Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn that 14th amendment.
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
The Bill of Rights doesn't "imply" anything, it clearly states the rights...but because the Bill of Rights limits the power of the collectivists they have to pretend that things are "implied" even when they are specifically stated.
Nowhere in that document does it say right to privacy. There is no express right to privacy. Whence did it come?
Hence, it is implied.
The BOR, a collection of limits on the entity charged with enforcing the limits on the entity charged with enforcing the limits.....A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
Any wonder why the have eroded over time?
A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations as they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
It is not that it does not exist, its that it does not supersede the inherent right of the State Legislatures, my misgivings with implied rights aside.
Separate but equal was an implied right of the States, and look what that got us.
Damn that 14th amendment.
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
The Bill of Rights doesn't "imply" anything, it clearly states the rights...but because the Bill of Rights limits the power of the collectivists they have to pretend that things are "implied" even when they are specifically stated.
Nowhere in that document does it say right to privacy. There is no express right to privacy. Whence did it come?
Hence, it is implied.
Ok, cool. It strikes me odd Liberals would forget this SCOTUS ruling, involving contraceptive rights of all things. This debunks your argument:
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Griswold v. Connecticut LII Legal Information Institute
A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
ok koolaid drinker. show me on thing in the bill of rights that authorizes the government to change anything. go one step further, change it on their ownSpoonman said:
“A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.”
The only 'lesson' for liberals is further confirmation of your ignorance of the law, along with that of most other conservatives.
In addition to being wrong, this also fails as a straw man fallacy, as no liberal believes the Bill of Rights authorizes “the government...to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.” Indeed, such a notion is ridiculous nonsense.
Although inalienable, the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights are not absolute, and subject to reasonable restrictions by government (see, e.g., DC v. Heller (2008)). When government seeks to limit, preempt, or restrict citizens' civil liberties, the burden to justify such an act rests solely with government, and when government fails to justify measures limiting citizens' rights, those laws are invalidated by the courts as authorized by the jurisprudence predicated on the first ten Amendments to the Constitution.
Government isn't 'changing' or 'reinterpreting' anything. When government enacts measures citizens believe to adversely effect their civil rights, they are at liberty to challenge those measures in court to seek relief. And when the courts rule that a given measure passes Constitutional muster, it is done so in accordance with Constitutional case law, where the Bill of Rights is neither 'changed' nor 'reinterpreted.'
As for the linked op-ed, it's nothing more than ignorant demagoguery and hyperbole; the courts alone are authorized to determine if government is 'chipping away' at the rights enshrined in the 4th Amendment, or any of the other Amendments, for that matter.
ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations. As they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations. As they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
It's a perfect example of why we have such a large government. The far left all think like that.
They all think that the bill of rights is implied and they think that they can interpret the words to fit their ideology.
This is ignorant, meaningless gibberish.ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations. As they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
It's a perfect example of why we have such a large government. The far left all think like that.
They all think that the bill of rights is implied and they think that they can interpret the words to fit their ideology.
The right to privacy and all other rights are protected by the Fourth and Ninth Amendments.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations as they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
The 14th should be repealed.Damn that 14th amendment.
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
The Bill of Rights doesn't "imply" anything, it clearly states the rights...but because the Bill of Rights limits the power of the collectivists they have to pretend that things are "implied" even when they are specifically stated.
Nowhere in that document does it say right to privacy. There is no express right to privacy. Whence did it come?
Hence, it is implied.
Right to privacy: to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsThe right to privacy can be found here in the Bill of Rights:
“The Fourth and Fifth Amendments were described in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 630 , as protection against all governmental invasions "of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life." * We recently referred [381 U.S. 479, 485] in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 656 , to the Fourth Amendment as creating a "right to privacy, no less important than any other right carefully and particularly reserved to the people." See Beaney, The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 1962 Sup. Ct. Rev. 212; Griswold, The Right to be Let Alone, 55 Nw. U. L. Rev. 216 (1960).”
FindLaw Cases and Codes
That the word 'privacy' was not in common use during the Foundation Era is irrelevant, as clearly the concept of privacy was understood by the Framers, hence their desire to make citizens immune from government attack, to safeguard their right to privacy, by codifying that right in the first ten Amendments to the Constitution.
The right to privacy and any other right are protected by the Fourth and Ninth Amendments.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations as they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
The Bill of Rights , demanded by James Madison protected our rights from the Federal AND State governments.
The 14th should be repealed.Damn that 14th amendment.
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
The Bill of Rights doesn't "imply" anything, it clearly states the rights...but because the Bill of Rights limits the power of the collectivists they have to pretend that things are "implied" even when they are specifically stated.
Nowhere in that document does it say right to privacy. There is no express right to privacy. Whence did it come?
Hence, it is implied.
It was passed at bayonet point during Reconstruction.
This is ignorant, meaningless gibberish.ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations. As they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
It's a perfect example of why we have such a large government. The far left all think like that.
They all think that the bill of rights is implied and they think that they can interpret the words to fit their ideology.
This is ignorant, meaningless gibberish.ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.A lesson for liberals. The bill of rights is to protect the people from government. Not something the government is free to change and reinterpret to gain greater control over the people.
Local Law Enforcement Chipping Away at the Fourth Amendment Peter Van Buren
its time to stand up for and take back our rights. send any and every politician who even hints at infringing on our rights packing. Zero tolerance for their reinterpretations.
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the People from their government. That's quite literally becoming history today as new challenges, now from local law enforcement, chip away at the Fourth Amendment's protections of privacy. New laws and devices spread spying on Americans to the local level.
A Brief Explanation of Post-Constitutional America
The cornerstone of the Bill of Rights was that the People grant exceptions to those rights to the Government. Absent those specific exceptions, the rest of the stuff was inalienable, not up for grabs, not dependent in any way on Government's decision to grant or withhold them. Constitutional America was clearly imperfect, but the underlying premise spoke of a striving toward an ideal.
The cornerstone of Post-Constitutional America is just the opposite. The People have what rights the Government chooses to allow them to have, such that privacy is the exception, free speech a variable, torture a tool to be used or withheld as the Government finds appropriate. It is a turning on its head of Constitutional America, back to a time when a tyrant and king (may we call old King George an "evil dictator" to use the preferred language of today?) controlled Americans' daily lives by decree.
A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations. As they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
It's a perfect example of why we have such a large government. The far left all think like that.
They all think that the bill of rights is implied and they think that they can interpret the words to fit their ideology.
It's a fact!!
Don't take my word for it do the research on it yourself.
Liberals believe, as a matter of their ideology, that the ends justify the means. We see it in practice every day. Liberals routinely distort facts and manipulate language to achieve their ends. Manufactured projection is one of their most effective tools.
This is ignorant, meaningless gibberish.ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.A lesson for whatever you may call yourself.
The Bill of Rights is actually called the Bill of Federal Limitations. As they were between the Federal government and the State governments. They didn't pertain to you and I.
They didn't pertain to you and I until they were incorporated. Not all of those listed have been incorporated.
Bill Of Rights
The right to privacy is not listed. It's implied. Liberals understand this and attempt to protect it.
The group of people that you need to educate are those that insist that the right to privacy is not listed and, therefore, not a real right. Those are right wing folks. Please educate them.
It's a perfect example of why we have such a large government. The far left all think like that.
They all think that the bill of rights is implied and they think that they can interpret the words to fit their ideology.
It's a fact!!
Don't take my word for it do the research on it yourself.
Liberals believe, as a matter of their ideology, that the ends justify the means. We see it in practice every day. Liberals routinely distort facts and manipulate language to achieve their ends. Manufactured projection is one of their most effective tools.
No. People like you do though. You lie through your teeth. Just like right now.
This is ignorant, meaningless gibberish.ok, you've had enough koolaid, put the glass down. That has to be one of the wackiest interpretations of the bill of rights I have ever heard.
It's a perfect example of why we have such a large government. The far left all think like that.
They all think that the bill of rights is implied and they think that they can interpret the words to fit their ideology.
It's a fact!!
Don't take my word for it do the research on it yourself.
Liberals believe, as a matter of their ideology, that the ends justify the means. We see it in practice every day. Liberals routinely distort facts and manipulate language to achieve their ends. Manufactured projection is one of their most effective tools.
No. People like you do though. You lie through your teeth. Just like right now.
That is the lefts problem they don't believe when the truth is spoken and turn and call people names rather than doing actual research.
Look it up.
