yidnar
Diamond Member
Why isn't this question being asked??Where Did Syria?s Chemical Weapons Come From?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Iraqi general Sada claimed that they moved chems and equipment to Syria.Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Depends upon the chemical composition. The same applies to Biological. In addition storage temperature is another determining factor. Several people believe those responsible for Iraq's WMD's may have simply moved over to the highest bidder.
Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Depends upon the chemical composition. The same applies to Biological. In addition storage temperature is another determining factor. Several people believe those responsible for Iraq's WMD's may have simply moved over to the highest bidder.
i agree ,but can we be sure that the equipment and technology were not transferred to Syria ??Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Depends upon the chemical composition. The same applies to Biological. In addition storage temperature is another determining factor. Several people believe those responsible for Iraq's WMD's may have simply moved over to the highest bidder.
You're right, it does depend. I've seen reports that say as short as a few weeks and as long as a few years. But, going with the best possible scenario, that he gave them all he had the day he died, it would still be impossible for sarin to last that long.
Iraqi general Sada claimed that they moved chems and equipment to Syria.Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Depends upon the chemical composition. The same applies to Biological. In addition storage temperature is another determining factor. Several people believe those responsible for Iraq's WMD's may have simply moved over to the highest bidder.
Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Iraqi general Sada claimed that they moved chems and equipment to Syria.Depends upon the chemical composition. The same applies to Biological. In addition storage temperature is another determining factor. Several people believe those responsible for Iraq's WMD's may have simply moved over to the highest bidder.
Yeah, and yet no one was able to ever produce anyone who actually moved the WMD's,
nor were we ever able to find anyone who was involved in making them.
Apparently they were produced by magic, and moved by magic.
Even is he gave Syria everything he had before he died, it wouldn't make a bit of difference now. There is no way chemicals from Saddam's era could still be viable now. Shelf life is a reality, even for evil dictators.
Wrong.
"CIA BELIEVES THAT A SUBSTANTIAL SEGMENT OF IRAQ'S NERVE AGENT STOCKPILE CONSISTS OF BINARY CHEMICAL WEAPONS--WHICH WOULD NOTBE SUBJECT TO DEGRADATION."
Subject: SHELF LIFE OF IRAQ'S CW AGENTS
Liberals are always spouting off on subjects they are totally ignorant about.
don't know ...maybe he cut a deal with them and got screwed in the end.If he had the equipment and supplies to make chemical weapons, why would he transfer that to Syria? 1st Syria is allied with Iran, and Saddam despised Iran. Even if he loved the Syrians, the whole point of threatening with WMD'd was to keep power and hold off invasion from the US. Why would he give up the one ace he had to his enemies friend?