What The Hell Does A Normal American Need An Army Assault Weapon For.....Target Practice?

And if someone with more guns were inside?

So the cops arrived quickly? And you want to give up guns and let the cops protect you - RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I want magazine limits. Nobody is using a high cap mag for defense.


High mag capacity is exactly what I want for self defense.

You are an idiot.

Why do you want to make me and my family more vulnerable?

So you think I have a right to protect myself but it should be limited to the number of rounds the government allows me?

Again. You are an idiot.

The gun nuts have been stating you can just quickly change the mag. So it does not make you more vulnerable. Plus the vast majority of defenses involve no shooting. I don't think you could find a single example of anyone ever needing a high cap mag for defense. Don't be so scared.

WE aren't the ones pissing ourselves at the thought of law-abiding citizens being armed and thinking that guns are evil, mind-controlling aliens that force people to execute atrocities. "He'd have been a peaceful, fluffy kitten, but he picked up that AR-15, and suddenly he was a Christian-hating Islamofascist terrorist!"

Yes you are scared and paranoid at the thought of going anywhere without a gun. I go everywhere without, don't be so scared and paranoid. Only mass killers need high cap mags. Also I own many guns.
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a killing machine?

They should not be able to. Look at the carnage at Orlando, nobody should be able to own one.

Yes, because terrorists will just shrug and go, "Oh, we can't get rifles, let's just start a bridge club instead". The murderous intent is due only to the weapons.

Moron.
 
Actually you look like morons again.

Wow, that is the debating skill level of a previous poster, SHE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED.

How many times do you guys need to be proven wrong?

you haven't proven jack shit.

50 dead and 50 injured with an armed defender there. That pretty much shoots down all your BS actually.
1 armed defender who was not expecting a terrorist attack, a metal detector turned off...

Marteen fired at the guard 1st without warning....

It doesn't 'shoot down' anything simply because you say so.

Yes it shoots down all the gun nut claims. Sorry. Armed defender there. Call the gun what you want, it killed many very quickly.
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a killing machine?

They should not be able to. Look at the carnage at Orlando, nobody should be able to own one.

Yes, because terrorists will just shrug and go, "Oh, we can't get rifles, let's just start a bridge club instead". The murderous intent is due only to the weapons.

Moron.

They might get caught trying to buy guns illegally.

FBI thwarts mass shooting at Milwaukee Masonic center

You prefer Orlando over Milwaukee?
 
The Supreme Court alone determines what the Second Amendment means, what restrictions are lawful, and which are not.

And any law or measure not yet subject to review is assumed to be Constitutional, including laws and regulations concerning firearms.
CCJ proving once again he has no idea how his own government functions and no idea what the U.S. Constitution says.

It's simply a fact - the Supreme Court has no such authority. Never has. Never will. Anyone who has actually read the U.S. Constitution would understand that.
 
[QUOTE="
Yes you are scared and paranoid at the thought of going anywhere without a gun. I go everywhere without, don't be so scared and paranoid. Only mass killers need high cap mags. Also I own many guns.[/QUOTE]

Yeah,

And I'm voting Socialist - RIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a killing machine?

They should not be able to. Look at the carnage at Orlando, nobody should be able to own one.

Yes, because terrorists will just shrug and go, "Oh, we can't get rifles, let's just start a bridge club instead". The murderous intent is due only to the weapons.

Moron.

They might get caught trying to buy guns illegally.

FBI thwarts mass shooting at Milwaukee Masonic center

You prefer Orlando over Milwaukee?
Really, you must persist with an untruth.

There is an actual issue here. I don't think it's logically defensible to be against background checks for every legal sale, and stiff punishment for illegal sales that are tied to a crime.
 
the real question is

why are libtards so ignorant about firearms

The real question is why does the right want to arm mass killers so well?

The REAL question is: why does the left want only the killers to be armed?
Because the left is made of two factions: the criminals (how many thugs in prison you think are voting Republican) and the oppressors (elitists like Barry Sorento and Hilldabeast that want power and control over people).
 
Yes you are scared and paranoid at the thought of going anywhere without a gun. I go everywhere without, don't be so scared and paranoid. Only mass killers need high cap mags. Also I own many guns.
You don't own shit unless you think that pathetic appendage between your legs is a gun...
 
Yes you are scared and paranoid at the thought of going anywhere without a gun. I go everywhere without, don't be so scared and paranoid. Only mass killers need high cap mags. Also I own many guns.
You don't own shit unless you think that pathetic appendage between your legs is a gun...

Talking out of your ass. Guess I can write off any gibberish you spew.
 
The Supreme Court alone determines what the Second Amendment means, what restrictions are lawful, and which are not.

And any law or measure not yet subject to review is assumed to be Constitutional, including laws and regulations concerning firearms.
CCJ proving once again he has no idea how his own government functions and no idea what the U.S. Constitution says.

It's simply a fact - the Supreme Court has no such authority. Never has. Never will. Anyone who has actually read the U.S. Constitution would understand that.
We decide, and the Court should stfu! (sarcasm)
 
Yes you are scared and paranoid at the thought of going anywhere without a gun. I go everywhere without, don't be so scared and paranoid. Only mass killers need high cap mags. Also I own many guns.
You don't own shit unless you think that pathetic appendage between your legs is a gun...

Talking out of your ass. Guess I can write off any gibberish you spew.
..you mad bro?
 
Yes you are scared and paranoid at the thought of going anywhere without a gun. I go everywhere without, don't be so scared and paranoid. Only mass killers need high cap mags. Also I own many guns.
You don't own shit unless you think that pathetic appendage between your legs is a gun...

Talking out of your ass. Guess I can write off any gibberish you spew.
..you mad bro?

Laughing at your blatant stupidity.
 
This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a military style killing machine?

If you think a .223 is an assault rifle, you're as loony as the rest of the anti gun left. You'll let us know when we can own real military assault rifles such as the SAW.

Sure kills a lot of people fast.


Any gun can. It's not guns. Its islamic hatred, moral rot and decay that has to be addressed. It's a major insult when politicians tell us that taking guns away will solve our societal problem. But then again, that's how pitifully simple minded they are. It's a disgrace.

Most our mass shooters aren't Islamic..

Increasingly, it has become islamic hatred, mass killings here. That and moral rot. Until those are solved, the violence will only get worse regardless of what's banned. It's in the mind and the soul.....not some inanimate object.
 
2nd amendment retard.




.

When they wrote that, they had muzzle loaders.

So?

So that did not mean semi automatic weapons or pistols. We set up like the Roman Republic, where all states although individual, the citizens would take up arms to defend the Roman Republic.


we no longer need state militias, we have the National Guard and also the US army, navy and AF. There is no need for any civilians guns except for the 6 bullet pistol. No need for citizens to have these weapons.
 
Last edited:
The real question is why shouldn't a lawful american citizen be able to own a semi automatic rifle, which is the proper name for an "Assault weapon".



You read the article about the family of the AR 15 designer who said that their father (designer/builder of AR 15s) had zero intention of it being a weapon for civilians.

How about that?

How about Roe of Roe V Wade being pro life now? We should scrap that as well then, by your logic, right?

Also, GPS wasn't intended for civilians either, so turn off your google map.

Yeah, and don't even get me started on all the things NASA invented for astronauts that's now used by civilian consumers.
 
Wow, that is the debating skill level of a previous poster, SHE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED.

How many times do you guys need to be proven wrong?

you haven't proven jack shit.

50 dead and 50 injured with an armed defender there. That pretty much shoots down all your BS actually.
1 armed defender who was not expecting a terrorist attack, a metal detector turned off...

Marteen fired at the guard 1st without warning....

It doesn't 'shoot down' anything simply because you say so.

Yes it shoots down all the gun nut claims. Sorry. Armed defender there. Call the gun what you want, it killed many very quickly.
THE GUN didn't do a damn thing the terrorist did not 'force' it to do / use it to do.

You ignore the fact that the FBI focused on this guy twice AND identified he had extremist connections. Then they dropped him off their RADAR because he had not done anything illegal. Hmmmm, extremist connections, but you're going to completely ignore him from that point on. How did that work out?

Then the terrorist bought a gun and attacked and murdered Americans. Only a liberal blames Americans after a terrorist attack.

The entire 'Lessons Learned' from this event for Liberals, as reported so far, are:
1) Americans, especially Conservatives, are the real threat
2) Law-abiding American citizens need to be disarmed.

....THAT is ALL the Liberals have walked away with.
 
If I can use a nail gun, firing over 100 nails a minute, as a weapon, is it then considered an 'Assault Nail Gun', and should nail guns therefore be banned?
 

Forum List

Back
Top