When Is Impeaching A President Warranted?

[MarcATL]

Clinton's lies were about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. He should have been upfront about it when he testified and he should have just ponied up the money he owed Ms. Jones. Congress had a lot of reason to be pissed at him.

The sexual relationship consisted almost entirely of blow jobs in the Oval Office. So he lied about a blow job and then the Republicans impeached him for it.

They impeached him for getting blow jobs.

Thanks.

 

[DukeU]

He lied about getting a blow job, which is what the Republicans impeached him for.

Bottom line, Clinton was impeached over a blow job.

Lookie here....... Defending the president for LIEING under oath.

If it's not that big of a deal, why lie?

 

[Nostra]

When you start the OP with a blatant lie you won't get a real discussion, Stupid.

Perjury and obstruction of justice were the crimes Clinton committed.

What was the lie that got Clinton impeached?

I told you it doesn't matter.

 

[Polishprince]

Clinton's lies were about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. He should have been upfront about it when he testified and he should have just ponied up the money he owed Ms. Jones. Congress had a lot of reason to be pissed at him.

The sexual relationship consisted almost entirely of blow jobs in the Oval Office. So he lied about a blow job and then the Republicans impeached him for it.

They impeached him for getting blow jobs.

Thanks.

No, they impeached him for LYING about the blowjobs, not for the act.

And the reason why he lied about it, was GREED. He didn't want to pay Ms. Jones the money he owed her for sexual harassment.

 

[MarcATL]

He said he did not have sexual relations with that women.

Biological, non refutable evidence showed he did.

So he lied.

Next question.

BTW....what happened to you? You used to have very insightful posts worth considering.

Now? You are acting as nothing but a partisan hack.

As I just stated above the sexual relations referred to were the blow jobs the President received from Monica.

The evidence you're talking about is the ejaculation left behind on one if Monica's blue dresses which the Republicans made sure the world knew all about.

Because of their craveness, it's been said that point consumption went down, because Americans got their rocks off from turning on the trial and masterbating while listening to the testimonies.

So yeah, the bottom line is that the Republicans impeached a President over blow jobs.

And regarding my posts, the only person that changed is looking back at you in the mirror. My posts have remained consistent throughout my tenure here.

Thanks.

 

[Dragonlady]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

You mean where a president takes trips to pedophile ilsand on the Loilita Express and then comes back and sexually harasses a young intern on the presidential desk? Gee wouldn't that get most CEOs fired?

Actually it wouldn't even get him admonished. The President didn't not go to Epstein's Island while in office. Not once. And Monica was a legal adult, in a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton, who she knew was married. He didn't "sexually harass" her or anyone else.

CEO's never get fired for sexually harassing interns. The girl is removed and paid off if she becomes a "problem". You don't live in the real world if you think otherwise.

Monica wasn't sexually harassed. She was a political groupie, who told friends she was "packing up her kneepads and going to Washington" after she graduated. She revelled in her part as "Presidential Mistress", right up until Republicans outed the relationship in the media, and turned her into a national laughingstock, forcing her to testfy against Bill Clinton.

So don't pretend that Bill Clinton was a predator here, or that the Republicans didn't abuse this girl and treat her far worse than Bill Clinton ever did. Monica nearly committed suicide over what Ken Starr did to her.

My big question about Clinton lying under oath. Why was the question allowed to be asked?

There must be a question of relevance concerning the investigation... The investigation had no guard rails...

Compare that to Trump, he managed to go these investigation and not testify...

Clinton lied and deserved to be impeached, the mitigating circumstances was that the question shouldn't have been asked. Monica had to have mother and herself threatened with jail if she didn't testify...

He was in the middle of a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by a subordinate. The fact he was diddling a subordinate with a cigar is relevant to that procerding.

Wrong again a$$hat. A reporter for a small magazine published an article that said a woman named "Paula", who worked for the State of Alabama, and who is married to an Alabama State Trooper, gave Bill Clinton a blow job at a motel. Paula Jones took offense at this article saying "I never gave him a blow job, I turned him down". Jones demanded an apology from the reporter for the Article.

The Republican Party approached Jones, and told her she had a case for "sexual harassment" against Clinton, and encouraged her to file suit. They'd pay for her lawyer. She told them all she wanted was an apology from the writer, but they convinced her she'd get rich.

The suit dragged on for 4 years, and was ultimately dismissed as a "malicious prosecution" by the judge, and dismissed "with prejudice", which meant Jones would have to pay Clinton's legal fees, and the suit could never be refiled. The Republican Party appealled the dismissal, and Clinton settled the suit, as he was now about to face impeachment over his lie about Lewinsky.

The suit was settled for $750,000. The Republican lawyers got $550,000 and Jones got $200,000 for four years of their lives. The Republican Party treatment of "Bill's women", was beyond, disgusting. The used these women shamelessly, and did far more harm than Bill Clinton every did.

Anita Broaddrick gave an affidavit in the Paul Jones case in regard to her long-rumoured one night stand with Clinton. She had told both her husband and her lover, that Clinton had raped her, but continued to work support Candidate Clinton, to volunteer for his campaigns and work on his behalf. Now divorced from her husband and married to her lover, so she told the court what happened, that the relationship was consenual and that Bill Clinton did not rape her.

Ken Starr threatened to charge Broaddick with perjury and throw her in jail, if she didn't change her affidavit and say Clinton raped her. If she recanted her affidavit in the Jones trial, and said Clinton raped her, she would be given immunity from prosecution. Since he had already jailed Susan McDougall for refusing to testify against Clinton, the threat was very real. He would have a trial and call her ex-husband, and others she had told the rape story to at the time, as witnesses. She changed her story.

FuckBois like you keep talking about Bill Clinton like he is this sexual predator. He's not. Bill is up for a good time, all the time, but unlike Donald Trump, he does take "No" for an answer. When Jones said "No" he stopped and she went home. Flower, Lewinsky, and others were all willing participants, and there are a LOT of political groupies.

 

[Polishprince]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

You mean where a president takes trips to pedophile ilsand on the Loilita Express and then comes back and sexually harasses a young intern on the presidential desk? Gee wouldn't that get most CEOs fired?

Actually it wouldn't even get him admonished. The President didn't not go to Epstein's Island while in office. Not once. And Monica was a legal adult, in a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton, who she knew was married. He didn't "sexually harass" her or anyone else.

CEO's never get fired for sexually harassing interns. The girl is removed and paid off if she becomes a "problem". You don't live in the real world if you think otherwise.

Monica wasn't sexually harassed. She was a political groupie, who told friends she was "packing up her kneepads and going to Washington" after she graduated. She revelled in her part as "Presidential Mistress", right up until Republicans outed the relationship in the media, and turned her into a national laughingstock, forcing her to testfy against Bill Clinton.

So don't pretend that Bill Clinton was a predator here, or that the Republicans didn't abuse this girl and treat her far worse than Bill Clinton ever did. Monica nearly committed suicide over what Ken Starr did to her.

My big question about Clinton lying under oath. Why was the question allowed to be asked?

There must be a question of relevance concerning the investigation... The investigation had no guard rails...

Compare that to Trump, he managed to go these investigation and not testify...

Clinton lied and deserved to be impeached, the mitigating circumstances was that the question shouldn't have been asked. Monica had to have mother and herself threatened with jail if she didn't testify...

He was in the middle of a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by a subordinate. The fact he was diddling a subordinate with a cigar is relevant to that procerding.

Wrong again a$$hat. A reporter for a small magazine published an article that said a woman named "Paula", who worked for the State of Alabama, and who is married to an Alabama State Trooper, gave Bill Clinton a blow job at a motel. Paula Jones took offense at this article saying "I never gave him a blow job, I turned him down". Jones demanded an apology from the reporter for the Article.

The Republican Party approached Jones, and told her she had a case for "sexual harassment" against Clinton, and encouraged her to file suit. They'd pay for her lawyer. She told them all she wanted was an apology from the writer, but they convinced her she'd get rich.

The suit dragged on for 4 years, and was ultimately dismissed as a "malicious prosecution" by the judge, and dismissed "with prejudice", which meant Jones would have to pay Clinton's legal fees, and the suit could never be refiled. The Republican Party appealled the dismissal, and Clinton settled the suit, as he was now about to face impeachment over his lie about Lewinsky.

The suit was settled for $750,000. The Republican lawyers got $550,000 and Jones got $200,000 for four years of their lives. The Republican Party treatment of "Bill's women", was beyond, disgusting. The used these women shamelessly, and did far more harm than Bill Clinton every did.

Anita Broaddrick gave an affidavit in the Paul Jones case in regard to her long-rumoured one night stand with Clinton. She had told both her husband and her lover, that Clinton had raped her, but continued to work support Candidate Clinton, to volunteer for his campaigns and work on his behalf. Now divorced from her husband and married to her lover, so she told the court what happened, that the relationship was consenual and that Bill Clinton did not rape her.

Ken Starr threatened to charge Broaddick with perjury and throw her in jail, if she didn't change her affidavit and say Clinton raped her. If she recanted her affidavit in the Jones trial, and said Clinton raped her, she would be given immunity from prosecution. Since he had already jailed Susan McDougall for refusing to testify against Clinton, the threat was very real. He would have a trial and call her ex-husband, and others she had told the rape story to at the time, as witnesses. She changed her story.

FuckBois like you keep talking about Bill Clinton like he is this sexual predator. He's not. Bill is up for a good time, all the time, but unlike Donald Trump, he does take "No" for an answer. When Jones said "No" he stopped and she went home. Flower, Lewinsky, and others were all willing participants, and there are a LOT of political groupies.

if Paula Jones didn't know that she was entitled to money since Clinton sexually harassed her , what's wrong with the Republican Party advising her of her rights? And what kind of cad was Slick Willy to brag to a state trooper that Ms. Jones gave him a blow job? Even if she did, although she didn't.

 

[SC Patriot]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

You mean where a president takes trips to pedophile ilsand on the Loilita Express and then comes back and sexually harasses a young intern on the presidential desk? Gee wouldn't that get most CEOs fired?

Actually it wouldn't even get him admonished. The President didn't not go to Epstein's Island while in office. Not once. And Monica was a legal adult, in a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton, who she knew was married. He didn't "sexually harass" her or anyone else.

CEO's never get fired for sexually harassing interns. The girl is removed and paid off if she becomes a "problem". You don't live in the real world if you think otherwise.

Monica wasn't sexually harassed. She was a political groupie, who told friends she was "packing up her kneepads and going to Washington" after she graduated. She revelled in her part as "Presidential Mistress", right up until Republicans outed the relationship in the media, and turned her into a national laughingstock, forcing her to testfy against Bill Clinton.

So don't pretend that Bill Clinton was a predator here, or that the Republicans didn't abuse this girl and treat her far worse than Bill Clinton ever did. Monica nearly committed suicide over what Ken Starr did to her.

My big question about Clinton lying under oath. Why was the question allowed to be asked?

There must be a question of relevance concerning the investigation... The investigation had no guard rails...

Compare that to Trump, he managed to go these investigation and not testify...

Clinton lied and deserved to be impeached, the mitigating circumstances was that the question shouldn't have been asked. Monica had to have mother and herself threatened with jail if she didn't testify...

He was in the middle of a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by a subordinate. The fact he was diddling a subordinate with a cigar is relevant to that procerding.

Wrong again a$$hat. A reporter for a small magazine published an article that said a woman named "Paula", who worked for the State of Alabama, and who is married to an Alabama State Trooper, gave Bill Clinton a blow job at a motel. Paula Jones took offense at this article saying "I never gave him a blow job, I turned him down". Jones demanded an apology from the reporter for the Article.

The Republican Party approached Jones, and told her she had a case for "sexual harassment" against Clinton, and encouraged her to file suit. They'd pay for her lawyer. She told them all she wanted was an apology from the writer, but they convinced her she'd get rich.

The suit dragged on for 4 years, and was ultimately dismissed as a "malicious prosecution" by the judge, and dismissed "with prejudice", which meant Jones would have to pay Clinton's legal fees, and the suit could never be refiled. The Republican Party appealled the dismissal, and Clinton settled the suit, as he was now about to face impeachment over his lie about Lewinsky.

The suit was settled for $750,000. The Republican lawyers got $550,000 and Jones got $200,000 for four years of their lives. The Republican Party treatment of "Bill's women", was beyond, disgusting. The used these women shamelessly, and did far more harm than Bill Clinton every did.

Anita Broaddrick gave an affidavit in the Paul Jones case in regard to her long-rumoured one night stand with Clinton. She had told both her husband and her lover, that Clinton had raped her, but continued to work support Candidate Clinton, to volunteer for his campaigns and work on his behalf. Now divorced from her husband and married to her lover, so she told the court what happened, that the relationship was consenual and that Bill Clinton did not rape her.

Ken Starr threatened to charge Broaddick with perjury and throw her in jail, if she didn't change her affidavit and say Clinton raped her. If she recanted her affidavit in the Jones trial, and said Clinton raped her, she would be given immunity from prosecution. Since he had already jailed Susan McDougall for refusing to testify against Clinton, the threat was very real. He would have a trial and call her ex-husband, and others she had told the rape story to at the time, as witnesses. She changed her story.

FuckBois like you keep talking about Bill Clinton like he is this sexual predator. He's not. Bill is up for a good time, all the time, but unlike Donald Trump, he does take "No" for an answer. When Jones said "No" he stopped and she went home. Flower, Lewinsky, and others were all willing participants, and there are a LOT of political groupies.

I guess "me too" was not relevant back then.

Got it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Clinton's lies were about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. He should have been upfront about it when he testified and he should have just ponied up the money he owed Ms. Jones. Congress had a lot of reason to be pissed at him.

The sexual relationship consisted almost entirely of blow jobs in the Oval Office. So he lied about a blow job and then the Republicans impeached him for it.

They impeached him for getting blow jobs.

Thanks.

Quit playing obtuse

 

[Orangecat]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

It never happened for a blowjob, dumbass. It was for lying under oath.

Let's try to have a real discussion.

When you grow up, we might have that option.

 

[bendog]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

I appreciate the OP, but seriously there ceased to be any point of discussing this when Slick was impeached, and possibly we can blame the Rehnquist Court for it because it allowed a sitting president to be sued for allegations of actions before he was elected of things that had nothing to do with his service as President. And the Roberts court has been back stroking like Michael Phelps

 

[Orangecat]

So he lied about a blow job and then the Republicans impeached him for it.
They impeached him for getting blow jobs.

You contradict yourself, kid. First you accurately say he lied, then act as if you didn't say that and claim he was impeached for getting blow jobs. You're a mental midget.

 

[Nostra]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

You mean where a president takes trips to pedophile ilsand on the Loilita Express and then comes back and sexually harasses a young intern on the presidential desk? Gee wouldn't that get most CEOs fired?

Actually it wouldn't even get him admonished. The President didn't not go to Epstein's Island while in office. Not once. And Monica was a legal adult, in a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton, who she knew was married. He didn't "sexually harass" her or anyone else.

CEO's never get fired for sexually harassing interns. The girl is removed and paid off if she becomes a "problem". You don't live in the real world if you think otherwise.

Monica wasn't sexually harassed. She was a political groupie, who told friends she was "packing up her kneepads and going to Washington" after she graduated. She revelled in her part as "Presidential Mistress", right up until Republicans outed the relationship in the media, and turned her into a national laughingstock, forcing her to testfy against Bill Clinton.

So don't pretend that Bill Clinton was a predator here, or that the Republicans didn't abuse this girl and treat her far worse than Bill Clinton ever did. Monica nearly committed suicide over what Ken Starr did to her.

My big question about Clinton lying under oath. Why was the question allowed to be asked?

There must be a question of relevance concerning the investigation... The investigation had no guard rails...

Compare that to Trump, he managed to go these investigation and not testify...

Clinton lied and deserved to be impeached, the mitigating circumstances was that the question shouldn't have been asked. Monica had to have mother and herself threatened with jail if she didn't testify...

He was in the middle of a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by a subordinate. The fact he was diddling a subordinate with a cigar is relevant to that procerding.

Wrong again a$$hat. A reporter for a small magazine published an article that said a woman named "Paula", who worked for the State of Alabama, and who is married to an Alabama State Trooper, gave Bill Clinton a blow job at a motel. Paula Jones took offense at this article saying "I never gave him a blow job, I turned him down". Jones demanded an apology from the reporter for the Article.

The Republican Party approached Jones, and told her she had a case for "sexual harassment" against Clinton, and encouraged her to file suit. They'd pay for her lawyer. She told them all she wanted was an apology from the writer, but they convinced her she'd get rich.

The suit dragged on for 4 years, and was ultimately dismissed as a "malicious prosecution" by the judge, and dismissed "with prejudice", which meant Jones would have to pay Clinton's legal fees, and the suit could never be refiled. The Republican Party appealled the dismissal, and Clinton settled the suit, as he was now about to face impeachment over his lie about Lewinsky.

The suit was settled for $750,000. The Republican lawyers got $550,000 and Jones got $200,000 for four years of their lives. The Republican Party treatment of "Bill's women", was beyond, disgusting. The used these women shamelessly, and did far more harm than Bill Clinton every did.

Anita Broaddrick gave an affidavit in the Paul Jones case in regard to her long-rumoured one night stand with Clinton. She had told both her husband and her lover, that Clinton had raped her, but continued to work support Candidate Clinton, to volunteer for his campaigns and work on his behalf. Now divorced from her husband and married to her lover, so she told the court what happened, that the relationship was consenual and that Bill Clinton did not rape her.

Ken Starr threatened to charge Broaddick with perjury and throw her in jail, if she didn't change her affidavit and say Clinton raped her. If she recanted her affidavit in the Jones trial, and said Clinton raped her, she would be given immunity from prosecution. Since he had already jailed Susan McDougall for refusing to testify against Clinton, the threat was very real. He would have a trial and call her ex-husband, and others she had told the rape story to at the time, as witnesses. She changed her story.

FuckBois like you keep talking about Bill Clinton like he is this sexual predator. He's not. Bill is up for a good time, all the time, but unlike Donald Trump, he does take "No" for an answer. When Jones said "No" he stopped and she went home. Flower, Lewinsky, and others were all willing participants, and there are a LOT of political groupies.

Once again you demonstrate you are a clueless dolt.

 

[22lcidw]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

It depends on who is doing it. Black people hate white people. They can' stand Jewish people even worse. Schiff and Nadler would be killed quickly by African Americans if they had easy access or if they were in the hood. And they pretend to be on the African American's side. When they are really for their own agendas.

 

[MisterBeale]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

That whole thing was to distract the American Public.

The prosecutor, and the establishment are largely part of the cabal that is associated with the CFR and Trilaterals. They all knew about the Clinton's dealing with China, and that campaign finance scandal, and the trading of high tech., for funds, which was far more scandalous than a blow job.

If that ever got out? It would smack of treason, and the American people, both on the left and the right would not only want him impeached, tried, kicked out of office, but also probably executed.

However, with this distraction, they not only managed to distract the population, they managed to transfer all our military tech, increase funding for the political establishment, and sell out millions and millions of American jobs, AND, there was no punishment for the treason!

. . . all due to the distraction of that stupid blow job, it was perfect!

Chinagate and the Clintons
Chinagate and the Clintons | The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Clinton Donors Charged in Massive Campaign-Finance Scheme


Criticism of investigation
In addition to partisan complaints from Republicans, columnists Charles Krauthammer, William Safire, and Morton Kondracke, as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested the investigations into the fund-raising controversies were willfully impeded.[51][52][53]

FBI agent Ivian Smith wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh that expressed "a lack of confidence" in the Justice Department's attorneys regarding the fund-raising investigation. He wrote: "I am convinced the team at... [the Department of Justice] leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up to the task... The impression left is the emphasis on how not to prosecute matters, not how to aggressively conduct investigations leading to prosecutions." Smith and three other FBI agents later testified before Congress in late 1999 that Justice Department prosecutors impeded their inquiry. FBI agent Daniel Wehr told Congress that the first head U.S. attorney in the investigation, Laura Ingersoll, told the agents they should "not pursue any matter related to solicitation of funds for access to the president. The reason given was, 'That's the way the American political process works.' I was scandalized by that," Wehr said. The four FBI agents also said that Ingersoll prevented them from executing search warrants to stop destruction of evidence and micromanaged the case beyond all reason.[54]

FBI agents were also denied the opportunity to ask President Clinton and Vice President Gore questions during Justice Department interviews in 1997 and 1998 and were only allowed to take notes. During the interviews, neither Clinton nor Gore were asked any questions about fund-raisers John Huang and James Riady, nor the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple fund-raising event led by Maria Hsia and attended by Huang and Ted Sioeng.[55]

1996 United States campaign finance controversy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Interview 1482 – The China Deception on This Week in Money | The Corbett Report

www.corbettreport.com

China's American Arsenal

China's American Arsenal — Steemit

by James Corbett corbettreport.com April 20, 2019 Have you seen the PLA Navy's latest whizzbang terror toy… by corbettreport

steemit.com

For instance, here's the Shenyang J-31, China's fifth generation stealth fighter

And here's the good ol' Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II

Or compare the Chinese Lijian Sharp Sword Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle:

To the Northrop Grumman X-47B Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle:

Or take the Sunward SVU-200 Flying Tiger unmanned helo:

And play a game of "spot the similarities" with Northrop Grumman's very own MQ-8 Fire Scout unmanned helo:

. . . but there was a reason Clinton and his cronies were never put under oath and questioned for this. The global rulers have a bigger agenda, and you are just up to your stupid partisan games. You don't want a real discussion, and you don't want to confront the REAL evidence.

 

[SmokeALib]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

Whenever traitorous leftist scum feels like it.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Clinton's lies were about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. He should have been upfront about it when he testified and he should have just ponied up the money he owed Ms. Jones. Congress had a lot of reason to be pissed at him.

The sexual relationship consisted almost entirely of blow jobs in the Oval Office. So he lied about a blow job and then the Republicans impeached him for it.

They impeached him for getting blow jobs.

Thanks.

That is such a repeated lie.
First let me say I did not support Clinton's impeachment. It was wrong.
But having said that, he did not get impeached for a blow job.
He was impeached for lying under oath, threatening and persuading others to lie under oath, and using his position to influence/silence others.

Having said that... so does two wrongs equal a right?
You want to know when is it right to impeach a President.
I will rephrase that, and ask - how do you tell when it is right to impeach a President?
When it isn't just one party doing the impeachment.

 

[SC Patriot]

Clinton's lies were about his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. He should have been upfront about it when he testified and he should have just ponied up the money he owed Ms. Jones. Congress had a lot of reason to be pissed at him.

The sexual relationship consisted almost entirely of blow jobs in the Oval Office. So he lied about a blow job and then the Republicans impeached him for it.

They impeached him for getting blow jobs.

Thanks.

Quit playing obtuse

Its a childish way of debating.

But way too many on this board do it.

He could have lied about not washing his hands after peeing. Its irrelevant. If you lie to congress you broke the law.

 

[easyt65]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

President Obama was proven to have initiated a failed coup attempt against President Trump, partially consisting of using Russian Intel Service-authored Propaganda delivered by a foreign ex-spy....illegally spying on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, political opponents, and even a newly elected President.

The evidence is irrefutable. D-Diane Feinstein exposed Barry's CIA Director's illegal spying on the US Senate. The FISA Court exposed the FBI leadership's - Mueller, Comey - FISA Court crimes and illegal spying for DECADES.

Both Impeachments carried out by the Democrats have been proven, ADMITTED, abuses of power / of the Constitutional power of Impeachments.

 

[SC Patriot]

Was it warranted for a blow job?

Let's try to have a real discussion.

President Obama was proven to have initiated a failed coup attempt against President Trump, partially consisting of using Russian Intel Service-authored Propaganda delivered by a foreign ex-spy....illegally spying on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, political opponents, and even a newly elected President.

The evidence is irrefutable. D-Diane Feinstein exposed Barry's CIA Director's illegal spying on the US Senate. The FISA Court exposed the FBI leadership's - Mueller, Comey - FISA Court crimes and illegal spying for DECADES.

Both Impeachments carried out by the Democrats have been proven, ADMITTED, abuses of power / of the Constitutional power of Impeachments.

But....But.....But......RUSSIA!