When are the Guardians of the 2nd Amendment going to Act?

[WinterBorn]

And I'm doing that. I am the one who is writing the guide to a three-level constitutional convention series.

You Do Not want a constitutional convention.

First of all, our politicians are bought and paid for.
Second, by the time the lawyers finish writing it in legal jargon, most citizens will not understand it. And they will let others tell them what it means.
Third, so many voters cast their vote on an emotional level, and that will be bad for the 2nd amendment.

You are just jealous that you were not able to figure the problem and solution.

If you were not jealous, you would tease me by asking me how you can help - to see if I have the next step.

You're not doing that. You're determined to discourage me - why would you care???

Fuck it - what do you care if I make a fool of myself??? You don't like me, here.

No, not at all. I am simply pointing out why opening that particular can of worms is a bad idea.

You say I don't like you here? I don't have an opinion about you being here one way or the other. Lighten up on your martyr complex.

 

[WinterBorn]

And I'm doing that. I am the one who is writing the guide to a three-level constitutional convention series.

You Do Not want a constitutional convention.

First of all, our politicians are bought and paid for.
Second, by the time the lawyers finish writing it in legal jargon, most citizens will not understand it. And they will let others tell them what it means.
Third, so many voters cast their vote on an emotional level, and that will be bad for the 2nd amendment.

You are just jealous that you were not able to figure the problem and solution.

If you were not jealous, you would tease me by asking me how you can help - to see if I have the next step.

You're not doing that. You're determined to discourage me - why would you care???

Fuck it - what do you care if I make a fool of myself??? You don't like me, here.

I don't care if you make a fool of yourself. Everyone has the right to do that.

I am afraid for what could happen if you succeed.

 

[WinterBorn]

I cannot afford a gun, ammunition, or shooting range time. If I could, I would.

But here we are. Everybody has a complaint about the government. Conservatives saw the Obama Administration deploy the IRS to harass conservative organizations, Fast and Furious gun sales to Mexican cartels, Hillary Clinton neglect for the Benghazi ambassador who was hiding weapons and munitions for someone, and then she was also sharing classified information on an unsecured internet server. All of which was not prosecuted.

The liberals described Trump to be a tyrant.

Both sides are making the same complaint - one side is correct. Neither side can do anything about it.

And here we are, and it should be obvious to gun owners that Joe Biden lacks the mental capacity to conduct the powers of the presidency. Obviously, he is the "puppet president." His handlers were/are negligent with the immigration flow at the southern border, and nobody is doing anything to correct the inhumanity. This emboldens the Biden handlers.

The tyranny is upon us. They are going to dismantle a bunch of other things before they enact gun confiscation.

It will be too late then.

You have a First Amendment and it is first not second.

Please explain why the First Amendment has any bearing on this thread. I won't hold my breath, because you typically post shit and run.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

The tyranny is upon us. They are going to dismantle a bunch of other things before they enact gun confiscation.

It will be too late then.

You have a First Amendment and it is first not second.

Please explain why the First Amendment has any bearing on this thread. I won't hold my breath, because you typically post shit and run.

How about you advance us all to the next level of social media that most of us expected to find at discussion forums. Put together the rules that will properly deliberate discussions. If you can figure that out, you will probably make a lot of money.

 

[WinterBorn]

The tyranny is upon us. They are going to dismantle a bunch of other things before they enact gun confiscation.

It will be too late then.

You have a First Amendment and it is first not second.

Please explain why the First Amendment has any bearing on this thread. I won't hold my breath, because you typically post shit and run.

How about you advance us all to the next level of social media that most of us expected to find at discussion forums. Put together the rules that will properly deliberate discussions. If you can figure that out, you will probably make a lot of money.

I am fine with the rules here. I have been frequenting discussion forums since the days of dialup. This is where I have been the longest.

 

[Colin norris]

Ho hum. Another thread of right-wing terrorists encouraging more right-wing terrorism. It must be a day ending in "y".

What makes in worse, in my opinion, is that it is another person pushing for others to start the fighting. The OP will not be involved in the bloodshed or the dying. He wants others to do it for him.

Act? What do you propose? Armed revolution?

I am not asking anyone to do anything for me, except to campaign for a three-level charter convention series to reorder the erroneous charter system.

My point is that the argument that the Second Amendment is composed to provide the citizens to rebel a tyrannical government has been deteriorated to inert, or moot. So arguments suggesting that the problem is that "they are not following the Constitution," cannot be resolved. What are you going to do?

The amendment has not deteriorated at all. The problem is you have missed the opportunity to get rid of tyrants like trump. Yes trump. He was a fascist.
None of you had the courage to admit it because he and you lot are republicans.
That's the problem.
Now Biden's there you are rallying the troops to oust him. Really?
You're a bit late comrade.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

Ho hum. Another thread of right-wing terrorists encouraging more right-wing terrorism. It must be a day ending in "y".

What makes in worse, in my opinion, is that it is another person pushing for others to start the fighting. The OP will not be involved in the bloodshed or the dying. He wants others to do it for him.

Act? What do you propose? Armed revolution?

I am not asking anyone to do anything for me, except to campaign for a three-level charter convention series to reorder the erroneous charter system.

My point is that the argument that the Second Amendment is composed to provide the citizens to rebel a tyrannical government has been deteriorated to inert, or moot. So arguments suggesting that the problem is that "they are not following the Constitution," cannot be resolved. What are you going to do?

The amendment has not deteriorated at all.

That is not what I described as deteriorated.

The problem is you have missed the opportunity to get rid of tyrants like trump. Yes trump. He was a fascist.
None of you had the courage to admit it because he and you lot are republicans.
That's the problem.
Now Biden's there you are rallying the troops to oust him. Really?
You're a bit late comrade.

I am pretty sure that I described in the opening post that both sides are accusing the other side of tyranny, and that that means one side is probably correct, but neither side is able to do anything.

You're not too bright, pal, I suggest you stay away from my arguments - you no good.

 

[Colin norris]

Ho hum. Another thread of right-wing terrorists encouraging more right-wing terrorism. It must be a day ending in "y".

What makes in worse, in my opinion, is that it is another person pushing for others to start the fighting. The OP will not be involved in the bloodshed or the dying. He wants others to do it for him.

Act? What do you propose? Armed revolution?

I am not asking anyone to do anything for me, except to campaign for a three-level charter convention series to reorder the erroneous charter system.

My point is that the argument that the Second Amendment is composed to provide the citizens to rebel a tyrannical government has been deteriorated to inert, or moot. So arguments suggesting that the problem is that "they are not following the Constitution," cannot be resolved. What are you going to do?

The amendment has not deteriorated at all.

That is not what I described as deteriorated.

The problem is you have missed the opportunity to get rid of tyrants like trump. Yes trump. He was a fascist.
None of you had the courage to admit it because he and you lot are republicans.
That's the problem.
Now Biden's there you are rallying the troops to oust him. Really?
You're a bit late comrade.

I am pretty sure that I described in the opening post that both sides are accusing the other side of tyranny, and that that means one side is probably correct, but neither side is able to do anything.

You're not too bright, pal, I suggest you stay away from my arguments - you no good.

Republican gun nuts have been belching their tyranny justification for years.
Not democrats. You failed to act with courage of your convictions.

My problem is I'm smarter than you son and you dont like it when I ping you guys about your paranoia. The one correct here is me for calling you cowards out for not doing anything about trump. You now have no licence to do anything like that again.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I cannot afford a gun, ammunition, or shooting range time. If I could, I would.

But here we are. Everybody has a complaint about the government. Conservatives saw the Obama Administration deploy the IRS to harass conservative organizations, Fast and Furious gun sales to Mexican cartels, Hillary Clinton neglect for the Benghazi ambassador who was hiding weapons and munitions for someone, and then she was also sharing classified information on an unsecured internet server. All of which was not prosecuted.

The liberals described Trump to be a tyrant.

Both sides are making the same complaint - one side is correct. Neither side can do anything about it.

And here we are, and it should be obvious to gun owners that Joe Biden lacks the mental capacity to conduct the powers of the presidency. Obviously, he is the "puppet president." His handlers were/are negligent with the immigration flow at the southern border, and nobody is doing anything to correct the inhumanity. This emboldens the Biden handlers.

The tyranny is upon us. They are going to dismantle a bunch of other things before they enact gun confiscation.

It will be too late then.

You have to wait till they have nothing left to lose anymore ....the time is rapidly approaching ...
Guess who the wokesters are driving into our arms
Ex military and police

 

[MisterBeale]

I cannot afford a gun, ammunition, or shooting range time. If I could, I would.

But here we are. Everybody has a complaint about the government. Conservatives saw the Obama Administration deploy the IRS to harass conservative organizations, Fast and Furious gun sales to Mexican cartels, Hillary Clinton neglect for the Benghazi ambassador who was hiding weapons and munitions for someone, and then she was also sharing classified information on an unsecured internet server. All of which was not prosecuted.

The liberals described Trump to be a tyrant.

Both sides are making the same complaint - one side is correct. Neither side can do anything about it.

And here we are, and it should be obvious to gun owners that Joe Biden lacks the mental capacity to conduct the powers of the presidency. Obviously, he is the "puppet president." His handlers were/are negligent with the immigration flow at the southern border, and nobody is doing anything to correct the inhumanity. This emboldens the Biden handlers.

The tyranny is upon us. They are going to dismantle a bunch of other things before they enact gun confiscation.

It will be too late then.

You could support candidates that propose to arm the Homeless. . .

The Senate Candidate Who Wants to Arm the Homeless Explains Himself

The libertarian says that a lot of people have told him it's "the dumbest idea I've ever heard.” But he's standing by it.

www.vice.com

Libertarian Candidate for US Senate Wants to Arm the Homeless

Saying that homeless people are “constantly victims of violent crime,” Brian Ellison believes we should arm the homeless with firearms so they can defend themselves.

theantimedia.com

 

[justinacolmena]

You have a First Amendment and it is first not second.

What? Both the First and the Second Amendments have been duly proposed and ratified.

 

[westwall]

Ho hum. Another thread of right-wing terrorists encouraging more right-wing terrorism. It must be a day ending in "y".

What makes in worse, in my opinion, is that it is another person pushing for others to start the fighting. The OP will not be involved in the bloodshed or the dying. He wants others to do it for him.

And, he's a leftwing loon. Go figure.

 

[Smokin' OP]

View attachment 490896

After the shooting of Ashli Babbitt on the 6th of January 2021 it's time to enact a new Constitutional Amendment establishing Castle Doctrine throughout the United States.

If shooting a unarmed protester, without warning or the use of non-lethal force, is good enough for our legislators then it's good enough for all home and business owners.

*****SMILE*****

The dumb bitch wasn't a protester, they were still in the street.
She was a Q NUT insurrectionist, that tried and failed.
"Without warning'?
Hmmmmmm, so you have 2 armed dozen police on one side of the doorway, the Trump cult on the other side trying to break in, breaking windows and beating cops and RWNJ's think they need a "warning"?

 

[justinacolmena]

RWNJ's think they need a "warning"?

"Right Wing Nut Job" again. Makes me think dishonorable Air Force trash —

So the dudes have a sack of nuts, they prefer to jack off to the left, and there's a babe in the military who won't "put out" so they kill her or have her killed.

 

[Smokin' OP]

RWNJ's think they need a "warning"?

"Right Wing Nut Job" again. Makes me think dishonorable Air Force trash —

So the dudes have a sack of nuts, they prefer to jack off to the left, and there's a babe in the military who won't "put out" so they kill her or have her killed.

You think I should address them as "conservatives" as what they claim they are?
They aren't and never were, unless a democrat is in office or it's election time.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

The dumb bitch wasn't a protester, they were still in the street.
She was a Q NUT insurrectionist, that tried and failed.
"Without warning'?
Hmmmmmm, so you have 2 armed dozen police on one side of the doorway, the Trump cult on the other side trying to break in, breaking windows and beating cops and RWNJ's think they need a "warning"?

Then you need to write your congresspersons and have them write a Amendment establishing Castle Doctrine for all people in the United States.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Pellinore]

I haven't seen much change in gun control one way or the other for several administrations now, honestly. The anti-gun-control right has done an effective job shutting down any significant legislation. President Obama, by his own admission, was frustrated that they couldn't get any action in Congress, even after the high-strung emotions from the Connecticut shooting. And spare a thought for poor Beto O'Rourke, who was a solid second-tier candidate until that mass shooting at the Wal-Mart in his hometown spurred him to change his message to "You're damn right we're coming to take your guns!" His campaign cratered to the Zero-Percent level, instantly. It's a third rail.

It seems as if the biggest chances for any real movement right now are against high-capacity magazines, for waiting periods, and instituting red-flag laws, none of which come close to "They're coming to take our guns." Even so, for whatever reason, there's this huge contingent of heartland Americans who think their Second Amendment rights are teetering on the brink of extinction. Go figure.

 

[Pellinore]

Also, that's Caerphilly Castle, in southeastern Wales, dating back to the 13th (?) century, I think. It was built by the de Clare family, who just happen to be ancestors of mine. It's a gorgeous site, even if I do expect that one tower to fall into the lake any day now.

 

[Smokin' OP]

The dumb bitch wasn't a protester, they were still in the street.
She was a Q NUT insurrectionist, that tried and failed.
"Without warning'?
Hmmmmmm, so you have 2 armed dozen police on one side of the doorway, the Trump cult on the other side trying to break in, breaking windows and beating cops and RWNJ's think they need a "warning"?

View attachment 491493

Then you need to write your congresspersons and have them write a Amendment establishing Castle Doctrine for all people in the United States.

*****SMILE*****

Don't need one, is she that stupid she was in the Air Force for 14 years?
She didn't think police with guns, aren't going to defend themselves?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

The dumb bitch wasn't a protester, they were still in the street.
She was a Q NUT insurrectionist, that tried and failed.
"Without warning'?
Hmmmmmm, so you have 2 armed dozen police on one side of the doorway, the Trump cult on the other side trying to break in, breaking windows and beating cops and RWNJ's think they need a "warning"?

View attachment 491493

Then you need to write your congresspersons and have them write a Amendment establishing Castle Doctrine for all people in the United States.

*****SMILE*****

Don't need one, is she that stupid she was in the Air Force for 14 years?
She didn't think police with guns, aren't going to defend themselves?

Yes we do because if shooting an unarmed protestor because you fear for your life is good enough reason for our congresspersons then obviously a good enough reason for homeowners and businessmen.

So write your congressperson because we need Castle Doctrine to be made into a Constitutional Amendment of the United States.

*****SMILE*****