Redfish
Diamond Member
- Jan 29, 2013
- 48,337
- 10,767
What about food and drug safety? Would you be satisfied if, for instance, meat inspections in Arkansas or Illinois are done with the same rigor they would be in every other state?Yes, I agree.
How about the Atomic Energy Commission? Is that another bloated federal agency that is way too intrusive? We saw what happened after we deregulated the banking system. How are those Savings & Loan shares doing? And after we deregulated the airlines, I suppose it's tougher to book a flight on TWA or Eastern or Pan Am. So what could possibly go wrong with other industries undergoing deregulation?
Some economic activities thrive under regulation. Regulation does not mean repression. Instead regulation creates a level playing field.
I'm not convinced that Tea Party types have thought their agenda through any deeper than slogan on a bumper sticker.
The problem that you and RW and others on the left have is that you do not understand the tea party agenda.
Smaller less intrusive federal govt does not mean no federal govt
individual freedom does not mean ignore the sick, old, and helpless
Sane fiscal control does not mean cancelling needed programs
lower taxes does not mean no taxes
states rights does not mean no federal laws
Was the country better off when there were thousands of local banks or as now when there are only a few huge mega banks?
was the country better off when there were dozens of airlines or as now when there are a few huge ones?
Competition works, liberalism kills competition.
Freedom works, marxist collectivism does not.