When Hillary paid foreigners for dirt on a rival it was OK.....

The FBI and CIA were weaponized to try and keep Trump out of the oval office. FBI agents working on the case were caught red handing slinging unabashed snobbish disdain towards Americans who *might* be likely to vote for Trump: the smelly walmart shopper comments.

And were you ok with that happening?


Certainly not. But it doesn't matter what I think. I'm a white male trump voter.

Ok, so you were not ok with it which means you think it is wrong for the government to do such things.

Unless it is Trump, then it is ok.

This is because you are a mindless hypocritical sheep and your morals change based upon the political party of the one doing the action.
Will the FBI, CIA and DNC ever be held accountable for their actions? Even though it was much more egregious than what Trump is accused of doing? No they won't and it's Anti-american to even suggest the idea.
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?

Hillary wasn't President or a member of the government. She was a private citizen.

Trump is using the power of the Presidency for personal gain.
I expected some pretzel logic responses but that is just stupid.

seeking help from a foreign government official or a representative of a foreign government is a bozo no no. everything that president dotard did was exactly that.

America’s top election official explains why Trump may be committing crimes
Soliciting foreign interference doesn’t just violate norms. It also violates the law.
By Aaron Rupar@atrupar Oct 4, 2019, 9:50am EDT

America’s top election official explains why Trump may be committing crimes

FACT CHECK: Foreign Interference And 'Opposition Research' Are Not The Same
June 13, 20191:06 PM ET

FACT CHECK: Foreign Interference And 'Opposition Research' Are Not The Same

I just wanted to bump this. Should have ended the thread.

You can pay for something up front and legal like Hillary did or you can try to get stolen information from Russian like Trump did.

Imagine it like this...Hillary bought a TV with a warranty from Best Buy. Trump tried to get one given to him that someone else stole. That was 2016. Now it's Trump using the power of his office to get people to make up TVs out of whole cloth.
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?

Hillary wasn't President or a member of the government. She was a private citizen.

Trump is using the power of the Presidency for personal gain.
I expected some pretzel logic responses but that is just stupid.

seeking help from a foreign government official or a representative of a foreign government is a bozo no no. everything that president dotard did was exactly that.

America’s top election official explains why Trump may be committing crimes
Soliciting foreign interference doesn’t just violate norms. It also violates the law.
By Aaron Rupar@atrupar Oct 4, 2019, 9:50am EDT

America’s top election official explains why Trump may be committing crimes

FACT CHECK: Foreign Interference And 'Opposition Research' Are Not The Same
June 13, 20191:06 PM ET

FACT CHECK: Foreign Interference And 'Opposition Research' Are Not The Same

I just wanted to bump this. Should have ended the thread.

You can pay for something up front and legal like Hillary did or you can try to get stolen information from Russian like Trump did.

Imagine it like this...Hillary bought a TV with a warranty from Best Buy. Trump tried to get one given to him that someone else stole. That was 2016. Now it's Trump using the power of his office to get people to make up TVs out of whole cloth.
And they say sasquatch is a myth!
 
Don't you know that Democrats can do no wrong?
At least that is what they want you to believe
 
When Hillary paid foreigners for dirt on a rival it was OK.....

Yes, it was OK. Hillary wasn't president - or even a government employee - and the Steele Dossier was paid for with private funds. Whereas, Trump is using the weight of the presidency and using taxpayer funds to strong-arm foreign countries to dig up dirt on the Bidens. Big difference.

But, my friend, what you post is LOGICAL and TRUE......and neither logic nor truth is allowable within the cult membership.
 
The FBI and CIA were weaponized to try and keep Trump out of the oval office. FBI agents working on the case were caught red handing slinging unabashed snobbish disdain towards Americans who *might* be likely to vote for Trump: the smelly walmart shopper comments.

And were you ok with that happening?


Certainly not. But it doesn't matter what I think. I'm a white male trump voter.

Ok, so you were not ok with it which means you think it is wrong for the government to do such things.

Unless it is Trump, then it is ok.

This is because you are a mindless hypocritical sheep and your morals change based upon the political party of the one doing the action.

If all the agencies were allegedly "weaponized" to keep Trump out of office, how come the only candidate to get publicly censured by the FBI wasn't Trump? All we ever heard about was Hillary's emails and yet on election day only one candidate was under active investigation and we, the American people, didn't know about it.
 
The Mueller witch hunt was centered on Hillary standing there waving her incriminating Russian connection paperwork while they scrambled like mad for two years trying to conjour up Trumps Russian paperwork connection.
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?
Hillary paid NO foreigners. Please post a copy of the check her campaign wrote to a foreigner.

who still uses checks? Is this 1985?
920x920.jpg

Already posted by a fellow Leftist of yours. Now find one issued to a foreigner.
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?

Hillary wasn't President or a member of the government. She was a private citizen.

Trump is using the power of the Presidency for personal gain.
I expected some pretzel logic responses but that is just stupid.

seeking help from a foreign government official or a representative of a foreign government is a bozo no no. everything that president dotard did was exactly that.

America’s top election official explains why Trump may be committing crimes
Soliciting foreign interference doesn’t just violate norms. It also violates the law.
By Aaron Rupar@atrupar Oct 4, 2019, 9:50am EDT

America’s top election official explains why Trump may be committing crimes

FACT CHECK: Foreign Interference And 'Opposition Research' Are Not The Same
June 13, 20191:06 PM ET

FACT CHECK: Foreign Interference And 'Opposition Research' Are Not The Same

I just wanted to bump this. Should have ended the thread.

You can pay for something up front and legal like Hillary did or you can try to get stolen information from Russian like Trump did.

Imagine it like this...Hillary bought a TV with a warranty from Best Buy. Trump tried to get one given to him that someone else stole. That was 2016. Now it's Trump using the power of his office to get people to make up TVs out of whole cloth.
And they say sasquatch is a myth!
That's not a debate of what was stated. Hillary paid for information. It was 100% legal. In 2016 Trump tried to get stolen information from a foreign country hostile to the US. Now in 2019 he's using the power of his office to get countries to launch investigations into his rival. That's what Putin does in Russia.
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal. How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?
Hillary wasn't President or a member of the government. She was a private citizen. Trump is using the power of the Presidency for personal gain.
I expected some pretzel logic responses but that is just stupid.
Not nearly as stupid as the original question. Whatever Hillary did was private person to private person. Trump was using the authority of his office to influence another leader to use the power of their office, TOTALLY different animals.
Trump was a private citizen when the left accused him of treason in colluding with the Russians.

The left never accused Trump of "treason", because his crimes don't meet the constitutional definition of "treason".

Obviously the criteria didn’t fit, they still accused him of it. Do you really need me to give you links?
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?

Hillary wasn't President or a member of the government. She was a private citizen.

Trump is using the power of the Presidency for personal gain.
Hillary's husband was a potus,, she was secretary of state. The Clintons have specialized in getting rich thru government....unlike Trump.

Has the $40 million Ivanka, part of the inauguration money that is unaccounted for been found?
Trump Inauguration Money Went to Trump Organization With Help From Ivanka, Report Says
Sounds like yellow journalism to me
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?

Hillary wasn't President or a member of the government. She was a private citizen.

Trump is using the power of the Presidency for personal gain.
Hillary's husband was a potus,, she was secretary of state. The Clintons have specialized in getting rich thru government....unlike Trump.

Doesn't matter. It may be "swampy" to make money after you're out of office, but it's not illegal.

Trump using the power of the Presidency to ask another country's President to advance his own personal political agenda by discrediting a political rival is corruption. If the Clinton's did the same thing, you guys' heads would explode.
No he didn’t
 
When Trump asks foreign leaders to investigate corruption of our former leaders it's considered criminal.


How can ANYONE rationalize these two positions??? How can you condemn Trump while COMPLETELY excusing Hillary and expect ANYONE to take you seriously?
Hillary paid NO foreigners. Please post a copy of the check her campaign wrote to a foreigner.

who still uses checks? Is this 1985?
920x920.jpg

Already posted by a fellow Leftist of yours. Now find one issued to a foreigner.
You don't get to move the goalposts.
 
All this stuff about Hillary being a "private citizen" sounds like spin to me. As if Hillary Clinton and the guy who collects my garbage every tuesday carries the same political influence.

It is not about influence, it is about what is right and wrong for the Fed Govt to do. Political parties spend millions (maybe billions) trying to find dirt on opponents, it is part of the game. Hell the Trump dossier was started by a Repub who was a rival of Trump's.

But that does not make it ok for the Fed Govt to do it for a candidate, the Govt is supposed to be neutral on such things.

Look at it this way, a HOA could legally put in their by-laws that political campaign signs are not allowed, but if the government came out and said you cannot put a political sign in your yard, that would not be legal or ok.
Investigating crime is an executive branch function, nimrod. Biden is a crook.
 
leveraging the power of his office

If you can prove this we can talk. But you can't.

Was Biden using the power of his office to help his son in a foreign country?

Is Tramp using the power of his office to enrich himself?
Trump is losing millions every year since he became president, dipstick.

Lie. He is enriching himself greatly. You didn't fall for what he said did you, geez, I guess you did.
 
leveraging the power of his office

If you can prove this we can talk. But you can't.

Was Biden using the power of his office to help his son in a foreign country?

Is Tramp using the power of his office to enrich himself?
Trump is losing millions every year since he became president, dipstick.

Lie. He is enriching himself greatly. You didn't fall for what he said did you, geez, I guess you did.
Trump has reported earning an estimated $2.3 billion since announcing presidential run...

 

Forum List

Back
Top