Whatever ever happened to the little sign… ‘We have a right to refuse service’?

Not at all. In fact, if you had actually read the links I posted, you would see that I mercilessly bashed the right-wing radicals (libertarians, sovereign citizens, and anarchists).

Incidentally, you didn't even get the left's side of the political spectrum correct. Socialism is not the "extreme left". You can go much further left (and thus much worse) than socialism. You could have a Democracy where everyone is free to work where ever they chose and the people freely vote for socialism. Further left is communism/fascism where everyone is forced into socialism.

The fact remains, fascism is as left-wing as it gets while the most radical and dangerous form of right-wing extremism is anarchy. No rules, no laws, complete and total freedom - even to rape, pillage, and murder. In other words, the complete opposite of fascism (so they simply can't be on the same side of the spectrum my friend).

Oh this should be good.

How is fascism left wing exactly?

Or is this one of those "if you say it enough times it becomes true" malarkeys?
Seriously? I've explained it like 20'x already, including the post you just responded to. I'm guessing you're struggling with some sort of reading comprehension condition?

You're being polite. I call it as it is, plain stupid.
 
Interesting project I'm working on (I'm part of the team). Our board decided that we would have speakers during 2015, every other month or so.

Anyway, we have some celebrities coming out to the desert to chat up the troops and provide a day of "food, fun, and fellowship".

The reason I bring it up is that we were turned down by some celebs who have confirmed open dates on their schedule (or rather their handlers--not sure the celeb ever heard the offer). Anyway, again, we have money to pay them...cash; they have an opening in their schedule. They just aren't interested.

I say, "Good for them." Nobody should be forced to do anything just because you want their services and can pay for it. If Bill Engvall signed a deal, however, and then said, "I really want to get away from corporate events. I'm not doing it." That's wrong.

Goods are a different matter. Businesses shouldn't have the right to refuse sale based on perceptions of lifestyle. If you've shop-lifted from them before...different story. IF there is nothing except the business owner's mis-conception of what you do in your spare time...that's not enough.

Sure they should. You have failed to post a single reason why they shouldn't, other than your indignation. You see, freedom means you get to do what you want with your property, even if someone else doesn't like it.

So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.


Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town.

Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com
 
Interesting project I'm working on (I'm part of the team). Our board decided that we would have speakers during 2015, every other month or so.

Anyway, we have some celebrities coming out to the desert to chat up the troops and provide a day of "food, fun, and fellowship".

The reason I bring it up is that we were turned down by some celebs who have confirmed open dates on their schedule (or rather their handlers--not sure the celeb ever heard the offer). Anyway, again, we have money to pay them...cash; they have an opening in their schedule. They just aren't interested.

I say, "Good for them." Nobody should be forced to do anything just because you want their services and can pay for it. If Bill Engvall signed a deal, however, and then said, "I really want to get away from corporate events. I'm not doing it." That's wrong.

Goods are a different matter. Businesses shouldn't have the right to refuse sale based on perceptions of lifestyle. If you've shop-lifted from them before...different story. IF there is nothing except the business owner's mis-conception of what you do in your spare time...that's not enough.

Sure they should. You have failed to post a single reason why they shouldn't, other than your indignation. You see, freedom means you get to do what you want with your property, even if someone else doesn't like it.

So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.


Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town
.

Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com


Nice try:

Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town


Twenty miles--3 Pharmacies. Your conditions...not mine.

You're link listed pharmacies in

Merced, nearly twice the distance
Camp Hill, PA, something like 1800 miles away
Chowchilla, CA, further than Merced
etc...

Come back when you can meet your own standards...
 
Sure they should. You have failed to post a single reason why they shouldn't, other than your indignation. You see, freedom means you get to do what you want with your property, even if someone else doesn't like it.

So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.


Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town
.

Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com


Nice try:

Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town


Twenty miles--3 Pharmacies. Your conditions...not mine.

You're link listed pharmacies in

Merced, nearly twice the distance
Camp Hill, PA, something like 1800 miles away
Chowchilla, CA, further than Merced
etc...

Come back when you can meet your own standards...

Are you insane?

Pharmacy 1.

Rite Aid
4994 Joe Howard St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

Other Locations »

(209) 742-7600

Pharmacy 2

Dynamite & Drugstore
5102 Jessie St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-4141

Pharmacy 3

Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

Pharmacy 4
Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

So, that is FOUR that are RIGHT IN TOWN.

None of the pharmacies on that page were in PA, I don't even know where you came up with that at.
 
So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.


Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town
.

Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com


Nice try:

Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town


Twenty miles--3 Pharmacies. Your conditions...not mine.

You're link listed pharmacies in

Merced, nearly twice the distance
Camp Hill, PA, something like 1800 miles away
Chowchilla, CA, further than Merced
etc...

Come back when you can meet your own standards...

Are you insane?

Pharmacy 1.

Rite Aid
4994 Joe Howard St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

Other Locations »

(209) 742-7600

Pharmacy 2

Dynamite & Drugstore
5102 Jessie St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-4141

Pharmacy 3

Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

Pharmacy 4
Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

So, that is FOUR that are RIGHT IN TOWN.

None of the pharmacies on that page were in PA, I don't even know where you came up with that at.

Not quite the case...

Well, you listed Pioneer twice.

And Dynamite & Drugstore is actually a marijuana dispensary...Screenshot below.

upload_2014-10-31_22-48-22.png


upload_2014-10-31_22-48-22.png
 
Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town.

Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com


Nice try:

Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town


Twenty miles--3 Pharmacies. Your conditions...not mine.

You're link listed pharmacies in

Merced, nearly twice the distance
Camp Hill, PA, something like 1800 miles away
Chowchilla, CA, further than Merced
etc...

Come back when you can meet your own standards...

Are you insane?

Pharmacy 1.

Rite Aid
4994 Joe Howard St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

Other Locations »

(209) 742-7600

Pharmacy 2

Dynamite & Drugstore
5102 Jessie St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-4141

Pharmacy 3

Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

Pharmacy 4
Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

So, that is FOUR that are RIGHT IN TOWN.

None of the pharmacies on that page were in PA, I don't even know where you came up with that at.

Not quite the case...

Well, you listed Pioneer twice.

And Dynamite & Drugstore is actually a marijuana dispensary...Screenshot below.

View attachment 33677

View attachment 33677
Yes, I mis posted

There are two Rite AIds, a Pioneer, a Dynamite IN TOWN

Dynamite might sell medical marijuana, but that is not all they sell, notice they call themselves a DRUG store.

In either case, I produced at minimum 3, I say 4 Pharmacies, RIGHT IN TOWN.

Why you idiotic troll liberals can't just say "okay you proved me wrong on that one" is fucking beyond me.
 
When I was in USSR they taught me Hitler and Nazis ate babies, then in America they taught me that Nazis made lampshades and mattresses out of Jews, and now the Fox Newsified Americans are trying to tell me that Nazis were on the side of gays. Oh boy. no wonder you don't see me posting much any more.
The gay community and the liberals have lost their little Nazi minds. A privately owned business has the right to refuse to conduct business with anybody they want. Period. It's not even open for debate.

Further still, the 1st Amendment affords you the right to practice your religious belief. And the little liberal/gay Nazi community is working so hard to trample on that right as well.

All I can say is that I hope these companies deliver the most dreadful products and services when they are unconstitutionally forced to by the liberal Nazi's. If you're a bakery and you're forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding, I hope you put 70lbs of salt in the cake and make the frosting primarily out of vinegar so that they vomit when they eat it. Then maybe word will spread in their little gay circles that your bakery isn't any good and you can be left the hell alone to conduct your private business as you see fit.

*Note - desperate Nazi liberals will try to spin this as "homophobia" because they need to justify their anti-constitutional Nazi beliefs. However, it is not. I couldn't care less if someone is gay. What I do care about however is when they unconstitutionally force someone to do their bidding because they think being gay makes them special and entitled.

It's an agenda of reeducation



And when I was in the USSR, I saw people standing in breadlines for 10-12 hours a day. Your point is?
 
Interesting project I'm working on (I'm part of the team). Our board decided that we would have speakers during 2015, every other month or so.

Anyway, we have some celebrities coming out to the desert to chat up the troops and provide a day of "food, fun, and fellowship".

The reason I bring it up is that we were turned down by some celebs who have confirmed open dates on their schedule (or rather their handlers--not sure the celeb ever heard the offer). Anyway, again, we have money to pay them...cash; they have an opening in their schedule. They just aren't interested.

I say, "Good for them." Nobody should be forced to do anything just because you want their services and can pay for it. If Bill Engvall signed a deal, however, and then said, "I really want to get away from corporate events. I'm not doing it." That's wrong.

Goods are a different matter. Businesses shouldn't have the right to refuse sale based on perceptions of lifestyle. If you've shop-lifted from them before...different story. IF there is nothing except the business owner's mis-conception of what you do in your spare time...that's not enough.

Sure they should. You have failed to post a single reason why they shouldn't, other than your indignation. You see, freedom means you get to do what you want with your property, even if someone else doesn't like it.

So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.

You have a special talent for dreaming up scenarios that would never happen. Who would move to a town where they couldn't buy medications they needed? Even if there were such a town, how far could the nearest pharmacy be that would sell you the medication you needed?
 
I'm all for denying your services. Just because you have $100,000 dollars, J-Lo shouldn't have to sing at your birthday if she doesn't want to. If she inks the deal then decides that it's too "low brow" for her to do such a thing or finds you to be repugnant due to your idiotic ramblings on the Internet...too bad. She signed the deal. The same with the churches and bakers. If you refuse before hand...no problem with it. If you refuse after you find out the parties are in love with someone with the same anatomy (oh the horror)...too bad.

As for goods; that is a different animal. You don't have to like people you sell to and the transaction usually lasts a few moments; no injury is suffered by either party.

Health care is where it is most acute so that is why I bring it up. You don't like it...feel free to ignore it.

It's not what this conversation is about and you are trolling
We will all start to report you for off topic trolling till you are gone, let games begin ..............

Feel free.

This is the costs of everyone being able to disqualify themselves from society and the "survival of the fittest" social non-contracts that those with poor social skills and no friends prefer.

Having control over your own property does not equate to "survival of the fittest."
 
Seriously? I've explained it like 20'x already, including the post you just responded to. I'm guessing you're struggling with some sort of reading comprehension condition?

You're assuming I'm going to bother actually reading that nonsense then.

Actually I think I know why you think Fascism is left wing. It has a lot to do with the Nazis being "National Socialists" in name only. They weren't Socialists at all, the Socialists were purged long before Hitler was taking over Europe and killing the Jews. Night of the long knives I think was the major purge of the gay and left wing element of his party.

fascism definition of fascism in Oxford dictionary American English US

"An authoritarian and nationalisticright-wing system of government and social organization."

American Heritage Dictionary Entry fascism

"
1. oftenFascism
a.
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control."

Definition of ldquo fascism rdquo Collins English Dictionary

"
  1. any ideology or movement inspired by Italian Fascism, such as German National Socialism; any right-wing nationalist ideology or movement with an authoritarian and hierarchical structure that is fundamentally opposed to democracy and liberalism
  2. any ideology, movement, programme, tendency, etc, that may be characterized as right-wing, chauvinist, authoritarian, etc"

Fascism - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

"often capitalized: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralizedautocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition"

fascism - definition in the American English Dictionary - Cambridge Dictionaries Online

"a political system based on a very powerful leader, state control of social and economic life, and extreme pride in country and race, with no expression of political disagreement allowed"

Fascism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

"Fascism (/fæʃɪzəm/) is a form of radicalauthoritariannationalism[1][2] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. Influenced by national syndicalism, fascism originated inItaly during World War I, combining more typically right-wing positions with elements of left-wing politics,"

From Wikipedia, suggesting that it is mostly right wing, though at times has elements of left wing policies, which I won't dispute. However I will dispute that it is left wing.

"Although fascism is often placed on the far-right on the traditional left–right spectrum, a number of academics have said that the description is inadequate."

Which is probably true.

So, while some dictionaries describe it with extreme right wing, others don't. However they all say more or less the same thing.

So what does right and left wing mean?

right wing definition of right wing in Oxford dictionary American English US

"
The conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system.
[with reference to the National Assembly in France (1789–91), where the nobles sat to the president's right and the commons to the left]"

So it comes from the French National Assembly, extreme left and right weren't really there as a major force, so the terms far left and far right have developed since then, especially in the 20th Century when both Communism and Fascism came to play a major role in the world.

But the reality is that the definitions of what are far right and far left have come to be Fascism and Communist respectively.

It doesn't necessarily mean that they can't share aspects that might be considered left or right. Stalin's Communism wasn't Communism. Whatever it was, wasn't going to be considered by anyone as anything other than dictatorial, oppressive and not particularly looking out for equally or the people as might be considered in traditional leftist terms. But still we might call this far left.

Same with Fascism.

I'd guess that you're trying to make out that Stalin was extreme left, and Communist, therefore it was similar to Fascism, therefore Fascism is far left too. Which is really non-nonsensical.

Your definitions were all written by liberal English majors who don't know diddly squat about economics. The various isms refer to different economic systems, or they are utterly meaningless. Racism, dictatorship and nationalism are not peculiar to fascism nor are any of the other irrelevant criteria the authors of your definitions attempt to use to distinguish fascism from other economic systems.
Interesting project I'm working on (I'm part of the team). Our board decided that we would have speakers during 2015, every other month or so.

Anyway, we have some celebrities coming out to the desert to chat up the troops and provide a day of "food, fun, and fellowship".

The reason I bring it up is that we were turned down by some celebs who have confirmed open dates on their schedule (or rather their handlers--not sure the celeb ever heard the offer). Anyway, again, we have money to pay them...cash; they have an opening in their schedule. They just aren't interested.

I say, "Good for them." Nobody should be forced to do anything just because you want their services and can pay for it. If Bill Engvall signed a deal, however, and then said, "I really want to get away from corporate events. I'm not doing it." That's wrong.

Goods are a different matter. Businesses shouldn't have the right to refuse sale based on perceptions of lifestyle. If you've shop-lifted from them before...different story. IF there is nothing except the business owner's mis-conception of what you do in your spare time...that's not enough.

Sure they should. You have failed to post a single reason why they shouldn't, other than your indignation. You see, freedom means you get to do what you want with your property, even if someone else doesn't like it.

So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.
And why would he be the only pharmacist in town? Because no liberals are willing to step up and help society? They just want to mooch off of society while demanding everyone else step up?

Furthermore, even if he was the "only pharmacist in town", why couldn't the person in need just drive to another town?

This is the problem with liberals. They prefer absurd, make believe, what-if, tear-jerking scenario's over reality. Either drive to another town or use the pharmacists poor decision as a business opportunity. That's all a successful business is really - finding a need and filling it (any successful entrepreneur will tell you that). So now that your far-fetched tear-jerker has been covered, what else do you have for me? Are you ready to admit that people should be free to live their lives (even if that means living as bigots) or do you want to present some more far-fetched scenarios for me to cover?

So I guess if a hospital doesn't want black patients...they can do that? The patients should suck it up and open their own hospital? If the ambulance doesn't want to pick up whites...they should suck it up and limp to the next town? If the suspected Ebola patient isn't of a preferable color to be admitted..are you okay with them catching the local bus..or maybe they have smallpox???


The courts ruled on this long ago. Only bigoted idiots like you and brifart see the need to be able to discriminate.

They did? Where was this hospital or ambulance service that refused to serve black people?
 
I'm all for denying your services. Just because you have $100,000 dollars, J-Lo shouldn't have to sing at your birthday if she doesn't want to. If she inks the deal then decides that it's too "low brow" for her to do such a thing or finds you to be repugnant due to your idiotic ramblings on the Internet...too bad. She signed the deal. The same with the churches and bakers. If you refuse before hand...no problem with it. If you refuse after you find out the parties are in love with someone with the same anatomy (oh the horror)...too bad.

As for goods; that is a different animal. You don't have to like people you sell to and the transaction usually lasts a few moments; no injury is suffered by either party.

Health care is where it is most acute so that is why I bring it up. You don't like it...feel free to ignore it.

It's not what this conversation is about and you are trolling
We will all start to report you for off topic trolling till you are gone, let games begin ..............

Feel free.

This is the costs of everyone being able to disqualify themselves from society and the "survival of the fittest" social non-contracts that those with poor social skills and no friends prefer.

In other words, no cost whatsoever. Imaginary scenarios that never happened in reality are not a "cost."
 
Interesting project I'm working on (I'm part of the team). Our board decided that we would have speakers during 2015, every other month or so.

Anyway, we have some celebrities coming out to the desert to chat up the troops and provide a day of "food, fun, and fellowship".

The reason I bring it up is that we were turned down by some celebs who have confirmed open dates on their schedule (or rather their handlers--not sure the celeb ever heard the offer). Anyway, again, we have money to pay them...cash; they have an opening in their schedule. They just aren't interested.

I say, "Good for them." Nobody should be forced to do anything just because you want their services and can pay for it. If Bill Engvall signed a deal, however, and then said, "I really want to get away from corporate events. I'm not doing it." That's wrong.

Goods are a different matter. Businesses shouldn't have the right to refuse sale based on perceptions of lifestyle. If you've shop-lifted from them before...different story. IF there is nothing except the business owner's mis-conception of what you do in your spare time...that's not enough.

Sure they should. You have failed to post a single reason why they shouldn't, other than your indignation. You see, freedom means you get to do what you want with your property, even if someone else doesn't like it.

So if you're the only pharmacist in town, you can decide to not sell blood pressure medication to white folks or black folks because you don't like them...

And you wonder why you're correctly thought of as an idiot.


Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town.

Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

Google shows there are 3 pharmacies in Mariposa Ca.

Pioneer Market
5034 Coakley Cir, Mariposa, CA ‎

Rite Aid Pharmacy
4994 Joe Howard St, Mariposa, CA ‎
(209) 742-7600 ‎ · riteaid.com

Dynamite & Drugstore
5102 Jessie St, Mariposa, CA ‎ (209) 742-4141

So you think someone is stupid enough not to get his prescription filled before Saturday if he knows he's going to die if he doesn't?

Who dies because because he's one day late getting his heart medication?

You really are a fucking idiot.
 
Mariposa, CA. Go.

Stayed there last week. They have 2 pharmacies (one is in a super market); the other is not open on weekends (or was at least closed that weekend). If the people at the Pioneer market didn't want to sell heart medication on Saturday...I guess we'll just do what the GOP prefers...let them die.

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com


Nice try:

Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town


Twenty miles--3 Pharmacies. Your conditions...not mine.

You're link listed pharmacies in

Merced, nearly twice the distance
Camp Hill, PA, something like 1800 miles away
Chowchilla, CA, further than Merced
etc...

Come back when you can meet your own standards...

Are you insane?

Pharmacy 1.

Rite Aid
4994 Joe Howard St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

Other Locations »

(209) 742-7600

Pharmacy 2

Dynamite & Drugstore
5102 Jessie St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-4141

Pharmacy 3

Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

Pharmacy 4
Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

So, that is FOUR that are RIGHT IN TOWN.

None of the pharmacies on that page were in PA, I don't even know where you came up with that at.

Not quite the case...

Well, you listed Pioneer twice.

And Dynamite & Drugstore is actually a marijuana dispensary...Screenshot below.

View attachment 33677

View attachment 33677
Yes, I mis posted

There are two Rite AIds, a Pioneer, a Dynamite IN TOWN

Dynamite might sell medical marijuana, but that is not all they sell, notice they call themselves a DRUG store.

In either case, I produced at minimum 3, I say 4 Pharmacies, RIGHT IN TOWN.

Why you idiotic troll liberals can't just say "okay you proved me wrong on that one" is fucking beyond me.
No..there is one Rite Aid and the Pioneer. The facts prove you wrong...I merely pointed them out.
 
Business decisions were all made by the government. The "owners" were effectively nothing more than factory managers carrying out the orders of government bureaucrats. The Nazis even had 5 years plans, just like the communist. "ownership" doesn't mean a thing without control. If you don't make the decisions regarding how some property is used, then you don't really own it. There was no private ownership of productive enterprises in Nazi Germany, so their economy was a form of socialism.

So... this makes it left wing?

You're basically looking at Soviet Russia, making a lot of assumptions, then seeing some similarities with Nazi Germany and you reckon this means Nazi Germany was far left?

Seriously?
 
Actually I think I know why you think Fascism is left wing. It has a lot to do with the Nazis being "National Socialists" in name only.
No, it's because the ideology that wants big government, higher taxes, more centralized government, more regulation, less freedom of personal choice and more spending is the left.

You make the assumption that far right wants more freedom, smaller govt. Why?

You're basically putting US politics onto the rest of the world, it doesn't work.

Generally right wing is conservative and reactionary.

However when you get into extremes, you're going to find stuff that's similar on the far right and far left, they're extreme, they need to have strong govt to enforce their will.

Communism, pure Communism, not that which existed in the USSR, China etc, would not have government run by a strong man at all. It would be the people working for the people, direct democracy, choices being the will of the people. Small govt doesn't even describe Communism.
Yet you're telling me that far left is strong authoritarian govt. But authoritarian govt in this sense explains the EXTREME part, not the left or the right part.
 
Most reasonable and prudent people do not let there political fanaticism influence their direct interactions with the public. As a pharmacist I would think as long as you met legal requirements you would be treated irregardless of skin color or race ..................

Also as one who dispenses medications for the betterment / continuation of life, ones political preferences would be of the least of your concerns ...............

You see it is only petty and vengeful people like you who would withhold medication from a sick person because of their beliefs ............. what a shit bag for even suggesting such a thing !!

Think about the deep south for a minute. There were plenty of petty and vengeful people.

What some people are calling for is the ability of private companies to do as they please, as if they don't have a responsibility.

The reality is that all business owners live in the real world and have to abide by laws which prevent them discriminating against people. Where this line is drawn is not an exact science, however no one should be denied anything based on what they do at home, who they're married to, how they were born etc etc.

For example, i don't have a problem with churches stopping people who aren't members of their church from getting married in their church. That's a membership issue.

Sure, you could claim a cafe could do membership to stop black people eating in their place, but it doesn't seem to happen much, if at all.
 
They did? Where was this hospital or ambulance service that refused to serve black people?

What about the deep south 100 years ago...

I mean, people's worries weren't that they couldn't get a hospital, it's whether the local doctor would come out and lynch them.
 
But that's just it SG - the business is not likely to thrive or even survive turning people away. So why does the left feel the need to force businesses to conduct transactions that they are not comfortable with? Why not just let business operate "organically" (for lack of a better word) and they will thrive or perish based on their own decisions and the reaction of their customers and the public? Why is the left so obsessed with control? It's sick and it's scary. You now who else shared that same obsession? Adolf Hitler. Saddam Hussein. Joseph Stalin. Not people I would want to act like or be associated with in any way.

Um, I' think you are a little confused here.

Hitler killed people because of their race or sexual orientation.

Bigots refuse to do business withe people because of their race or sexual orientation.

Public Accommodation laws. They work just fine, thanks.
 
And you know what the beauty of that is SG? The customer is free to walk away from her business because of her sign and never return. The same is not true of the type of government that you advocate for. Government - including ours - literally places a gun to your head and forces you to comply. How pissed off would you be if BlackSand's business placed a gun to your head and made you patronize their place of business 4x's a week? (Hint: you would be furious). Isn't freedom and free markets a better choice?

Nope. NOt really. YOu see, the thing is, I end up supporting businesses I never patronize merely by paying taxes and supporting the infrastructure that allow that business to thrive. For instance, the Police spend a lot more time protecting businesses than they do protecting me personally.

So when that day comes when I need that business' services, I don't want to hear any shit about how they don't approve of what I'm doing. Get over it. You offer that service, you provide that service for the price advertised. Period.
 

Forum List

Back
Top