When "losing" constitutes a win for principles....

[nat4900]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Gorsuch will be a fine Justice. A lot of dem senators agreed back in 2006 when they voted to confirm him....Ears was one of them

 

[Auld Phart]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

At least he's going to get more than a participation trophy out of it, right?

 

[jknowgood]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

We got what we did because of Obama. That's what you get when you blindly follow someone.

 

[Eaglewings]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

Many of the democrats are coming up for re-election... I have read that they are going to just let things slide. Perhaps we will get some new blood who is willing to put the people first, not their own asses..

 

[Eaglewings]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

We got what we did because of Obama. That's what you get when you blindly follow someone. View attachment 110477

I am actually impressed with what Obama was able to get done with those knuckleheads in office..

 

[jknowgood]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

We got what we did because of Obama. That's what you get when you blindly follow someone. View attachment 110477

I am actually impressed with what Obama was able to get done with those knuckleheads in office..

And Trump is erasing it away, thank God!

 

[Defiant1]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

This is all bull.
You are just butt hurt because Dems were so sure Hillary had the election in the bag.
In fact you could care less about Garland because most libs wanted Hillary to appoint Obumbles to SCOTUS.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

As expected, right wingers childishly repeat that no matter what the democrats do about Gorsuch's nomination, the guy will sit on the SCOTUS because republicans have the majority......and that is probably going to happen.

HOWEVER, there is a principle that democrats' opposition will uphold. Obama was denied Garland to even have a hearing among republicans, a breach of a Constitutional tenet. This arrogance cannot be condoned by democrats turning the other cheek. Fuck that.

I'm not very happy with the current lack of "leadership" among the democrat party. Objectively, this kind of leadership has led to a blanket majority of republicans in congress, possibly the SCOTUS and a charlatan in the WH, plus 2/3 of all states' governance. ......So, the current democratic leadership sucks, big time.

Given the above, NEW leadership for the DNC will have to emerge from the bottom-up, and the heavily attended demonstrations WILL yield much more powerful leaders to take this country forward from the regressive policies of republicans.

Bottom line..... Gorsuch will be appointed with little support from the majority of voters, as we can clearly attest based on who garnered the popular vote in this last election.

If you had any principles, you wouldn't be a progressive.

You lost. Suck it.