It’s not dear. It’s not.You hear that? The money’s endless. It grows on trees!Look at like this:
A fictional town with 100 people. Is it better for one person to make 90% of that money or all 100 of them to make a roughly equal share. More people with equal income will mean more people can buy more.
The United States is not your fictional town and there is no encapsulated money. The liberal philosophy is that the US is a bubble. Within this bubble, there is only so much money. That means when one in this bubble has too much, that's the reason the rest in the bubble have too little.
Money is endless in this country. There is no finite amount. You can make as much as you want or as little as you want, and it doesn't matter how much money the rich have.
Until I apply for a bank loan, and they tell me they would love to give me one, but the rich have all the money, then this liberal philosophy is totally flawed. Or if I ask my employer for a raise, and he tells me he would love to give me one, but the rich have all the money.
This has never happened and never will.
Lol
It's not? Then show me one situation......any situation where somebody was denied money because there wasn't enough to go around because the rich have it all.
Money supply - total amount of monetary assets available in an economy at a specific time.
Money is not continually printed and circulated constantly. There’s a set amount.