What will be in store with a clinton white house win

I say, let those who want to take from the rich, go and get it themselves. Step up man, you're entitled remember?. Get off your fat asses and do something to equal the playing field.

Instead, you entitled losers bitch and moan who the 'Jones,' through hard work, have a nice house, cars. and girls, yet you sit around choking your chicken all day bitching.

LOSERS

What a crock of dung

-Geaux

Let them eat cake!

:lol:
 
Sounds Awesome. the rich have too much to start with.

why do you panty waist liber/socialist fools hate the rich so much ? you had your chance to become one of the rich so why didn't you ? too stupid to make your mark ??

are you a college graduate ? if yes, where is your degree from ?

i suspect you are a 6th grade drop out who is still fliping burgers at "Greasy Joe's" burger joint after 32 years of dedicated service !! :up:
 
Even if 'Her Thighness' Clinton makes the cut, it will be an improvement over this numbskull in office now. Hell, we could put a potted plant in office that could do a better job

-Geaux
Maybe you should let what she said soak in before you put any support her way. Not trying to insult you but how would she be better than obama?

Dig it..

Thats the point. That's exactly how bad Obama is... Hillary Skankton is an improvement :lol:

-Geaux

:lol:
 
Sounds Awesome. the rich have too much to start with.

why do you panty waist liber/socialist fools hate the rich so much ? you had your chance to become one of the rich so why didn't you ? too stupid to make your mark ??

are you a college graduate ? if yes, where is your degree from ?

i suspect you are a 6th grade drop out who is still fliping burgers at "Greasy Joe's" burger joint after 32 years of dedicated service !! :up:

Guy, being rich is not a virtue.

Frankly, I've known rich people. Most of them are duller than dirt and not terribly interesting.

And they need to pay their fair share, because the country works better when they do.
 
Should Hilary win the Presidency, the first thing she would do would be distancing herself from the name of the disrespectful, cheating, philandering, lying piece of crap husband who would have served his purpose and would be ready to be ditched, and she would declare that she is President Rodham.
 
Sounds Awesome. the rich have too much to start with.

why do you panty waist liber/socialist fools hate the rich so much ? you had your chance to become one of the rich so why didn't you ? too stupid to make your mark ??

are you a college graduate ? if yes, where is your degree from ?

i suspect you are a 6th grade drop out who is still fliping burgers at "Greasy Joe's" burger joint after 32 years of dedicated service !! :up:

Guy, being rich is not a virtue.

Frankly, I've known rich people. Most of them are duller than dirt and not terribly interesting.

And they need to pay their fair share, because the country works better when they do.

There are many definitions of "boring" but one of the most obvious is that boring people repeat the same thing over and over again, and people are too bored to listen to them.

If some of the rich people stopped parroting the same nonsense time and again, and looked at and commented on things objectively, rich people like Saddam Penn, Jon Stewart, Susan Sarandon, Jane Fonda, Barbra Streisand, Rob Reiner, Oliver Stone, Spike Lee, Al Sharpton, John Kerry, etc. etc. would be taken more seriously.

BTW, give a solid number of what percentage of one's income should be paid as "FAIR" and if you believe in equality, don't fudge that number by saying that a rich should pay more because he can afford it.

Remember: FAIR.
 
Last edited:
It will be ok until she targets what you have

1385873_419882651445194_1118714426_n.jpg

Even if 'Her Thighness' Clinton makes the cut, it will be an improvement over this numbskull in office now. Hell, we could put a potted plant in office that could do a better job

-Geaux

:lol::eusa_boohoo::lol::eusa_boohoo::lol:

But that potted plant beat your 'Conservative' twice. :badgrin:

And Hillary will be a far tougher person to deal with. She knows where all the skelatons are, and will not hesitate to use them. That is President Obama's greatest weakness, trying to be reasonable with unreasonable people.
 
Interesting question. With Hillary fully occupied in D.C. or traveling as part of her duties that would leave William Jefferson alone in their big house in the burbs. So one thing in store for sure would be installing a revolving door to help accommodate the comings and goings of all the various babes.

And you can take it to the bank the junkyard dog will campaign his ass off to make sure she has to relocate.
 
It will be ok until she targets what you have

1385873_419882651445194_1118714426_n.jpg

Even if 'Her Thighness' Clinton makes the cut, it will be an improvement over this numbskull in office now. Hell, we could put a potted plant in office that could do a better job

-Geaux

:lol::eusa_boohoo::lol::eusa_boohoo::lol:

But that potted plant beat your 'Conservative' twice. :badgrin:

And Hillary will be a far tougher person to deal with. She knows where all the skelatons are, and will not hesitate to use them. That is President Obama's greatest weakness, trying to be reasonable with unreasonable people.

Oops, they don't like it when anyone injects reality into their stupid threads now.
 
Do you really want the same old career politicians in office over and over again, so they can get richer and richier at our expense.? I am tired of the clintons and all the same old politicians and i am tired of voters not making a change in washington, so we can get out livelyhoods and country back.
No more clintons for me. Or the same people in office right now. I am voting them all out
 
nice discussion, but its for nothing. Hillary will never be the DNC nominee or the president. She is a sad chapter in our history----move on.
 
It will be ok until she targets what you have

1385873_419882651445194_1118714426_n.jpg


More taxing and more spending. The goal of the progressive party is to emasculate the populace through the destruction of capitalism.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”.......Margaret Thatcher

Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis, on Saul Alinsky....:eusa_whistle: ( author of Rules for Radicals.....O's real bible )

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree under the Special Honors Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.
 
Last edited:
It will be ok until she targets what you have


More taxing and more spending. The goal of the progressive party is to emasculate the populace through the destruction of capitalism.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”.......Margaret Thatcher

Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis, on Saul Alinsky....:eusa_whistle: ( author of Rules for Radicals.....O's real bible )

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree under the Special Honors Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government since then. Some people are intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.
 
Last edited:
It will be ok until she targets what you have


More taxing and more spending. The goal of the progressive party is to emasculate the populace through the destruction of capitalism.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”.......Margaret Thatcher

Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis, on Saul Alinsky....:eusa_whistle: ( author of Rules for Radicals.....O's real bible )

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree under the Special Honors Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government to observe since then. Some people intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.

Holy shit, 1969 may have been a long time ago but she hasn't changed from what she believed in when she wrote that piece of shit paper.
 

Forum List

Back
Top