Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Mrs. Clinton wins it will show to me that America truly has hit rock bottom.
She has no success in her life that is her own.
She is going to be 68.
Her only business experience is Whitewater and making a large sum of money in the stock market.
If she wins it proves without a doubt that people only vote party and the welfare state is here to stay and grow consuming the entire country and destroying it.
If Mrs. Clinton wins it will show to me that America truly has hit rock bottom.
She has no success in her life that is her own.
She is going to be 68.
Her only business experience is Whitewater and making a large sum of money in the stock market.
If she wins it proves without a doubt that people only vote party and the welfare state is here to stay and grow consuming the entire country and destroying it.
If my choice is Clinton or Cruz, I will sit out the next Presidential election (for the first time since 1972). I will not continue to participate in a rigged game.
I want a populist on a ticket. Any ticket that has a candidate that supports the working man and woman will get my vote. Won't happen in my lifetime though.
Is English not your first language?
Here, let me translate that into redneck for you.
"Gosh darn, Cleetus, them there rich folks should pay 70% if they are just the idle rich and ain't be doing nothing with that money, anyway. If they be putting people to work, they only pay 45%. Weeee-haaa."
Response back, "Gosh darn it bubba you gots three possums I only gots me one. You need to give me one o yourin."
If Mrs. Clinton wins it will show to me that America truly has hit rock bottom.
She has no success in her life that is her own.
She is going to be 68.
Her only business experience is Whitewater and making a large sum of money in the stock market.
If she wins it proves without a doubt that people only vote party and the welfare state is here to stay and grow consuming the entire country and destroying it.
If my choice is Clinton or Cruz, I will sit out the next Presidential election (for the first time since 1972). I will not continue to participate in a rigged game.
I want a populist on a ticket. Any ticket that has a candidate that supports the working man and woman will get my vote. Won't happen in my lifetime though.
[
Were you alive back then? No one wanted a weak president because Nixon was driven out of office by something that today if Obama did people would be laughed at for even bring up the subject.
What the truth is Carter was weak because he was weak. Carter won because he seemed to be kind, caring and a good man. Turned out his presidency was a disaster and America elected the strongest President in my life time.
[
The freaking Reagan debt that the left keeps harping about ushered in the greatest peace time expansion of the economy in history. At least we got something for the very little debt, by today's standard, then we did with Obama's massive stimulus that did nothing but stimulate the debt. For all his flaws Reagan never, NEVER, let there be a doubt what country he loved, very unlike Carter or what we have today.
the real truth is Clinton screwed the working man like no one before or after. The results of the free trade agreements that only he could get passed was predicted. The prediction has come true. I always vote Clinton as the worse president in my lifetime.
If Mrs. Clinton wins it will show to me that America truly has hit rock bottom.
She has no success in her life that is her own.
She is going to be 68.
Her only business experience is Whitewater and making a large sum of money in the stock market.
If she wins it proves without a doubt that people only vote party and the welfare state is here to stay and grow consuming the entire country and destroying it.
I'm still waiting for Joe to come back and answer my question.
He stated that the 'rich' should be taxed at 70% but then said by using their money 'constructively', they could drive it down to 48%. Then in another thread he calls the previous mentioned ' constructive' reduction of tax liability as a 'loophole' that needs stopped. LMAO
Which is it?
-Geaux
Is English not your first language?
Here, let me translate that into redneck for you.
"Gosh darn, Cleetus, them there rich folks should pay 70% if they are just the idle rich and ain't be doing nothing with that money, anyway. If they be putting people to work, they only pay 45%. Weeee-haaa."
Response back, "Gosh darn it bubba you gots three possums I only gots me one. You need to give me one o yourin."
That reminds me:
Two guys go hunting for ducks. At the end of the day both bagged a certain number. The smarter one said: "Give me one of yours, so I will have twice as many as you". The one who was not smart enough to bag as many ducks as the other guy, said: "NO, you give me one of yours, so I could have just as many as you".
How many ducks did each shot? Which one is conservative and which one is liberal?
If Mrs. Clinton wins it will show to me that America truly has hit rock bottom.
She has no success in her life that is her own.
She is going to be 68.
Her only business experience is Whitewater and making a large sum of money in the stock market.
If she wins it proves without a doubt that people only vote party and the welfare state is here to stay and grow consuming the entire country and destroying it.
What "success" did Baby Bush have that was all his own?
All he had were a bunch of failed business ventures where his Daddy's friends bailed him out.
[
Who gives a shit about what percentage of taxes someone pays when they are paying millions in taxes to be wasted? Poor people don't invest in jobs rich people do. FUCK YOU if you can't comprehend that.
If Mrs. Clinton wins it will show to me that America truly has hit rock bottom.
She has no success in her life that is her own.
She is going to be 68.
Her only business experience is Whitewater and making a large sum of money in the stock market.
If she wins it proves without a doubt that people only vote party and the welfare state is here to stay and grow consuming the entire country and destroying it.
If my choice is Clinton or Cruz, I will sit out the next Presidential election (for the first time since 1972). I will not continue to participate in a rigged game.
I want a populist on a ticket. Any ticket that has a candidate that supports the working man and woman will get my vote. Won't happen in my lifetime though.
[
Bush, regardless of the liberal spin, became rich in baseball.
He then was governor of a state he actually lived in.
But as usual when the truth hurts liberals resort to trying to tear someone else down.
Hillary has done nothing as Obama had done nothing and the country has suffered because of Obama's lack of inexperience. As is the country suffering because of Mrs. Clinton's and Mr. Clinton's actions.
[
Were you alive back then? No one wanted a weak president because Nixon was driven out of office by something that today if Obama did people would be laughed at for even bring up the subject.
What the truth is Carter was weak because he was weak. Carter won because he seemed to be kind, caring and a good man. Turned out his presidency was a disaster and America elected the strongest President in my life time.
No, Carter just got the blame for America not being prepared for the rest of the world getting caught up with us again. The country was in the doldrums before Carter got there. Obviously, you don't remember Dummy Ford and his "WIN" buttons. We had a crook followed by a retard, and Americans just wanted a decent guy who wasn't capable of cleaning up the mess.
[
The freaking Reagan debt that the left keeps harping about ushered in the greatest peace time expansion of the economy in history. At least we got something for the very little debt, by today's standard, then we did with Obama's massive stimulus that did nothing but stimulate the debt. For all his flaws Reagan never, NEVER, let there be a doubt what country he loved, very unlike Carter or what we have today.
It wasn't very little debt. The DEBT TRIPLED!!!! But the real reason why we got out of the recession of 1981 was not because Reagan put us into debt giving tax giveaways to rich douchebags (which even he realized was a mistake). It got out because he spent massive amounts of money on weapons we really didn't need. We have never gotten out of a recession without massive influxes of government spending. The reason why this one has lasted so long is because the Stimulus was so weak.
the real truth is Clinton screwed the working man like no one before or after. The results of the free trade agreements that only he could get passed was predicted. The prediction has come true. I always vote Clinton as the worse president in my lifetime.
Of course you would. And you probably think Bush was awesome with his 9% unemployment and 11 Trillion in debt.
[
Truth, what happened during Carter, as I have said before, was mostly beyond his control. But he handled it badly. His malaise speech summed up his presidency. During Nixon the economy was in trouble thus price controls and such. Ford didn't do much better but he was dealt a poor hand.
Debt is realive. A person may have a 1000 dollars in debt yet take a 100000 dollar loan to buy a house. Doesn't really matter that they increased their debt 10 times what matters is if they can afford the increase. As was witnessed Reagan increasing the debt produced an expansion in the economy which in my opinion was well worth the cost. Obama's MASSIVE increase in the debt in reality produced nothing measurable except the MASSIVE debt placed on our children.
Bottom line, Reagan made us proud again, Obama does not.
Response back, "Gosh darn it bubba you gots three possums I only gots me one. You need to give me one o yourin."
That reminds me:
Two guys go hunting for ducks. At the end of the day both bagged a certain number. The smarter one said: "Give me one of yours, so I will have twice as many as you". The one who was not smart enough to bag as many ducks as the other guy, said: "NO, you give me one of yours, so I could have just as many as you".
How many ducks did each shot? Which one is conservative and which one is liberal?
I'll guess 5 and 7 but as to the conservative part, I will say neither.
[
Truth, what happened during Carter, as I have said before, was mostly beyond his control. But he handled it badly. His malaise speech summed up his presidency. During Nixon the economy was in trouble thus price controls and such. Ford didn't do much better but he was dealt a poor hand.
Debt is realive. A person may have a 1000 dollars in debt yet take a 100000 dollar loan to buy a house. Doesn't really matter that they increased their debt 10 times what matters is if they can afford the increase. As was witnessed Reagan increasing the debt produced an expansion in the economy which in my opinion was well worth the cost. Obama's MASSIVE increase in the debt in reality produced nothing measurable except the MASSIVE debt placed on our children.
Bottom line, Reagan made us proud again, Obama does not.
No, not really.
First, Reagan's "growth" of the economy wasn't all that much to brag about. The Middle Class lost ground, the rich got richer until they crashed the economy again in 1990. This was NOT a good thing.
But the real bad thing about Reagan's growth of the debt was that he instituted an attitude that persists to this day that borrowing with no intent to pay it back is okay.
In the past, you had a war or a recession, you raised taxes on the wealthy and after the crisis was over, you kept paying it down. That's what responsible people do.
Reagan's attitude was that it was okay to have debt as far as the eye could see because we wo uld "Grow" our way out of it. WHich never happened.
That reminds me:
Two guys go hunting for ducks. At the end of the day both bagged a certain number. The smarter one said: "Give me one of yours, so I will have twice as many as you". The one who was not smart enough to bag as many ducks as the other guy, said: "NO, you give me one of yours, so I could have just as many as you".
How many ducks did each shot? Which one is conservative and which one is liberal?
I'll guess 5 and 7 but as to the conservative part, I will say neither.
Congrats on getting the arithmetic correctly. But the fact that one got more than the other and the one who got less wanted part of it might give you a clue about their political leanings.
[
Bush, regardless of the liberal spin, became rich in baseball.
He then was governor of a state he actually lived in.
But as usual when the truth hurts liberals resort to trying to tear someone else down.
Hillary has done nothing as Obama had done nothing and the country has suffered because of Obama's lack of inexperience. As is the country suffering because of Mrs. Clinton's and Mr. Clinton's actions.
Not because of anything HE did. A bunch of investors used him as a spokesman and then didn't let him make any of the decisions.
It was also on his watch that all the players were doping up on Roids...
And he was kind of a disaster as Governor.
Did bother to read your word cloud...
Reagan took 900 Billion in Debt and tripled it into 3 TRILLION in debt. In short, a 200% increase.
Obama was stuck with 11 Trillion in debt, a busted economy, two ongoing wars and a Congress that refused to allow raising of taxes... and he increased the debt by 5 trillion, or about a 50% increase.
Would you rather have a 50% increase in your debt or a 200% increase in your debt?
More to the point, Reagan instituted the notion that the rich don't need to pay their fair share because they are somehow better than the rest of us. They used to talk about "Trickle down" and "Laffer Curves", but when that shit never happened, they started talking shit about "Freedom" and "The Consitution"....
