Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I love how you seem to gloss over the fact that OTHER PARTIES include the actual defendant.Pssst, Avanati was not the defendant.
- In 2018, Stormy Daniels' lawyer, Michael Avenatti, was issued a gag order by a federal judge in a case involving President Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen. The order prohibited Avenatti from discussing the case with the media or public.
- In 2019, a judge in Virginia issued a gag order in a case involving a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville. The order prohibited the parties involved from discussing the case with the media.
- In 2020, a judge in Massachusetts issued a gag order in a case involving actress Lori Loughlin and the college admissions scandal. The order prohibited the parties involved from discussing the case with the media.
"[This] Court makes an oral order that no counsel may discuss
anything connected with this trial with the media or in public
places. This order encompasses all parties, attorneys and
witnesses under the control of counsel.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered that lawyers and others in the case must not talk about it publicly i
Yet due to a wide-ranging gag order, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and attorneys for victims’ families and witnesses are prohibited from saying anything publicly, aside from what is already in the public record.
I'd be happy with one. You're 0/6 so far.
So why did every citation you provided regarding high profile gag orders include witnessesThe question you posed was why the defendant and not the witness. That's the answer.
Lol Like Cohen having a podcast trashing Trump over the indictment?Lol, hardly. In order to taint a jury pool, you need to specifically address the case.
His daughter is profiting from this trial - a direct conflict for the judge.A general dislike for a defendant doesn't count. If it did no one charged with a serious crime could be prosecuted. Most people don't like criminals.
Nor does working for someone who's politically active count as prejudicial. Especially when the person working is a family member and not yourself.
For what. What is his direct conflict. He didn't post anything his daughter did.
No one has done thatFacts like you can mess with the jurors or witnesses?
I love how you seem to gloss over the fact that OTHER PARTIES include the actual defendant.
QEDAs for instance here. https://www.npr.org/2019/07/16/7423...sing-social-media-as-judge-tightens-gag-order
"Mr. Stone, what am I supposed to do with you?" Jackson said during a more than two-hour hearing. "Whether the problem is you can't follow simple orders or won't, I need to help you out."
Stone wasn't the defendant?
Is that supposed to be a joke?Yes but this is different because Trump is intimidating them just because he's Trump. Nothing that he's saying or doing.
There's your answer above right there.
You don't pay much attention do you ?No one has done that
He has made factual criticism and thats still legal in America. Hurt feelings don’t equal threat or intimidation
He isn’t exposing anyone. He’s trying to intimidate witnesses and jurors, for which he should be sitting in a jail cell.Other than to silence him so he won't expose all of the liberals trying to imprison him for nothing. I asked this question in another thread but I wanted to also make a new thread about it to give more people the chance to answer it. (People on the left mostly.) So, anybody got anything?
No one has done that
He has made factual criticism and that still legal in America. Hurt feelings don’t equal threat or intimidation
Don't feed the sealions.He's only intimidating them by speaking the truth and furthermore why even hold a criminal trial in the first place for this nonsense?
He isn’t exposing anyone. He’s trying to intimidate witnesses and jurors, for which he should be sitting in a jail cell.
No, that’s not what he’s doing. He tells lies daily, like claiming the gag order means he’s not allowed to testify. Justify THAT lie!He's not trying to do anything but claim his innocence. If that causes hurt feelings along the way that's on them not him.
Another active member newby or name change trollYou don't pay much attention do you ?
Trump has been instructed on what he can and cannot say outside the courtThey are not personal attacks when the person spoken about is in fact engaged in what Trump is observing and commenting on
You all just don’t live in reality and haven’t for over 5 years.
Nope. You should really read the gag order before making ignorant false statements.it's what the gag order is all about
No, that’s not what he’s doing. He tells lies daily, like claiming the gag order means he’s not allowed to testify. Justify THAT lie!
NewbyAnother active member newby or name change troll
Already didNope. You should really read the gag order before making ignorant false statements.
Judges run trials and don’t enact new definitions for words and speechTrump has been instructed on what he can and cannot say outside the court
He is too arrogant to comply
He needs to spend some time in a holding cell to get his mind right
Road Runner knows that. These are posts contrived for attention.No, that’s not what he’s doing.
Are you paid or for free?Newby
