What Would Reagan Do?

[Pogo]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.

And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.

Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:
I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

The "socialist" tag --- a new and trendy buzzword at the time --- was already there when Hitler joined the party around 1920. He objected to it but went along.

Do you believe Grape Nuts is made with any grapes or nuts at all?
Or that the Pennsylvania Dutch have something to do with Holland?
Pop quiz -- how many band members comprise Ten Thousand Maniacs?

DUH.

In any case all that shit I just mentioned --- class hierarchies, übernationalism, übermilitarism, appeal to past glories, denigration of minorities/immigrants/women/homosexuals/communists/intellectuals -- those don't live on the left, as even retards know.

And my name is not "Holmes". Quit looking at my dick.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Hitler killed all the socialist, just as our libertarians would do if they could take power.

 

[kaz]

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

The "socialist" tag --- a new and trendy buzzword at the time --- was already there when Hitler joined the party around 1920. He objected to it but went along.

Do you believe Grape Nuts is made with any grapes or nuts at all?
Or that the Pennsylvania Dutch have something to do with Holland?
Pop quiz -- how many band members comprise Ten Thousand Maniacs?

DUH.

In any case all that shit I just mentioned --- class hierarchies, übernationalism, übermilitarism, appeal to past glories, denigration of minorities/immigrants/women/homosexuals/communists/intellectuals -- those don't live on the left, as even retards know.

And my name is not "Holmes". Quit looking at my dick.

Um...you seem to have the obsession with staring at your dick, Holmes.

As for Hitler, he called him self a socialist, he believed in government control over the economy. That confuses you how, exactly?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.

And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.

Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:
I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

 

[Pogo]

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.


You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

The "socialist" tag --- a new and trendy buzzword at the time --- was already there when Hitler joined the party around 1920. He objected to it but went along.

Do you believe Grape Nuts is made with any grapes or nuts at all?
Or that the Pennsylvania Dutch have something to do with Holland?
Pop quiz -- how many band members comprise Ten Thousand Maniacs?

DUH.

In any case all that shit I just mentioned --- class hierarchies, übernationalism, übermilitarism, appeal to past glories, denigration of minorities/immigrants/women/homosexuals/communists/intellectuals -- those don't live on the left, as even retards know.

And my name is not "Holmes". Quit looking at my dick.

Um...you seem to have the obsession with staring at your dick, Holmes.

As for Hitler, he called him self a socialist, he believed in government control over the economy. That confuses you how, exactly?

So you cannot refute my observations on any ofthose characteristics. That's OK Tiny --- no one can do that. It's how bullshit works.

Speaking of which, you don't seem to understand your own terms --

>> Socialism is a social and economic system characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.[8] "Social ownership" may refer to public ownership, cooperative ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.[9] << (Wiki)
​

Remind us again how the NSDAP --- or Grape Nuts, or the Pennsylvania Dutch, or Greenland, or catgut or lead pencils ---- were all about "democratic control" there, Sparkles.

Think it through next time. If you need help, look no farther than the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

 

[Pogo]

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Sadly they think of it like spaghetti -- that if they keep throwing it against the wall, sooner or later it's gotta stick.

I compared the NSDAP to the KKK earlier. It's virtually an exact match. How long before some Revisionista tries to tell us the Klan are a bunch of "leftists".....

 

[kaz]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

I'm curious, what part of government not burping and feeding you specifically do you want that my not wanting that makes me "stupid, credulous and cowardly" exactly? Be specific, what positions?

 

[kaz]

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Socialism is government control over the economy, central economic planning. Fascism is government control over the economy, central planning. Clayton, how are those the same? Duh, dar, I don't get it...

 

[kaz]

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

The "socialist" tag --- a new and trendy buzzword at the time --- was already there when Hitler joined the party around 1920. He objected to it but went along.

Do you believe Grape Nuts is made with any grapes or nuts at all?
Or that the Pennsylvania Dutch have something to do with Holland?
Pop quiz -- how many band members comprise Ten Thousand Maniacs?

DUH.

In any case all that shit I just mentioned --- class hierarchies, übernationalism, übermilitarism, appeal to past glories, denigration of minorities/immigrants/women/homosexuals/communists/intellectuals -- those don't live on the left, as even retards know.

And my name is not "Holmes". Quit looking at my dick.

Um...you seem to have the obsession with staring at your dick, Holmes.

As for Hitler, he called him self a socialist, he believed in government control over the economy. That confuses you how, exactly?

So you cannot refute my observations on any ofthose characteristics. That's OK Tiny --- no one can do that. It's how bullshit works.

Speaking of which, you don't seem to understand your own terms --

>> Socialism is a social and economic system characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.[8] "Social ownership" may refer to public ownership, cooperative ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.[9] << (Wiki)
​

Remind us again how the NSDAP --- or Grape Nuts, or the Pennsylvania Dutch, or Greenland, or catgut or lead pencils ---- were all about "democratic control" there, Sparkles.

Think it through next time. If you need help, look no farther than the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Can you stop staring at your own dick and translate your post from gibberish to English for me?

 

[BULLDOG]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them. " --- Barry Goldwater quoted by John Dean, "Conservatives Without Conscience"

Too late. They have had control of the repub party for a while. That's why things are so screwed up.

 

[kaz]

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.


You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Sadly they think of it like spaghetti -- that if they keep throwing it against the wall, sooner or later it's gotta stick.

I compared the NSDAP to the KKK earlier. It's virtually an exact match. How long before some Revisionista tries to tell us the Klan are a bunch of "leftists".....

False comparison, my point was on economics, Holmes. Try to keep up

 

[kaz]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them. " --- Barry Goldwater quoted by John Dean, "Conservatives Without Conscience"

Too late. They have had control of the repub party for a while. That's why things are so screwed up.

Preachers control the Republican party? Yet the Republican party is virtually indistinguishable from the Democrat party. Or is the Democrat party controlled by preachers too? You people are hysterical

 

[BULLDOG]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them. " --- Barry Goldwater quoted by John Dean, "Conservatives Without Conscience"

Too late. They have had control of the repub party for a while. That's why things are so screwed up.

Preachers control the Republican party? Yet the Republican party is virtually indistinguishable from the Democrat party. Or is the Democrat party controlled by preachers too? You people are hysterical

Do you ever get tired of listening to your own crap?

 

[kaz]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them. " --- Barry Goldwater quoted by John Dean, "Conservatives Without Conscience"

Too late. They have had control of the repub party for a while. That's why things are so screwed up.

Preachers control the Republican party? Yet the Republican party is virtually indistinguishable from the Democrat party. Or is the Democrat party controlled by preachers too? You people are hysterical

Do you ever get tired of listening to your own crap?

Right, like when I made the idiotic statement that "preachers" control the Republican party. Wait, that was you...

You're a bigot, you make ridiculous sweeping statements about your political opponents while holding your own party who are in the end just like them faultless. Then you make it sound like you think you're mentally balanced and you oppose extremism. You're a kool-aid chugger, cowboy.

Here's the 411. The parties are both dominated by self centered politicos who make living off other people's money a career choice. Grow up

 

[Pogo]

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.


You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Socialism is government control over the economy, central economic planning. Fascism is government control over the economy, central planning. Clayton, how are those the same? Duh, dar, I don't get it...

And false equivalence is presenting a bullshit definition as a premise and then going "oh look -- it's the same as this other thing".

No wonder you can't figure out your own gender.

 

[kaz]

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Socialism is government control over the economy, central economic planning. Fascism is government control over the economy, central planning. Clayton, how are those the same? Duh, dar, I don't get it...

And false equivalence is presenting a bullshit definition as a premise and then going "oh look -- it's the same as this other thing".

No wonder you can't figure out your own gender.

Great point, not.

They called themselves socialists, I pointed out their policies were socialist, you are the one denying it, Holmes.

As for gender, your obsession with staring at your own penis is multidimensional sexual confusion. As for me, you know what I am, and you can always ask. Just to save a question though, either way, I'm not interested...

 

[Meathead]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I knew quite a few Iranians in southern Calfornia back in the 80s. They were all middle class, anti-Khomenei and well-vetted by immigration services. We had the Shah's intelligence confirming who those people were. Reagan was not an idiot and would not have let anyone in without certitude of identification.

Obama, on the other hand, is a myopic moron who believes that his self-righteousness will be vindicated.

 

[Zander]

Nobody knows what Reagan would do if faced with this situation.

But please do have fun jerking yourselves off....

 

[Pogo]

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Socialism is government control over the economy, central economic planning. Fascism is government control over the economy, central planning. Clayton, how are those the same? Duh, dar, I don't get it...

And false equivalence is presenting a bullshit definition as a premise and then going "oh look -- it's the same as this other thing".

No wonder you can't figure out your own gender.

Great point, not.

They called themselves socialists, I pointed out their policies were socialist, you are the one denying it, Holmes.

As for gender, your obsession with staring at your own penis is multidimensional sexual confusion. As for me, you know what I am, and you can always ask. Just to save a question though, either way, I'm not interested...

And again -- you're so simplistic that you think "lead pencils" have lead in them? That catgut is made from cats? That Grape Nuts contain either? That the Democratic Republic of Congo and the People's Democratic Republic of Korea are what they say they are?

You seem to put a lot of veracity in Nazi propaganda. Why would that be exactly? Is it just simpletonistic gullibility? Or are you just that stupid?

Bottom line remains -- the NSDAP was never, and will never be, "socialist" or "leftist", no matter how many times you run panting to an internet message board and try to tell the same lie over and over until you find some equally gullible victim to believe it. Can't be done.

 

[kaz]

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you

This is a remarkable example of ignorance and stupidity.

National Socialism was fascism, fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

It advocated for militarism, was hostile to change and diversity, it was authoritarian, and sought to compel conformity through force of law – very similar to modern American conservatives.

This is not to say that today's American conservatives are 'Nazis' or 'fascists,' that would fail as a false comparison fallacy; but it does illustrate the ignorance and stupidity of perceiving National Socialism as 'the left' or having anything to do with 'socialism.'

Socialism is government control over the economy, central economic planning. Fascism is government control over the economy, central planning. Clayton, how are those the same? Duh, dar, I don't get it...

And false equivalence is presenting a bullshit definition as a premise and then going "oh look -- it's the same as this other thing".

No wonder you can't figure out your own gender.

Great point, not.

They called themselves socialists, I pointed out their policies were socialist, you are the one denying it, Holmes.

As for gender, your obsession with staring at your own penis is multidimensional sexual confusion. As for me, you know what I am, and you can always ask. Just to save a question though, either way, I'm not interested...

And again -- you're so simplistic that you think "lead pencils" have lead in them? That catgut is made from cats? That Grape Nuts contain either? That the Democratic Republic of Congo and the People's Democratic Republic of Korea are what they say they are?

You seem to put a lot of veracity in Nazi propaganda. Why would that be exactly? Is it just simpletonistic gullibility? Or are you just that stupid?

Bottom line remains -- the NSDAP was never, and will never be, "socialist" or "leftist", no matter how many times you run panting to an internet message board and try to tell the same lie over and over until you find some equally gullible victim to believe it. Can't be done.

What about a centrally planned economy is beyond your mind numbing simpleton grasp? That's what socialism is. Mao had it, Hitler had it. Hitler knew what a socialist was, and that he was one