What is happening to white people in US sports?

...

The U.S. nurtures its best players in leagues that are determined by AGE group or by CLASS in school. European countries nurture their best players according to SKILL LEVEL, ignoring age. All sports.

I have been preaching here for years that school sports are stupid and should be abolished. ...
Because American basketball players are no good at all, right moron? You have repeated your OCD rant against school sports a thousand times, obviously because you (pathetically) still have childhood trauma over your clumsy weakness that you never outgrew. No other reason is evident.
 
A large % of "blacks" in the NFL and NBA are biracial, not black.
 
Club sports good; schools sports stupid, counterproductive.

The rest of the world can't all be wrong. Even Canadians can see it.
 
Considering that 62% of the US population is white
Really?
656a1807843d19ee16ef023fae17dd94.png
 
I think it's because of the policy. In the 60s, American sports sharply turned black, they began to dominate, including in boxing. This is in line with the politics of the movies, where they even play cowboys. The goal is to create public opinion that there are about half of them in America and they are settled evenly everywhere. Foreigners think so now. This will help black and leftish to make this picture a reality.
In terms of physical condition, according to my observations, they have enough strength, but they are slow, they have little explosive athletic strength. Foreman was a powerful puncher, but very slow. This is also confirmed by the fact that they are not in CrossFit. It requires explosive strength and anaerobic endurance. The upbringing of highly specialized athletes cannot be taken into account here, because it is anthropometry, pharmaceuticals and sports politics, it is mass fitness that is indicative here.

In particular, they play basketball no better than Europeans in general, just in Europe there is no clear policy regarding the priorities of black sports.
 
Nowadays, professional sport is not an indicator at all, it is pure politics and synthetics. There are now many tops from the Caucasus in Russian fight sport, Khabib Nurmagomedov wins by holding leg of opponent, but in small promotions, tajiks and uzbeks often win, who get tired after hard work on construction sites, and they show real battles, not ones that help sleep. They almost absent in the big promotions, and they usualy go up via caucausian fight clubs

Tajik politicians teach people that fighting sport does not correspond to Islamic principles, and hinder the development of sports. For some reason, the Arabs and Caucasians do not do this, although it is they who promote Islam
 
Running, jumping, and throwing are important abilities going all the way back to the beginning of humanity. Whites seemed to have done fine for 200,000 years until the modern NFL and NBA. Now, suddenly, whites seem to be going the way of the Neanderthals in contemporary US sports. Are there any experts studying this?
"White" cannot be generalized either. Strictly speaking, only the Nordic race is called white in anthropology and racial studies, and this is not even the majority of Europeans, and probably not more than 5% of Americans. It is the Nordic race that is anthropometrically close to the classic black Africans, it is believed that both are of a gracial type(this means thin bone and long limbs.).
The sport originated in the military equestrian cultures of the East, in the Aryan cultures, including Olympic athletics. Probably this may be due to both genetics and the way of life of the ancient Aryans, they were all warriors, and military training in itself is a sport and they gave rise to all ancient sports disciplines.

Most of the "whites" were agroworkers, and this did not contribute to evolution in an athletic sense, with the exception of aerobic endurance. African Americans in the United States were also agriculturalists.

In general, it is difficult to find even one sport that does not come from military training. Even playing sports like football are practiced in southeast Asia in the martial arts as training in general physical form and striking technique. Chess is also a war game, which is why it is considered not just a game but a sport.
 
Last edited:
Whites have had it too easy for too long. Put them in a ghetto to live and they will be hoopin in no time.
 
In general, it is a completely idiotic view that supposedly extreme living conditions, which include a lack of food and much work, lead to the fact that a person becomes stronger. This is absolute nonsense. The athlete needs proper nutrition and rest, otherwise he will not achieve anything. Overtraining also leads to regression.

Prison in some countries is an example of this progress. This "progress" is not in the direction of sports power, but in the direction of predation, meanness and deceit. Strong is the one who is adapted and there are no "sports" competitions, on the contrary, they do not like it there.
 
Many famous athletes are engaged in outright lies when they talk about the fact that they allegedly achieved success due to the fact that they endured and trained more than others. Anyone who played sports knows that this is a lie, that additional loads will only reduce results and disrupt the training schedule, there is a recovery limit, above which you can only jump with the help of pharmaceuticals, and you will still quickly reach the limit.
I think that this is a specially paid lie, which leads to the fact that ordinary inexperienced guys struggle and do not achieve anything, this is what they need.
 

Forum List

Back
Top