social media censorship is a tricky subject. While people have a right to free expression, there are still limits to what one can say on a public platform.

www.thelist.com

Social Media Censorship and the Law- FindLaw

FindLaw's article on Social Media Censorship and the Law. For more information on this and related topics, see FindLaw's section on Enforcing Your Civil Rights.

www.findlaw.com

The right of way on social media is no different than owning an establishment. You can force people to leave and you dont need a reason, all you need is to own and run the place. Freedom of speech is a public right, intended to address public matters. Why do you think Ive been told to go a million times? Because I dont frequent public owned places where I am free to be expressive and intelligent.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The owner of the property, can do anything they want with it.

Except to refuse to bake a cake

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Overview

On January 8, 2021, President Donald J. Trump Tweeted:

“The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”

Shortly thereafter, the President Tweeted:

“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, and an uptick in the global conversation in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, these two Tweets must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the President’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well as in the context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks. After assessing the language in these Tweets against our Glorification of Violence policy, we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service.

Assessment

We assessed the two Tweets referenced above under our Glorification of Violence policy, which aims to prevent the glorification of violence that could inspire others to replicate violent acts and determined that they were highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This determination is based on a number of factors, including:

• President Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the Inauguration is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and is seen as him disavowing his previous claim made via two Tweets (1, 2) by his Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, that there would be an “orderly transition” on January 20th.
• The second Tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a “safe” target, as he will not be attending.
• The use of the words “American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the US Capitol.
• The mention of his supporters having a “GIANT VOICE long into the future” and that “They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an “orderly transition” and instead that he plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election.
• Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021.

As such, our determination is that the two Tweets above are likely to inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021, and that there are multiple indicators that they are being received and understood as encouragement to do so.

Haahaahahahahahahaaha

 

[kaz]

Overview

On January 8, 2021, President Donald J. Trump Tweeted:

“The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”

Shortly thereafter, the President Tweeted:

“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, and an uptick in the global conversation in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, these two Tweets must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the President’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well as in the context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks. After assessing the language in these Tweets against our Glorification of Violence policy, we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service.

Assessment

We assessed the two Tweets referenced above under our Glorification of Violence policy, which aims to prevent the glorification of violence that could inspire others to replicate violent acts and determined that they were highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This determination is based on a number of factors, including:

• President Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the Inauguration is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and is seen as him disavowing his previous claim made via two Tweets (1, 2) by his Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, that there would be an “orderly transition” on January 20th.
• The second Tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a “safe” target, as he will not be attending.
• The use of the words “American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the US Capitol.
• The mention of his supporters having a “GIANT VOICE long into the future” and that “They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an “orderly transition” and instead that he plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election.
• Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021.

As such, our determination is that the two Tweets above are likely to inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021, and that there are multiple indicators that they are being received and understood as encouragement to do so.

This is why I have your dickless ass on ignore. Actually three reasons. This time you did all three. Nice job. That last sentence was sarcasm since you're so incredibly stupid. Here you go.

1) You spam the shit out of me with contentless posts
2) You're in love with me. I haven't looked at posts literally for several months and the first time I do you prove you can't get over me.
3) And let's examine a sample of this post, you stupid piece of shit

kaz: So dickless wonder, show the quote Trump called for violence. If he had done that, it would be all over the internet.

Shade sample answer: “To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

He's not going to the innauguratoin, that's your answer to my question you stupid, dickless piece of shit.

Learn to be a man. What a load. That's your answer to provide the quotes he called for violence. It's the stupid shit you constantly post and why you are a long term ignore list member.

So if I don't see you again for a while, be sure to fuck yourself every day for me. Fuck yourself, bitch.

 

[Slade3200]

This is why I have your dickless ass on ignore. Actually three reasons. This time you did all three. Nice job. That last sentence was sarcasm since you're so incredibly stupid. Here you go.

1) You spam the shit out of me with contentless posts
2) You're in love with me. I haven't looked at posts literally for several months and the first time I do you prove you can't get over me.
3) And let's examine a sample of this post, you stupid piece of shit

kaz: So dickless wonder, show the quote Trump called for violence. If he had done that, it would be all over the internet.

Shade sample answer: “To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

He's not going to the innauguratoin, that's your answer to my question you stupid, dickless piece of shit.

Learn to be a man. What a load. That's your answer to provide the quotes he called for violence. It's the stupid shit you constantly post and why you are a long term ignore list member.

So if I don't see you again for a while, be sure to fuck yourself every day for me. Fuck yourself, bitch.

Wow, that was quite the rant. You asked for the tweets that got him banned. I literally posted twitters explaination of the situation. I didn’t even provide commentary. And look at the emotion and personal attacks it provoked from you. It sounds like you have some issues to sort out. I simply answered your question.

 

[mudwhistle]

The right of way on social media is no different than owning an establishment. You can force people to leave and you dont need a reason, all you need is to own and run the place. Freedom of speech is a public right, intended to address public matters. Why do you think Ive been told to go a million times? Because I dont frequent public owned places where I am free to be expressive and intelligent.

The problem seems to be that these companies are throwing their weight around because they hold a monopoly on social-media. They're breaking anti-trust laws by undermining and preventing competition.