What is an "assault rifle"?

[rightwinger]

This meets the Left's definition of an assault rifle. No more Olympic Biathlon.

View attachment 274648

I don’t think a bolt action rifle qualifies as an assault rifle

We are thinking more AK 47

you said - any gun that can fire more than a round a second you'd call an assault rifle.

You Can Shoot a Bolt-Action Almost as Fast as a Semi-Auto

now then yes, you're desire to snark on and get "cute" encompasses even bolt action rifles and again, makes you look the fool for chasing something you obviously don't understand as if that gives you some right to dictate control over it.

go study up and stop looking so stupid with every passing statement.

Ok...if you insist, we can ban those too

You got one shot per second. If gun owners start suffering huge casualties because they can’t fire faster than a shot per second, we can reassess the requirement

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

 

[Hale]

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

Now let's hear how you propose to manufacture such a gun.

Bottom line: You're just another Communist gun-grabber with zero knowledge of firearms.

 

[rightwinger]

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

Now let's hear how you propose to manufacture such a gun.

Bottom line: You're just another Communist gun-grabber with zero knowledge of firearms.

Gun manufacturers are smart motherfuckers

They can figure out trigger pressures and bullet loading into a chamber

 

[Hale]

rightwinger - Yea, you can tag it "funny", but you can't explain how you would implement a "one round per second" mechanism.

What's really funny is the inherent dishonesty of the "gun control" nuts. If they had the slightest bit of sincerity they'd educate themselves about firearms and propose real-world solutions based on knowledge.

The fact is, every cartridge based firearm in existence can be fired faster than one round per second. Yes, this even includes single-shot guns.

 

[rightwinger]

rightwinger - Yea, you can tag it "funny", but you can't explain how you would implement a "one round per second" mechanism.

What's really funny is the inherent dishonesty of the "gun control" nuts. If they had the slightest bit of sincerity they'd educate themselves about firearms and propose real-world solutions based on knowledge.

The fact is, every cartridge based firearm in existence can be fired faster than one round per second. Yes, this even includes single-shot guns.

Not my problem

A firing rate and magazine capacity requirement can be established. Anything above is labeled an “assault weapon”

Up to gun manufacturers to figure out how to comply

 

[bripat9643]

Is one of these an "assault rifle"? If so, which one?

depending on the use both are assault rifles,,,


thankfully the 2nd amendment covers both

The second amendment covers all arms, and fools do not even know that all arms are not available to them so a2 is moot

Covers all arms? Ummmm no it doesn't. It seems to leave out machine guns...and I would argue assault weapons for the same reason

No gun is mentioned in the 2nd Amendment much less any type of rifle or modern military hardware. Just Arms.

But then again didn't the Constitution ban a standing army too?

When Founding Fathers said "arms," they meant all arms that a professional army might employ, including cannon.

 

[bripat9643]

rightwinger - Yea, you can tag it "funny", but you can't explain how you would implement a "one round per second" mechanism.

What's really funny is the inherent dishonesty of the "gun control" nuts. If they had the slightest bit of sincerity they'd educate themselves about firearms and propose real-world solutions based on knowledge.

The fact is, every cartridge based firearm in existence can be fired faster than one round per second. Yes, this even includes single-shot guns.

Not my problem

A firing rate and magazine capacity requirement can be established. Anything above is labeled an “assault weapon”

Up to gun manufacturers to figure out how to comply

Who gave you the authority to impose that rule on anyone?

 

[rightwinger]

Is one of these an "assault rifle"? If so, which one?

depending on the use both are assault rifles,,,


thankfully the 2nd amendment covers both

The second amendment covers all arms, and fools do not even know that all arms are not available to them so a2 is moot

Covers all arms? Ummmm no it doesn't. It seems to leave out machine guns...and I would argue assault weapons for the same reason

No gun is mentioned in the 2nd Amendment much less any type of rifle or modern military hardware. Just Arms.

But then again didn't the Constitution ban a standing army too?

When Founding Fathers said "arms," they meant all arms that a professional army might employ, including cannon.

Nope

 

[rightwinger]

rightwinger - Yea, you can tag it "funny", but you can't explain how you would implement a "one round per second" mechanism.

What's really funny is the inherent dishonesty of the "gun control" nuts. If they had the slightest bit of sincerity they'd educate themselves about firearms and propose real-world solutions based on knowledge.

The fact is, every cartridge based firearm in existence can be fired faster than one round per second. Yes, this even includes single-shot guns.

Not my problem

A firing rate and magazine capacity requirement can be established. Anything above is labeled an “assault weapon”

Up to gun manufacturers to figure out how to comply

Who gave you the authority to impose that rule on anyone?

The OP asked to define an assault weapon

I did

 

[iceberg]

This meets the Left's definition of an assault rifle. No more Olympic Biathlon.

View attachment 274648

I don’t think a bolt action rifle qualifies as an assault rifle

We are thinking more AK 47

you said - any gun that can fire more than a round a second you'd call an assault rifle.

You Can Shoot a Bolt-Action Almost as Fast as a Semi-Auto

now then yes, you're desire to snark on and get "cute" encompasses even bolt action rifles and again, makes you look the fool for chasing something you obviously don't understand as if that gives you some right to dictate control over it.

go study up and stop looking so stupid with every passing statement.

Ok...if you insist, we can ban those too

You got one shot per second. If gun owners start suffering huge casualties because they can’t fire faster than a shot per second, we can reassess the requirement

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

And eliminates all guns have xcept muskets.

Like I said, keep showing why compromises will never happen.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

see what i mean? you can't even define what you want to ban - you just will ban MORE when you find out you've been wrong about what you THOUGHT you knew.

Which supports our conclusion that the real goal is a complete ban and confiscation.

The defense rests.

.

 

[Blues Man]

This meets the Left's definition of an assault rifle. No more Olympic Biathlon.

View attachment 274648

I don’t think a bolt action rifle qualifies as an assault rifle

We are thinking more AK 47

you said - any gun that can fire more than a round a second you'd call an assault rifle.

You Can Shoot a Bolt-Action Almost as Fast as a Semi-Auto

now then yes, you're desire to snark on and get "cute" encompasses even bolt action rifles and again, makes you look the fool for chasing something you obviously don't understand as if that gives you some right to dictate control over it.

go study up and stop looking so stupid with every passing statement.

Ok...if you insist, we can ban those too

You got one shot per second. If gun owners start suffering huge casualties because they can’t fire faster than a shot per second, we can reassess the requirement

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

That would make your antique six shooter an "assault weapon"

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

rightwinger - Yea, you can tag it "funny", but you can't explain how you would implement a "one round per second" mechanism.

What's really funny is the inherent dishonesty of the "gun control" nuts. If they had the slightest bit of sincerity they'd educate themselves about firearms and propose real-world solutions based on knowledge.

The fact is, every cartridge based firearm in existence can be fired faster than one round per second. Yes, this even includes single-shot guns.

Not my problem

A firing rate and magazine capacity requirement can be established. Anything above is labeled an “assault weapon”

Up to gun manufacturers to figure out how to comply

Who gave you the authority to impose that rule on anyone?

The OP asked to define an assault weapon

I did

So, you really want a complete ban and confiscation of all firearms manufactured after 1830?

That is exactly what we thought.

Thank you for confirming.

.

 

[rightwinger]

I don’t think a bolt action rifle qualifies as an assault rifle

We are thinking more AK 47

you said - any gun that can fire more than a round a second you'd call an assault rifle.

You Can Shoot a Bolt-Action Almost as Fast as a Semi-Auto

now then yes, you're desire to snark on and get "cute" encompasses even bolt action rifles and again, makes you look the fool for chasing something you obviously don't understand as if that gives you some right to dictate control over it.

go study up and stop looking so stupid with every passing statement.

Ok...if you insist, we can ban those too

You got one shot per second. If gun owners start suffering huge casualties because they can’t fire faster than a shot per second, we can reassess the requirement

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

And eliminates all guns have xcept muskets.

Like I said, keep showing why compromises will never happen.

OK....lets compromise

3 shots every 2 seconds
That’s 15 shots in ten seconds
Why would anyone need more?

 

[Blues Man]

you said - any gun that can fire more than a round a second you'd call an assault rifle.

You Can Shoot a Bolt-Action Almost as Fast as a Semi-Auto

now then yes, you're desire to snark on and get "cute" encompasses even bolt action rifles and again, makes you look the fool for chasing something you obviously don't understand as if that gives you some right to dictate control over it.

go study up and stop looking so stupid with every passing statement.

Ok...if you insist, we can ban those too

You got one shot per second. If gun owners start suffering huge casualties because they can’t fire faster than a shot per second, we can reassess the requirement

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

And eliminates all guns have xcept muskets.

Like I said, keep showing why compromises will never happen.

OK....lets compromise

3 shots every 2 seconds
That’s 15 shots in ten seconds
Why would anyone need more?

What's wrong with one round per trigger pull?

 

[rightwinger]

rightwinger - Yea, you can tag it "funny", but you can't explain how you would implement a "one round per second" mechanism.

What's really funny is the inherent dishonesty of the "gun control" nuts. If they had the slightest bit of sincerity they'd educate themselves about firearms and propose real-world solutions based on knowledge.

The fact is, every cartridge based firearm in existence can be fired faster than one round per second. Yes, this even includes single-shot guns.

Not my problem

A firing rate and magazine capacity requirement can be established. Anything above is labeled an “assault weapon”

Up to gun manufacturers to figure out how to comply

Who gave you the authority to impose that rule on anyone?

The OP asked to define an assault weapon

I did

So, you really want a complete ban and confiscation of all firearms manufactured after 1830?

That is exactly what we thought.

Thank you for confirming.

.

No
I want to keep America safe

 

[rightwinger]

Ok...if you insist, we can ban those too

You got one shot per second. If gun owners start suffering huge casualties because they can’t fire faster than a shot per second, we can reassess the requirement

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

And eliminates all guns have xcept muskets.

Like I said, keep showing why compromises will never happen.

OK....lets compromise

3 shots every 2 seconds
That’s 15 shots in ten seconds
Why would anyone need more?

What's wrong with one round per trigger pull?

Opens up too much ambiguity

The OP and other gun enthusiasts mockingly say you can’t define an Assault Weapon
I’m saying limit magazine capacity and firing rate and you have a definition

 

[BlindBoo]

/——/ The 2nd Amendment does not specify what weapons since the Founding Fathers had no idea what new weapons would be developed in the future.

They had no idea we would have 30,000 gun deaths a year

They also had no idea that a single person could, on their own with no fact check or restraint, write something that could be read by virtually everyone in the world in a matter of seconds. If you are going to allow changing circumstances to justify voiding a part of the Constitution without going through the legal process to amend it, you're opening up the other parts of it to the same treatment. IOW, be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.

A2 was already changed or is being ignored. You have no right to militia capable arms

No gun is mentioned in the 2nd Amendment much less any type of rifle or modern military hardware. Just Arms.

This must mean the right to own and use an AR15 is protected by the constitution.

But then again didn't the Constitution ban a standing army too?

Nothing in the Constitution even hints as such a thing.

"but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years"

Thank you for confirming that nothing in the constitution hints at a ban on a standing army.

Is one of these an "assault rifle"? If so, which one?

depending on the use both are assault rifles,,,


thankfully the 2nd amendment covers both

The second amendment covers all arms, and fools do not even know that all arms are not available to them so a2 is moot

Covers all arms? Ummmm no it doesn't. It seems to leave out machine guns...and I would argue assault weapons for the same reason

No gun is mentioned in the 2nd Amendment much less any type of rifle or modern military hardware. Just Arms.

But then again didn't the Constitution ban a standing army too?

When Founding Fathers said "arms," they meant all arms that a professional army might employ, including cannon.

Well not a professional army but at least ones that a Well Regulated Militia might need to protect the free state while the government raises an provisions an Army if necessary. Wow, times sure have changed.

 

[Blues Man]

Your ever changing rules are a strong indicator of your dumbassness.

But you have shown why "common sense" laws will never happen.

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

And eliminates all guns have xcept muskets.

Like I said, keep showing why compromises will never happen.

OK....lets compromise

3 shots every 2 seconds
That’s 15 shots in ten seconds
Why would anyone need more?

What's wrong with one round per trigger pull?

Opens up too much ambiguity

The OP and other gun enthusiasts mockingly say you can’t define an Assault Weapon
I’m saying limit magazine capacity and firing rate and you have a definition

No it doesn't

Almost every firearm in existence today fires one round per trigger pull

WHat you are trying to do is label every single firearm as an "assault" weapon

The actual definition has been given

And assault rifle is a military weapon with the capability of burst and or fully automatic fire

 

[rightwinger]

The OP mockingly claims......You are unable to define an assault weapon

I am merely providing an enforceable definition
One round per second

Rate of fire is definable and enforceable

And eliminates all guns have xcept muskets.

Like I said, keep showing why compromises will never happen.

OK....lets compromise

3 shots every 2 seconds
That’s 15 shots in ten seconds
Why would anyone need more?

What's wrong with one round per trigger pull?

Opens up too much ambiguity

The OP and other gun enthusiasts mockingly say you can’t define an Assault Weapon
I’m saying limit magazine capacity and firing rate and you have a definition

No it doesn't

Almost every firearm in existence today fires one round per trigger pull

WHat you are trying to do is label every single firearm as an "assault" weapon

The actual definition has been given

And assault rifle is a military weapon with the capability of burst and or fully automatic fire

So you want to negotiate on firing rate?

An AR-15 fires three rounds per second
What rate do you want as a threshold for Assault Weapon?