What the new immunity ruling will bring....

[Harpy Eagle]

No.

It’s paper ballots cast in person by eligible voters with valid ID and counted that same evening

weird how that was not the definition when Trump won in 2016

 

[westwall]

Which we have had for the past 230 plus years, it has not changed.

No, 2020 was stolen. We have proof of that from three states now.

Links are already out there, go fetch.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Which we have had for the past 230 plus years, it has not changed.

 

[westwall]

weird how that was not the definition when Trump won in 2016

Demofascists hadn't imported 10 million illegal aliens yet.

Now they have.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

weird how that was not the definition when Trump won in 2016

That should have been the standard!

Far and away Trump's biggest fuck up was not using the "Russia hacked our election" narrative to codify: paper ballots, voter ID, up to date database of eligible voters

 

[rampart]

No.

It’s paper ballots cast in person by eligible voters with valid ID and counted that same evening

we will not be voting like that, though, will we?

i don't like what might be going on inside a machine, either, but that won't be fixed by november. (and the "counted by hand that same night" might present problems. - how about counted within a week by an independent accounting firm ?)

but we got to get past this election, as best we can.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

we will not be voting like that, though, will we?

i don't like what might be going on inside a machine, either, but that won't be fixed by november. (and the "counted by hand that same night" might present problems. - how about counted within a week by an independent accounting firm ?)

but we got to get past this election, as best we can.

We should vote like that, but it would be the death of the democrat Party

 

[Redfish]

Just a preview of some of the things future presidents can do now and not fear any legal consequences

Trump amplifies posts calling for televised military tribunal for Liz Cheney

Former President Donald Trump amplified posts on social media calling for a televised military tribunal for former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney and the jailing of top elected officials, including President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

www.yahoo.com

Trump amplifies posts calling for televised military tribunal for Liz Cheney​

This ruling is constitutional and will keep the following out of jail: Obama, Clinton, Bush (both), Carter, Reagan and LBJ (if they could be dug up)

 

[rampart]

We should vote like that, but it would be the death of the democrat Party

is this (transition from machine to paper) being done , small scale anywhere? i'd like to compare

 

[HikerGuy83]

pushed for immunity?

Think about it.

It might come to you......might.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

This ruling is constitutional and will keep the following out of jail: Obama, Clinton, Bush (both), Carter, Reagan and LBJ (if they could be dug up)

It is not constitutional and most of those should have been charged with crimes.

But we have always made our ruling class above the law and now the SCOTUS made it even more official, which will just allow them to do even more shady/illegal/immoral stuff.

And people like you think that is a good thing.

 

[Redfish]

It is not constitutional and most of those should have been charged with crimes.

But we have always made our ruling class above the law and now the SCOTUS made it even more official, which will just allow them to do even more shady/illegal/immoral stuff.

And people like you think that is a good thing.

if presidents do not have immunity for official acts while president, then every president including Washington should have been prosecuted and jailed. This ruling does not authorize murder, treason, or assault of any kind (in or out of office). Its amazing how the lib talking points distort the facts.

 

[Vastator]

if presidents do not have immunity for official acts while president, then every president including Washington should have been prosecuted and jailed. This ruling does not authorize murder, treason, or assault of any kind (in or out of office). Its amazing how the lib talking points distort the facts.

I'm just waiting for one of these idiots to take thier misconstrued understanding of this ruling for a test drive...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

if presidents do not have immunity for official acts while president, then every president including Washington should have been prosecuted and jailed. This ruling does not authorize murder, treason, or assault of any kind (in or out of office). Its amazing how the lib talking points distort the facts.

Murder is a legal term, it is an unlawful killing. Based on this ruling if the POTUS orders someone killed, it is by definition not an unlawful killing...what could possibly go wrong

 

[debbiedowner]

No, 2020 was stolen. We have proof of that from three states now.

Links are already out there, go fetch.

If the links are already out there why didn't you post them?

 

[Markle]

It is not constitutional and most of those should have been charged with crimes.

But we have always made our ruling class above the law and now the SCOTUS made it even more official, which will just allow them to do even more shady/illegal/immoral stuff.

And people like you think that is a good thing.

 

[westwall]

If the links are already out there why didn't you post them?

Because I don't waste my time with trolls, like you.

 

[Redfish]

Murder is a legal term, it is an unlawful killing. Based on this ruling if the POTUS orders someone killed, it is by definition not an unlawful killing...what could possibly go wrong

are you really so naive that you think the CIA has not been terminating our enemies for decades. Trump eliminated the worlds top terrorists, and that was a good thing for the world. The SC ruling does not allow a president to murder a political opponent as the libs are claiming. Nor does it allow the lawfare that we are seeing from the dems in recent times.