Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Other than to silence him so he won't expose all of the liberals trying to imprison him for nothing. I asked this question in another thread but I wanted to also make a new thread about it to give more people the chance to answer it. (People on the left mostly.) So, anybody got anything?
It is perfectly permissible speech to maintain innocence, to maintain persecution, and to identify the judges conflicts with his daughter working for those trying to imprison TrumpHe is going way beyond that and making wild unfounded accusations
The place to do that is within the trial.
Why doesn’t he have his lawyers make those accusations?
Who are these so called terrorist who haven’t done anything so far?he is calling on his terrorists to threaten with the judges, prosecutors , and jurors and their families.
he needs to be gagged and kept away from a computer so that he can get a fair trial.
The same reason gag orders are usually put in place. To protect the integrity of the proceedings. To prevent witnesses or members of the jury from being intimidated.
Because Presidential candidates should be above the law?Placing a gag order on the leading Presidential candidate is ridiculous.
Gag orders are rare. Gag orders on criminal defendants are even more rare.See, the judicial branch doesn't give a hoot about your opinion of the trial. Once started it goes by certain rules. Rules that don't, and aren't supposed to be ruled by political preferences. Trump has all the rights that other criminal defendants do. Rules that don't include using a f-ucking megaphone to disparage witnesses or jurors. His lawyers can cross. He needs to shut up. Just like every other person in his position.
At least you're honest enough to acknowledge all this lawfare bullshit is a political act by Biden. Kudos.Trump has set himself to come out of this spat with the judge, to be the big winner.
But he's also gambling with the risk of being humiliated and becoming the 'biggest loser'.
Rhetorically speaking, Biden and America's government are ready to hold the political gun to Trump's head. It will be too late if Trump takes the antiwar stand that's expected of him.
Because the witnesses aren't the defendant. And any comment they give outside of the proceedings can and will be undoubtably part of the cross-examinations of the defense lawyers. As far as the family members of the court are concerned. What comment do you suppose they have given in order to necessitate a gag order? I'm not aware those comments are admissible in court even.Why aren't the witnesses gagged to protect the integrity of the proceedings? Or the family members of the court?
Sure, rare but not even remotely unheard off, in fact quite common in high profile cases. So, what's your point?Gag orders are rare. Gag orders on criminal defendants are even more rare.
Because the witnesses aren't the defendant.
OK. so?And any comment they give outside of the proceedings can and will be undoubtably part of the cross-examinations of the defense lawyers.
Making campaign ads regarding the trial that raises millions of dollars for Trump opponents. Can't think of anything more injurious to the integrity of the proceeding.As far as the family members of the court are concerned. What comment do you suppose they have given in order to necessitate a gag order? I'm not aware those comments are even admissible in court even.
Bullshit. Name another high profile criminal defendant that was gaggedSure, rare but not even remotely unheard off, in fact quite common in high profile cases.
That this hyperpartisan Judge's gag order is unconstitutional and 1,000% directed at keep a Presidential candidate from the opposing party from speaking about one of the most significant issues in the campaign.So, what's your point?
Not profound, just factual. They aren't on trial. Trump is.Wow. Profound
So, any prejudicial comment they make can be challenged, in court in front of the jury, by a professional lawyer. A witness doesn't have that luxury. They are there to answer questions.OK. so?
Something done BEFORE the trial can't by definition be "injurious to the proceedings", since the proceedings haven't started. Lucky Trump, since he's attacked people for years. Including those that he can't now. Do you think a judge can apply gag orders retroactively?Making campaign ads regarding the trial that raises millions of dollars for Trump opponents. Can't think of anything more injurious to the integrity of the proceeding.
- In 2018, Stormy Daniels' lawyer, Michael Avenatti, was issued a gag order by a federal judge in a case involving President Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen. The order prohibited Avenatti from discussing the case with the media or public.
- In 2019, a judge in Virginia issued a gag order in a case involving a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville. The order prohibited the parties involved from discussing the case with the media.
- In 2020, a judge in Massachusetts issued a gag order in a case involving actress Lori Loughlin and the college admissions scandal. The order prohibited the parties involved from discussing the case with the media.
The reasons for having to gag Trump have been clearly stated.
Sure. How many?
- In 2018, Stormy Daniels' lawyer, Michael Avenatti, was issued a gag order by a federal judge in a case involving President Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen. The order prohibited Avenatti from discussing the case with the media or public.
- In 2019, a judge in Virginia issued a gag order in a case involving a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville. The order prohibited the parties involved from discussing the case with the media.
- In 2020, a judge in Massachusetts issued a gag order in a case involving actress Lori Loughlin and the college admissions scandal. The order prohibited the parties involved from discussing the case with the media.
Why is Trump involved in this sham to begin with Dimwinger?
Trump can't intimidate jurors, witnesses etc...that's it...like any other mob boss or criminal or civil defendant on trial.
OP, what do you think the gag order is for?
I know. I just can't resist when they seem to cockily claim "no leftie can answer this question", posing some gotcha question that a toddler can answer without breaking a sweat.
And it’s incredibly commie and un American to put this powerful political opponent on trial for just that
he is calling on his terrorists to threaten with the judges, prosecutors , and jurors and their families.
he needs to be gagged and kept away from a computer so that he can get a fair trial.
Gag orders are rare. Gag orders on criminal defendants are even more rare.
You are dead wrong that you believe Mr. Trump is being silenced.Other than to silence him so he won't expose all of the liberals trying to imprison him for nothing. I asked this question in another thread but I wanted to also make a new thread about it to give more people the chance to answer it. (People on the left mostly.) So, anybody got anything?
I don't see the word defendant anywhere.
Not profound, just factual. They aren't on trial. Trump is.
Tainting the jury poolSo, any prejudicial comment they make can be challenged, in court in front of the jury, by a professional lawyer. A witness doesn't have that luxury. They are there to answer questions.
Something done BEFORE the trial can't by definition be "injurious to the proceedings", since the proceedings haven't started.
I think this judge should have recused himself for a direct conflict.Lucky Trump, since he's attacked people for years. Including those that he can't now. Do you think a judge can apply gag orders retroactively?
You are dead wrong that you believe Mr. Trump is being silenced.
He is gagged to stop threatening the court, its processes, and its peoples.
In May 2020, Loughlin entered a plea of guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and Giannulli entered a plea of guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud.
California Couple in College Admissions Case Sentenced to Prison
BOSTON – Lori Loughlin and Mossimo Giannulli were sentenced to two months and five months in prison, respectively, in connection with securing the fraudulent admission of their two daughters to the University of Southern California (USC) as purported athletic recruits.www.justice.gov
A person accused in a case civil or criminal is a defendant. But hey, I can't prevent you from being deliberately obtuse.
Road Runner, your belief is based on your feelings not facts.
tRump knows thisTrump cannot intimidate jurors or witnesses.
