No one. They maintain their rights to due process even if they ignore a subpoena.When you tell congress to screw themselves (and totally ignore a legal subpoena) guess who the DOJ gets to screw back?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one. They maintain their rights to due process even if they ignore a subpoena.When you tell congress to screw themselves (and totally ignore a legal subpoena) guess who the DOJ gets to screw back?
Republicans used to be for "the rule of law", but then they latched onto somebody who constantly broke the law, and suddenly it was about "the man" coming down on them, just because they broke a few laws.
I need an update:
AG Holder testified and turned over more that 7 thousand documents in the phony F-n-F witch hunt. Navarro's refusal was absolute whereas Holder's was over specific documents that eventually the court forced a resolution on both parties to neither sides satisfaction.
Obviously, you don't care to revise the bovine excrement you posted equating the two?
Exactly. A true liberal is nowhere near a progressive
AG Holder testified and turned over more that 7 thousand documents in the phony F-n-F witch hunt. Navarro's refusal was absolute whereas Holder's was over specific documents that eventually the court forced a resolution on both parties to neither sides satisfaction.
Obviously, you don't care to revise the bovine excrement you posted equating the two?
Regardless of that opinion, he still cooperated with the House by testifying under oath and turning over thousands of requested documents.Holder is fckn asshole
Tell me you don't think that Trump committed nepotism?More proof that Democrats lie about everything.
And part of the due process is getting arrested.No one. They maintain their rights to due process even if they ignore a subpoena.
AG Holder testified and turned over more that 7 thousand documents in the phony F-n-F witch hunt. Navarro's refusal was absolute whereas Holder's was over specific documents that eventually the court forced a resolution on both parties to neither sides satisfaction.
Obviously, you don't care to revise the bovine excrement you posted equating the two?
Tell me you don't think that Trump committed nepotism?
I'm sure there must be a point buried within your response, but I probably won't find a shovel to dig it up.And part of the due process is getting arrested.
The courts have often held in subpoenas issued by congress, that they would prefer that the two parties negotiate a settlement, instead of putting the courts in the middle of it.Regardless of that opinion, he still cooperated with the House by testifying under oath and turning over thousands of requested documents.
Sadly, there just aren't enough of those 'true Liberals' to count.
The are dying off faster than Normandy veterans.
A detriment to America.
So? Did Trump commit nepotism?Only one of us 'thinks,' and the other is you.
Awe Stinky, how many times do you need it? Do you not remember what my answer has been every time you asked to avoid the fact that you're spreading false information?C'mon.....you know how I enjoy rubbing your ugly face in your stupidity.
I need an update:
Civil disobedience means getting yourself arrested.I'm sure there must be a point buried within your response, but I probably won't find a shovel to dig it up.
I can't think of hardly anyone whom I wouldn't vote for over the traitorous 'Benedict Donald'.
Regardless of that opinion, he still cooperated with the House by testifying under oath and turning over thousands of requested documents.
Exactly.The courts have often held in subpoenas issued by congress, that they would prefer that the two parties negotiate a settlement, instead of putting the courts in the middle of it.
The problem with Navarro, is that he absolutely refused to cooperate or negotiate in any way.