Plasmaball
Gold Member
- Sep 9, 2010
- 20,629
- 2,194
- 175
Once again, and for the umpteenth time today... the limits on our speech have to do with impeding the unalienable rights of our fellow citizens. We're not allowed to threaten people if our threats are deemed credible, we're not allowed to slander them in such a way as to imperil their livelihood, we're not allowed to use our words to cause imminent bodily harm. The thread running through those examples is that another citizen's natural rights are violated. The free exercise of one person's rights may not impede upon the like rights of another. That doesn't mean we don't have free speech. It simply means that our right to it doesn't outweigh the natural rights of others.
But we DO NOT have a right to never feel offended. And people who act on their offended feelings violently are DIRECTLY responsible for their own actions.
I don't disagree nor was I stating otherwise. What I was saying is you have the right to call me an asshole, and while I may not have the right. The end consequence is you being punched in the face a few times.
More to the point the director as well is. Directly responsible for the content of what he puts out and is to blame.
Or does he not get any of the blame at all? If that's the case micheal moore is quite innocent.
Careful you are running into hypocrite territory...
If I call you an asshole and you punch me in the face, I have not violated your rights, but you have violated mine because you've caused actual harm. The only guy getting charged with a crime is you.
Of course the moron who put this tasteless movie together has earned criticism. He doesn't have the right to never be offended either. But that doesn't excuse violence done to him or because of him. In that, he is blameless. The blame for violence rests singularly on the shoulders of those who perpetrated it. It is this which makes society civilized.
Michael Moore is an idiot, with less charm and appeal than a toad, but he has an absolute right to say what he wants without fear of reprisal so long as his speech doesn't impede any other individual citizen's like rights. And if it does, that's a matter of LAW, not of the mob.
jesus christ no shit its against the law to hit someone. That wasnt the point.
I never stated violence should be excused, You really should read what i am writing and not state redundant nothings.
great then you agree he doesnt take any blame either.