What Would Reagan Do?

[BluesLegend]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place. They used to babysit me sometimes.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

When I was a kid we were friends with a family who were refugees from Tehran. They were really nice people.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

The 9-11 terrorists all came here with legal visas.

 

[g5000]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

We have the means to screen refugees. We're one of the hardest countries to get into in that respect.

Our biggest weak spot isn't refugees. It's the visa waiver program we have with Western Europe.

 

[BluesLegend]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

The 9-11 terrorists all came here with legal visas.

So what, do you deny that 14 years later currently terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges and murdering innocent civilians? By the way I'm still waiting for your apology.

 

[BluesLegend]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

We have the means to screen refugees. We're one of the hardest countries to get into in that respect.

Our biggest weak spot isn't refugees. It's the visa waiver program we have with Western Europe.

Government officials say we can't screen them. Congressmen who have been briefed on this say we can't screen them. Fake Syrian passports is a thriving business. You may be willing to take the risk that terrorists will sneak into our country but a majority of Americans and governors including Dem's are not.

 

[g5000]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

We have the means to screen refugees. We're one of the hardest countries to get into in that respect.

Our biggest weak spot isn't refugees. It's the visa waiver program we have with Western Europe.

Government officials say we can't screen them. Congressmen who have been briefed on this say we can't screen them. Fake Syrian passports is a thriving business. You may be willing to take the risk that terrorists will sneak into our country but a majority of Americans and governors including Dem's are not.

And that's exactly why I started this topic.

Reagan had less government resources available than our government has now. He didn't have the Department of Homeland Security. He didn't have the ability to monitor every American's communications. He didn't have anything close to the surveillance police state we have now.

Yet he let Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had balls back then. And Christian compassion.

 

[BlindBoo]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

The one sneaking into Europe? The ones likely to try and come here on a visa but not likely to wait 18 months in a UN Refugee camp like the ones who are being resettled here.

 

[BluesLegend]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

We have the means to screen refugees. We're one of the hardest countries to get into in that respect.

Our biggest weak spot isn't refugees. It's the visa waiver program we have with Western Europe.

Government officials say we can't screen them. Congressmen who have been briefed on this say we can't screen them. Fake Syrian passports is a thriving business. You may be willing to take the risk that terrorists will sneak into our country but a majority of Americans and governors including Dem's are not.

And that's exactly why I started this topic.

Reagan had less government resources available than our government has now. He didn't have the Department of Homeland Security. He didn't have the ability to monitor every American's communications. He didn't have anything close to the surveillance police state we have now.

Yet he let Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had balls back then. And Christian compassion.

Your point about Reagan is altogether meaningless because Reagan never had 3,000 innocent Americans killed in a terrorist attack on US soil now did he. You don't know what Reagan would do if he were president today, given what has taken place over the last 15 years.

 

[BluesLegend]

State department issues WORLD WIDE travel warning amid ISIL TERROR THREATS, so much for this lame ass 'conservatives won't let the Syrians in' thread, duh!

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

The one sneaking into Europe? The ones likely to try and come here on a visa but not likely to wait 18 months in a UN Refugee camp like the ones who are being resettled here.

Talk to the hand our government officials say the refuges cannot be screened, until you can solve that problem the border is closed to them.

 

[g5000]

Another idiot who has confused a refugee running away from terrorists with the terrorists.

It takes a special kind of retard to do that.

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

We have the means to screen refugees. We're one of the hardest countries to get into in that respect.

Our biggest weak spot isn't refugees. It's the visa waiver program we have with Western Europe.

Government officials say we can't screen them. Congressmen who have been briefed on this say we can't screen them. Fake Syrian passports is a thriving business. You may be willing to take the risk that terrorists will sneak into our country but a majority of Americans and governors including Dem's are not.

And that's exactly why I started this topic.

Reagan had less government resources available than our government has now. He didn't have the Department of Homeland Security. He didn't have the ability to monitor every American's communications. He didn't have anything close to the surveillance police state we have now.

Yet he let Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had balls back then. And Christian compassion.

Your point about Reagan is altogether meaningless because Reagan never had 3,000 innocent Americans killed in a terrorist attack on US soil now did he. You don't know what Reagan would do if he were president today, given what has taken place over the last 15 years.

The war hysteria toward Iran was higher than the hysteria toward ISIS is today. Way higher.

Like I said in a previous post, people were walking around with NUKE IRAN T-shirts on. America wanted to go to war with Iran in a bad way, even though it could escalate into global thermonuclear war.

We were all pretty sure it was just a matter of time before we all got nuked, and that it would be sparked by conflict in the Middle East. Bible thumpers were drawing parallels between current events and the book of Revelations.

And still Reagan let the refugees in.

Face it. The modern day Republican isn't made of the same mettle as a Reagan Republican. It's just a simple fact.

The Left was the crowd which was constantly whining and fearmongering back then. They were the ones fellating Russia's leaders and dooming the US to losing the Cold War. The Left was the crowd which had no solutions. Lefties were the retards who made your skin crawl every time they opened their mouths.

It's amazing how much the Gnu Right sounds like the old school Left these days. It's just plain weird.

 

[JakeStarkey]

One method of some fascist right wing postmodernists/ apologists is to problematize what seems clear (theree were no cheering crowds in NJ on 9-11) so that some other outlandish view seems more plausible than it normally would.

 

[BluesLegend]

Hey dummy they terrorists are sneaking in with the refuges, or is that too complicated for your pea brain.

We have the means to screen refugees. We're one of the hardest countries to get into in that respect.

Our biggest weak spot isn't refugees. It's the visa waiver program we have with Western Europe.

Government officials say we can't screen them. Congressmen who have been briefed on this say we can't screen them. Fake Syrian passports is a thriving business. You may be willing to take the risk that terrorists will sneak into our country but a majority of Americans and governors including Dem's are not.

And that's exactly why I started this topic.

Reagan had less government resources available than our government has now. He didn't have the Department of Homeland Security. He didn't have the ability to monitor every American's communications. He didn't have anything close to the surveillance police state we have now.

Yet he let Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had balls back then. And Christian compassion.

Your point about Reagan is altogether meaningless because Reagan never had 3,000 innocent Americans killed in a terrorist attack on US soil now did he. You don't know what Reagan would do if he were president today, given what has taken place over the last 15 years.

The war hysteria toward Iran was higher than the hysteria toward ISIS is today. Way higher.

Like I said in a previous post, people were walking around with NUKE IRAN T-shirts on. America wanted to go to war with Iran in a bad way, even though it could escalate into global thermonuclear war.

We were all pretty sure it was just a matter of time before we all got nuked, and that it would be sparked by conflict in the Middle East. Bible thumpers were drawing parallels between current events and the book of Revelations.

And still Reagan let the refugees in.

Face it. The modern day Republican isn't made of the same mettle as a Reagan Republican. It's just a simple fact.

The Left was the crowd which was constantly whining and fearmongering back then. They were the ones fellating Russia's leaders and dooming the US to losing the Cold War. The Left was the crowd which had no solutions. Lefties were the retards who made your skin crawl every time they opened their mouths.

It's amazing how much the Gnu Right sounds like the old school Left these days. It's just plain weird.

That you refuse to acknowledge the world trade center attacks might have transformed Reagan's position on refuges tells me your thread is nothing but leftist spin.

 

[Siete]

So now Reagan is a hero? Make up your minds and stop using people to suit an agenda. If Reagan were POTUS he'd be taking it to ISIS....your boy is pissing down his hind leg over it

Reagan had a chance to take it to Iran after they killed 220 marines in Lebanon.. but he didn't ... so as usual, you're full of shit. Giving refuge to people who needed it was the American thing to do, and he did it without tattooing numbers on their wrists like Nazi-Trump and his goosestepping followers want to do.

 

[kaz]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.






And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.





Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

 

[Pogo]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.

And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.

Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

 

[Siete]

anything short of a brain dead, mouth breathing idiot is far left in knuckle dragging RW'r world.

 

[Pogo]

anything short of a brain dead, mouth breathing idiot is far left in knuckle dragging RW'r world.

But remember, he/she/it is "not a Republican". Because that party's a buncha left wing radicals.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Much of Trump's base is made up of the fascist authoritarian far right. Examples are easyt, S. J., Lonestar, etc.

 

[kaz]

Remember how much we feared and hated Iranians? Iran had a revolution and took American hostages for over a year.

Iran had terrorist training camps and were sending out terrorists all over the place. Iran was behind the blowing up of the Marine barracks. Iran funded Hezbollah and Hamas which carried out terrorist attacks all over the Middle East, and particularly in Israel, a great ally of the US.

Iranians were hijacking airplanes and blowing shit up all over the place.

And then there were the Iranian refugees trying to get away from these maniacs.

Do you know what Reagan did about the refugees?

Did he shit his pants in fear? Nope.

Did he stir up the Right with anti-Muslim rhetoric and say we should not allow these refugees in? Nope.

Did he do some kind of fucked up calculus and say it wasn't worth the risk? Nope.

He let the Iranian refugees in. Because Republicans had real balls of titanium and real compassion back then.

http://www.paaia.org/CMS/Data/Sites/1/pdfs/iranian-americans---immigration-and-assimilation.pdf

Between October 1981 and February 1985, more Iranians were granted asylum — 11,055 in total — than any other nationality.

Do you see that? At the peak of our anti-Iranian sentiment, we let in more Iranian refugees than any other kind of refugees.

Now THAT is what "home of the brave" looks like, boys and girls. That is what "American exceptionalism" looks like.


Reagan's own words:

We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries. We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression.

Illegal immigrants in considerable numbers have become productive members of our society and are a basic part of our work force. Those who have established equities in the United States should be recognized and accorded legal status.

I don't know who these people are today who are calling themselves Republicans. I really don't.

I don't know why an America hating socialist calls themselves a Republican either, but you do.

To a nazi, everyone else is left wing.

I'm a Reagan Republican and people like you prove every day the modern day Republican has nothing in common with Reagan. You're stupid, credulous, and cowardly.

As to your question, I don't remember the threat Iranian terrorists were going to do things like shoot 500 people in Paris. Can you remind me what that fear was based on?

You must be a child if you don't know about Iranian state sponsored terrorism.

Nazis are socialists, they are pretty far left. Pretty much there with you.

You're a Reagan conservative, that's comic. Like how you think Republicans moved to the right, they are left of Reagan, Holmes

And again, I say I'm not a Republican, and you insult me by calling me a Republican, while you claim to be a Republican. Where is your clown avatar? The dress fits

Nazis are about as "far left" as the Klan. Fatter o' mact they have a lot in common -- hypernationalism.... hyperreligionism.... racial purity fantasies... hypermoralistic persecution of drunks and loose women... da evil Jooos..... da evil communists..... da eebil homosexuals .. da eebil intellectuals....

Yep, that's what I call "far left" awright.

Revisionism never sleeps around here. It's like rust.

The Nazis were more aware than you, Holmes, that's why they accurately called themselves a socialist party. They believed in government control over the economy. That's as leftist as you