Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is being reported now that Obama and his EPA broke the law...one of many times the Liberal Party's leader has violated both Constitution and law...
The question on which this thread is based is looking easier and easier to answer each passing minute...
The FBI is investigating whether Hillary aides may have broken the law, she is not a target as much as you would like to believe.
First you lie, then when caught you try to play it off. Well at least you admit it.
It is being reported now that Obama and his EPA broke the law...one of many times the Liberal Party's leader has violated both Constitution and law...
The question on which this thread is based is looking easier and easier to answer each passing minute...
Obama is not running for president. Try and keep it focused on candidates who want to be president and how much they lie, that's the point of the OP.
It is being reported now that Obama and his EPA broke the law...one of many times the Liberal Party's leader has violated both Constitution and law...
The question on which this thread is based is looking easier and easier to answer each passing minute...
Obama is not running for president. Try and keep it focused on candidates who want to be president and how much they lie, that's the point of the OP.
Your 'study' had both Obama and Bill Clinton listed.
It is being reported now that Obama and his EPA broke the law...one of many times the Liberal Party's leader has violated both Constitution and law...
The question on which this thread is based is looking easier and easier to answer each passing minute...
Obama is not running for president. Try and keep it focused on candidates who want to be president and how much they lie, that's the point of the OP.
Your 'study' had both Obama and Bill Clinton listed.
My point is still valid, the OP has nothing to do with people who have been president, only with those that want to be.
My point is still valid,
It is being reported now that Obama and his EPA broke the law...one of many times the Liberal Party's leader has violated both Constitution and law...
The question on which this thread is based is looking easier and easier to answer each passing minute...
Obama is not running for president. Try and keep it focused on candidates who want to be president and how much they lie, that's the point of the OP.
Your 'study' had both Obama and Bill Clinton listed.
My point is still valid, the OP has nothing to do with people who have been president, only with those that want to be.
My point is still valid,
With 2 two term presidents in your study, your point is INvalid
I kind of knew that these responses would pop up but I must say if my leading candidates were lying 2/3, 75% or almost 85% of the time I would be damn pissed about it.
bud, your 'study' has Hillary at 28%, and Obama at 26%.
Only a complete idiot would believe it
It is being reported now that Obama and his EPA broke the law...one of many times the Liberal Party's leader has violated both Constitution and law...
The question on which this thread is based is looking easier and easier to answer each passing minute...
Obama is not running for president. Try and keep it focused on candidates who want to be president and how much they lie, that's the point of the OP.
Your 'study' had both Obama and Bill Clinton listed.
My point is still valid, the OP has nothing to do with people who have been president, only with those that want to be.
My point is still valid,
With 2 two term presidents in your study, your point is INvalid
Not true since the OP is about candidates. The study also mentions Dick Cheney and I'm pretty sure he was never a candidate.
I kind of knew that these responses would pop up but I must say if my leading candidates were lying 2/3, 75% or almost 85% of the time I would be damn pissed about it.
bud, your 'study' has Hillary at 28%, and Obama at 26%.
Only a complete idiot would believe it
Actually the idiot is someone who disputes hard data with nothing but his opinion.
Obama is not running for president. Try and keep it focused on candidates who want to be president and how much they lie, that's the point of the OP.
Your 'study' had both Obama and Bill Clinton listed.
My point is still valid, the OP has nothing to do with people who have been president, only with those that want to be.
My point is still valid,
With 2 two term presidents in your study, your point is INvalid
Not true since the OP is about candidates. The study also mentions Dick Cheney and I'm pretty sure he was never a candidate.
If you want it to be only about candidates, find a 'study' with only candidates on it.
Your 'study' had both Obama and Bill Clinton listed.
My point is still valid, the OP has nothing to do with people who have been president, only with those that want to be.
My point is still valid,
With 2 two term presidents in your study, your point is INvalid
Not true since the OP is about candidates. The study also mentions Dick Cheney and I'm pretty sure he was never a candidate.
If you want it to be only about candidates, find a 'study' with only candidates on it.
Include them if you want, it doesn't change the fact that Republicans running for the presidency are lying three times as much as Democrats.
That's right, mark it funny and avoid challenging the Op with any proof of your own. Must suck to have to argue from a position like that.
I think it could go either way. What is truthful is this: The next candidate that says "This Election isn't about me..." should get tomatoes hurled at her/his dome.
As long as Trump is in the contest, the GOP has a credibility problem. As long as Ted Cruz is in the contest, America is in danger.
As long as Trump is in the contest, the GOP has a credibility problem
That's right, mark it funny and avoid challenging the Op with any proof of your own. Must suck to have to argue from a position like that.
Not as much as it must suck to use a partisan 'study' to make a point.
I think it could go either way. What is truthful is this: The next candidate that says "This Election isn't about me..." should get tomatoes hurled at her/his dome.
As long as Trump is in the contest, the GOP has a credibility problem. As long as Ted Cruz is in the contest, America is in danger.
As long as Trump is in the contest, the GOP has a credibility problem
as long as Hillary is in the contest, the DNC has a credibility problem.
That's right, mark it funny and avoid challenging the Op with any proof of your own. Must suck to have to argue from a position like that.
Not as much as it must suck to use a partisan 'study' to make a point.
Fine. Would you like to use their examples and argue each one on its own merits?
I think it could go either way. What is truthful is this: The next candidate that says "This Election isn't about me..." should get tomatoes hurled at her/his dome.
As long as Trump is in the contest, the GOP has a credibility problem. As long as Ted Cruz is in the contest, America is in danger.
As long as Trump is in the contest, the GOP has a credibility problem
as long as Hillary is in the contest, the DNC has a credibility problem.
Man, the GOP has been reduced to a bunch of scared little boys by Ms. Clinton.
That's right, mark it funny and avoid challenging the Op with any proof of your own. Must suck to have to argue from a position like that.
Not as much as it must suck to use a partisan 'study' to make a point.
Fine. Would you like to use their examples and argue each one on its own merits?
Neither has any merits.
