What will be in store with a clinton white house win

[LordBrownTrout]

More unemployment and debt, no growth etc.

 

[Esmeralda]

More taxing and more spending. The goal of the progressive party is to emasculate the populace through the destruction of capitalism.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”.......Margaret Thatcher

Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis, on Saul Alinsky.... ( author of Rules for Radicals.....O's real bible )

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree under the Special Honors Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government to observe since then. Some people intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.

Holy shit, 1969 may have been a long time ago but she hasn't changed from what she believed in when she wrote that piece of shit paper.

And you know this because?

 

[Ava]

It will be ok until she targets what you have

More taxing and more spending. The goal of the progressive party is to emasculate the populace through the destruction of capitalism.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”.......Margaret Thatcher

Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis, on Saul Alinsky.... ( author of Rules for Radicals.....O's real bible )

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree under the Special Honors Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government since then. Some people are intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.

It sounds as if many are: Hillarycare?

I realize liberals need to rationalize her actions and beliefs since those days. SOP.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government to observe since then. Some people intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.

Holy shit, 1969 may have been a long time ago but she hasn't changed from what she believed in when she wrote that piece of shit paper.

And you know this because?

I know this because she has not shown anything other than. unless you're blind stupid and fucked up liberal.

 

[Esmeralda]

More taxing and more spending. The goal of the progressive party is to emasculate the populace through the destruction of capitalism.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”.......Margaret Thatcher

Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis, on Saul Alinsky.... ( author of Rules for Radicals.....O's real bible )

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree under the Special Honors Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government since then. Some people are intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.

It sounds as if many are: Hillarycare?

I realize liberals need to rationalize her actions and beliefs since those days. SOP.

What it sounds like to me is that you are making a lot of assumptions without any basis, just pure speculation, including using a broad generalization to sweep all "liberals" under the same umbrella. Who is rationalizing anything? I am simply saying that assuming she believes everything she believed 43 some years ago, that her world perspective, her government perspective is the same...that's a rather ludicrous assumption. Only stupid, intellectually limited people do not progress and develop throughout life. Intelligent people continue to grow intellectually, to continually observe, learn, and reassess their ideas and perspective throughout life. That's reality, for intelligent people. Maybe you don't understand that because you have not had that experience.

 

[Redfish]

Just because she wrote her thesis on him doesn't mean she follows his philosophy. Or, if she did at that time, believe in his philosophy, it doesn't mean she does now. 1969 is a long time ago, and she has had a lot of direct experience in government since then. Some people are intellectually stuck on one idea for their entire lives, others are not.

It sounds as if many are: Hillarycare?

I realize liberals need to rationalize her actions and beliefs since those days. SOP.

What it sounds like to me is that you are making a lot of assumptions without any basis, just pure speculation, including using a broad generalization to sweep all "liberals" under the same umbrella. Who is rationalizing anything? I am simply saying that assuming she believes everything she believed 43 some years ago, that her world perspective, her government perspective is the same...that's a rather ludicrous assumption. Only stupid, intellectually limited people do not progress and develop throughout life. Intelligent people continue to grow intellectually, to continually observe, learn, and reassess their ideas and perspective throughout life. That's reality, for intelligent people. Maybe you don't understand that because you have not had that experience.

can you possibly be more out of touch with reality? Hillary is a flaming liberal, always has been, always will be.

she it typical of the ugly little smart girl that no boys showed an interest in and became a radical liberal in defense.

the rumor mill in DC during the clinton years is that she was a closet lesbian who did not care when bubba fooled around.

if she runs, all of this will come out and she will lose big time. I think even she knows that.

 

[Esmeralda]

It sounds as if many are: Hillarycare?

I realize liberals need to rationalize her actions and beliefs since those days. SOP.

What it sounds like to me is that you are making a lot of assumptions without any basis, just pure speculation, including using a broad generalization to sweep all "liberals" under the same umbrella. Who is rationalizing anything? I am simply saying that assuming she believes everything she believed 43 some years ago, that her world perspective, her government perspective is the same...that's a rather ludicrous assumption. Only stupid, intellectually limited people do not progress and develop throughout life. Intelligent people continue to grow intellectually, to continually observe, learn, and reassess their ideas and perspective throughout life. That's reality, for intelligent people. Maybe you don't understand that because you have not had that experience.

can you possibly be more out of touch with reality? Hillary is a flaming liberal, always has been, always will be.

she it typical of the ugly little smart girl that no boys showed an interest in and became a radical liberal in defense.

the rumor mill in DC during the clinton years is that she was a closet lesbian who did not care when bubba fooled around.

if she runs, all of this will come out and she will lose big time. I think even she knows that.

Can you possibly be more out of touch with what I am responding to in this thread? I have never suggested she is not a liberal. I am responding to the assertion that she is an adherent of the philosophy of Saul Alinsky just because she wrote a thesis on him 43 years ago. Try to keep up.

Being a liberal does not mean you follow one person's treatise. It does not mean you form all your ideas in your teens and early 20's and adhere to them in all ways at all times throughout the course of your life. It does not mean there is only one way to see and understand reality. It does not mean all liberals are robots who think alike and walk, talk and function in unison. Maybe conservatives do that? I wouldn't know as I am not one. But as a liberal, I know that we are not all of one mind on everything, that we are individuals who think and act like individuals, not mass produced robots. Hillary has come a long, long way since she wrote her college thesis. She has most likely adjusted her personal world and life perspective in many ways.

As far as DC gossip and rumors? Pfftt! People anywhere, under any circumstances, who listen to rumor and gossip and believe is as truth are no better than people who read the astrology column in the newspaper every day and live their life by it. Fools. Total fools.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What it sounds like to me is that you are making a lot of assumptions without any basis, just pure speculation, including using a broad generalization to sweep all "liberals" under the same umbrella. Who is rationalizing anything? I am simply saying that assuming she believes everything she believed 43 some years ago, that her world perspective, her government perspective is the same...that's a rather ludicrous assumption. Only stupid, intellectually limited people do not progress and develop throughout life. Intelligent people continue to grow intellectually, to continually observe, learn, and reassess their ideas and perspective throughout life. That's reality, for intelligent people. Maybe you don't understand that because you have not had that experience.

can you possibly be more out of touch with reality? Hillary is a flaming liberal, always has been, always will be.

she it typical of the ugly little smart girl that no boys showed an interest in and became a radical liberal in defense.

the rumor mill in DC during the clinton years is that she was a closet lesbian who did not care when bubba fooled around.

if she runs, all of this will come out and she will lose big time. I think even she knows that.

Can you possibly be more out of touch with what I am responding to in this thread? I have never suggested she is not a liberal. I am responding to the assertion that she is an adherent of the philosophy of Saul Alinsky just because she wrote a thesis on him 43 years ago. Try to keep up.

Being a liberal does not mean you follow one person's treatise. It does not mean you form all your ideas in your teens and early 20's and adhere to them in all ways at all times throughout the course of your life. It does not mean there is only one way to see and understand reality. It does not mean all liberals are robots who think alike and walk, talk and function in unison. Maybe conservatives do that? I wouldn't know as I am not one. But as a liberal, I know that we are not all of one mind on everything, that we are individuals who think and act like individuals, not mass produced robots. Hillary has come a long, long way since she wrote her college thesis. She has most likely adjusted her personal world and life perspective in many ways.

As far as DC gossip and rumors? Pfftt! People anywhere, under any circumstances, who listen to rumor and gossip and believe is as truth are no better than people who read the astrology column in the newspaper every day and live their life by it. Fools. Total fools.

horse shit stop defending the bitch. She like obama got their ideology and views from that piece of shit.

 

[Esmeralda]

can you possibly be more out of touch with reality? Hillary is a flaming liberal, always has been, always will be.

she it typical of the ugly little smart girl that no boys showed an interest in and became a radical liberal in defense.

the rumor mill in DC during the clinton years is that she was a closet lesbian who did not care when bubba fooled around.

if she runs, all of this will come out and she will lose big time. I think even she knows that.

Can you possibly be more out of touch with what I am responding to in this thread? I have never suggested she is not a liberal. I am responding to the assertion that she is an adherent of the philosophy of Saul Alinsky just because she wrote a thesis on him 43 years ago. Try to keep up.

Being a liberal does not mean you follow one person's treatise. It does not mean you form all your ideas in your teens and early 20's and adhere to them in all ways at all times throughout the course of your life. It does not mean there is only one way to see and understand reality. It does not mean all liberals are robots who think alike and walk, talk and function in unison. Maybe conservatives do that? I wouldn't know as I am not one. But as a liberal, I know that we are not all of one mind on everything, that we are individuals who think and act like individuals, not mass produced robots. Hillary has come a long, long way since she wrote her college thesis. She has most likely adjusted her personal world and life perspective in many ways.

As far as DC gossip and rumors? Pfftt! People anywhere, under any circumstances, who listen to rumor and gossip and believe is as truth are no better than people who read the astrology column in the newspaper every day and live their life by it. Fools. Total fools.

horse shit stop defending the bitch. She like obama got their ideology and views from that piece of shit.

It is so nice to try to discuss anything with people who have the intellectual capacity of a ground squirrel.

 

[J.E.D]

What will be in store with a clinton white house win

Your head exploding?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Can you possibly be more out of touch with what I am responding to in this thread? I have never suggested she is not a liberal. I am responding to the assertion that she is an adherent of the philosophy of Saul Alinsky just because she wrote a thesis on him 43 years ago. Try to keep up.

Being a liberal does not mean you follow one person's treatise. It does not mean you form all your ideas in your teens and early 20's and adhere to them in all ways at all times throughout the course of your life. It does not mean there is only one way to see and understand reality. It does not mean all liberals are robots who think alike and walk, talk and function in unison. Maybe conservatives do that? I wouldn't know as I am not one. But as a liberal, I know that we are not all of one mind on everything, that we are individuals who think and act like individuals, not mass produced robots. Hillary has come a long, long way since she wrote her college thesis. She has most likely adjusted her personal world and life perspective in many ways.

As far as DC gossip and rumors? Pfftt! People anywhere, under any circumstances, who listen to rumor and gossip and believe is as truth are no better than people who read the astrology column in the newspaper every day and live their life by it. Fools. Total fools.

horse shit stop defending the bitch. She like obama got their ideology and views from that piece of shit.

It is so nice to try to discuss anything with people who have the intellectual capacity of a ground squirrel.

project much rocky? her quote from the op shows shes a alinskite. fucking stupid nut store'er

 

[bigrebnc1775]

this is what will be in store if she wins

 

[Esmeralda]

horse shit stop defending the bitch. She like obama got their ideology and views from that piece of shit.

It is so nice to try to discuss anything with people who have the intellectual capacity of a ground squirrel.

project much rocky? her quote from the op shows shes a alinskite. fucking stupid nut store'er

Oh yeah, the reason you were on ignore in the first place: you are useless.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It is so nice to try to discuss anything with people who have the intellectual capacity of a ground squirrel.

project much rocky? her quote from the op shows shes a alinskite. fucking stupid nut store'er

Oh yeah, the reason you were on ignore in the first place: you are useless.

on ignore? oh well I guess the truth hurts your rotten pussy.

 

[Redfish]

What it sounds like to me is that you are making a lot of assumptions without any basis, just pure speculation, including using a broad generalization to sweep all "liberals" under the same umbrella. Who is rationalizing anything? I am simply saying that assuming she believes everything she believed 43 some years ago, that her world perspective, her government perspective is the same...that's a rather ludicrous assumption. Only stupid, intellectually limited people do not progress and develop throughout life. Intelligent people continue to grow intellectually, to continually observe, learn, and reassess their ideas and perspective throughout life. That's reality, for intelligent people. Maybe you don't understand that because you have not had that experience.

can you possibly be more out of touch with reality? Hillary is a flaming liberal, always has been, always will be.

she it typical of the ugly little smart girl that no boys showed an interest in and became a radical liberal in defense.

the rumor mill in DC during the clinton years is that she was a closet lesbian who did not care when bubba fooled around.

if she runs, all of this will come out and she will lose big time. I think even she knows that.

Can you possibly be more out of touch with what I am responding to in this thread? I have never suggested she is not a liberal. I am responding to the assertion that she is an adherent of the philosophy of Saul Alinsky just because she wrote a thesis on him 43 years ago. Try to keep up.

Being a liberal does not mean you follow one person's treatise. It does not mean you form all your ideas in your teens and early 20's and adhere to them in all ways at all times throughout the course of your life. It does not mean there is only one way to see and understand reality. It does not mean all liberals are robots who think alike and walk, talk and function in unison. Maybe conservatives do that? I wouldn't know as I am not one. But as a liberal, I know that we are not all of one mind on everything, that we are individuals who think and act like individuals, not mass produced robots. Hillary has come a long, long way since she wrote her college thesis. She has most likely adjusted her personal world and life perspective in many ways.

As far as DC gossip and rumors? Pfftt! People anywhere, under any circumstances, who listen to rumor and gossip and believe is as truth are no better than people who read the astrology column in the newspaper every day and live their life by it. Fools. Total fools.

She has not changed, she is as much an alinsky radical liberal today as she was in college.

but: she screams "what difference does it make?"

there are so many clips of her looking stupid and saying stupid things the ad makers for the RNC would have a field day with a Hillary campaign.

"ah ain't no ways tarred"

 

[Jackson]

Interesting question. With Hillary fully occupied in D.C. or traveling as part of her duties that would leave William Jefferson alone in their big house in the burbs. So one thing in store for sure would be installing a revolving door to help accommodate the comings and goings of all the various babes.

And you can take it to the bank the junkyard dog will campaign his ass off to make sure she has to relocate.

She doesn't care as long as he keeps it out of the newspapers and other media.

 

[NLT]

Yawn, guy, making the rich pay their fair share has nothing to do with me, man.

Most of us are already paying more than our fair share.

Bbbbbut you're getting Obabblecare!!!

No, I have the same insurance I had before ObamaCare, guy.

So do most people.

Yep I have the same insurance I had before obama care and now it has doubled in price starting Jan 1.

 

[JoeB131]

why do you panty waist liber/socialist fools hate the rich so much ? you had your chance to become one of the rich so why didn't you ? too stupid to make your mark ??

are you a college graduate ? if yes, where is your degree from ?

i suspect you are a 6th grade drop out who is still fliping burgers at "Greasy Joe's" burger joint after 32 years of dedicated service !!

Guy, being rich is not a virtue.

Frankly, I've known rich people. Most of them are duller than dirt and not terribly interesting.

And they need to pay their fair share, because the country works better when they do.

There are many definitions of "boring" but one of the most obvious is that boring people repeat the same thing over and over again, and people are too bored to listen to them.

If some of the rich people stopped parroting the same nonsense time and again, and looked at and commented on things objectively, rich people like Saddam Penn, Jon Stewart, Susan Sarandon, Jane Fonda, Barbra Streisand, Rob Reiner, Oliver Stone, Spike Lee, Al Sharpton, John Kerry, etc. etc. would be taken more seriously.

BTW, give a solid number of what percentage of one's income should be paid as "FAIR" and if you believe in equality, don't fudge that number by saying that a rich should pay more because he can afford it.

Remember: FAIR.

Fair- what we had before Reagan.

That was completely fair.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Guy, being rich is not a virtue.

Frankly, I've known rich people. Most of them are duller than dirt and not terribly interesting.

And they need to pay their fair share, because the country works better when they do.

There are many definitions of "boring" but one of the most obvious is that boring people repeat the same thing over and over again, and people are too bored to listen to them.

If some of the rich people stopped parroting the same nonsense time and again, and looked at and commented on things objectively, rich people like Saddam Penn, Jon Stewart, Susan Sarandon, Jane Fonda, Barbra Streisand, Rob Reiner, Oliver Stone, Spike Lee, Al Sharpton, John Kerry, etc. etc. would be taken more seriously.

BTW, give a solid number of what percentage of one's income should be paid as "FAIR" and if you believe in equality, don't fudge that number by saying that a rich should pay more because he can afford it.

Remember: FAIR.

Fair- what we had before Reagan.

That was completely fair.

facts and history have shown carter to be just a little bit better than obama and Carter was at one time considered to be the bottom five worst presidents. But of course you are drawn to failure because you are failure.

 

[The T]

It will be ok until she targets what you have

How many more Vince Fosters will be strewn across the land if those criminals occupy the Whitehouse again? The woman is evil.