Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After their president chairman Bush?
USATODAY.com - NAACP in hot water over speech
Feel free.
I am sure the conservatives were in an uproar about that!
Right?
Lets face it. Conservative hate for Black people is irreconcilable. We better just prepare ourselves to fight them on all fronts. There hate has not stopped since 1865 and beyond.
Another dumbass on race....
Abraham Lincoln - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
By the 1970s Lincoln had become a hero to political conservatives[273] for his intense nationalism, support for business, his insistence on stopping the spread of human bondage, his acting in terms of Lockean and Burkean principles on behalf of both liberty and tradition, and his devotion to the principles of the Founding Fathers
By the late 1960s, liberals, such as historian Lerone Bennett, were having second thoughts, especially regarding Lincoln's views on racial issues.[280][281] Bennett won wide attention when he called Lincoln a white supremacist in 1968.[
CUKOO CUKOO...liberals are nuts
James G. Randall emphasizes his tolerance and especially his moderation "in his preference for orderly progress, his distrust of dangerous agitation, and his reluctance toward ill digested schemes of reform." Randall concludes that, "he was conservative in his complete avoidance of that type of so-called 'radicalism' which involved abuse of the South, hatred for the slaveholder, thirst for vengeance, partisan plotting, and ungenerous demands that Southern institutions be transformed overnight by outsiders
Which groups? Your reply makes no sense. The conservative groups in the recent case were designed to be political groups, and were organized under the section of the tax code that allows for politics to be their focus. The NAACP was organized as a charitable organization, and is therefore precluded from engaging in partisan politics. Even they are aware of this, as this link shows:
http://action.naacp.org/page/-/Election%20Year%20DOs%20and%20DON'Ts.pdf
I'm sure you wouldn't want churches (mainly supporting the right) to be involved in partisan electioneering; why would you defend the NAACP?
Well no..it doesn't:
Well, yes, it does:
501(c)(4) organizations are generally civic leagues and other corporations operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, or local associations of employees with membership limited to a designated company or people in a particular municipality or neighborhood, and with net earnings devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes.[32] 501(c)(4) organizations may lobby for legislation, and unlike 501(c)(3) organizations they may also participate in political campaigns and elections, as long as its primary activity is the promotion of social welfare.[33] The tax exemption for 501(c)(4) organizations applies to most of their operations, but contributions may be subject to gift tax, and income spent on political activities - generally the advocacy of a particular candidate in an election - is taxable.[34]
Contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations are usually not deductible as charitable contributions for U.S. federal income tax, with a few exceptions.[35] 501(c)(4) organizations are not required to disclose their donors publicly.[36]
501(c) organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
the auditing of one agency isn't exactly a conspiracy or controversial ...the auditing of dozens of conservative groups and then leaking info on them to liberal groups led by scum bags like George Soros is another matter !!After their president chairman Bush?
USATODAY.com - NAACP in hot water over speech
WASHINGTON The Internal Revenue Service is reviewing the tax-exempt status of the nation's oldest civil rights organization, saying criticism of President Bush at the NAACP's national convention in July may have violated rules against partisan activity.
NAACP Chairman Julian Bond says about the IRS probe: "We intend to fight this with every resource we have."
By Henry Koshollek, The Capital Times file
In a letter dated Oct. 8, the IRS said it had "received information" that NAACP Chairman Julian Bond "condemned the administration policies of George W. Bush on education, the economy and the war in Iraq" in a July 11 speech.
Feel free.
I am sure the conservatives were in an uproar about that!
Right?
Well no..it doesn't:
Well, yes, it does:
501(c)(4) organizations are generally civic leagues and other corporations operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, or local associations of employees with membership limited to a designated company or people in a particular municipality or neighborhood, and with net earnings devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes.[32] 501(c)(4) organizations may lobby for legislation, and unlike 501(c)(3) organizations they may also participate in political campaigns and elections, as long as its primary activity is the promotion of social welfare.[33] The tax exemption for 501(c)(4) organizations applies to most of their operations, but contributions may be subject to gift tax, and income spent on political activities - generally the advocacy of a particular candidate in an election - is taxable.[34]
Contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations are usually not deductible as charitable contributions for U.S. federal income tax, with a few exceptions.[35] 501(c)(4) organizations are not required to disclose their donors publicly.[36]
501(c) organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I guess you missed the part where your own link says political activity cannot be their primary activity.
These groups are allowed to to participate in politics, so long as politics do not become their primary focus. What that means in practice is that they must spend less than 50 percent of their money on politics. So long as they dont run afoul of that threshold, the groups can influence elections, which they typically do through advertising.
What is a 501(c)(4), anyway?
Lol, you mean the same ncaacp that continued a boycott on south carolina. After they got the confederate flag off the state house? Well it failed, ad they lost all creditbility after that.
And that merited an audit?
![]()
more like peanuts to coconuts .Lol, you mean the same ncaacp that continued a boycott on south carolina. After they got the confederate flag off the state house? Well it failed, ad they lost all creditbility after that.
And that merited an audit?
![]()
Whether it did or didn't, comparing the audit of the NAACP and the IRS purposefully seeking out any and every organization with the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their name is really comparing apples to oranges, is it not?
![]()
I'm sure they dressed in their finest white robes while attending the weekly cross-burning and discussed it. <-----Sarcasm intended.
Learn some history, or quit lying, the clan was all about democrats.
How about you up your 8th grade education and understand it was the southern democrats, who are now represented by the republicans. Ignorance leads to bad things and when you think like you do, you might as well be brain dead. If the Kkk was democrats why do all Kkk members align with the current Republican Party and why is the Kkk platform the same as the republican platform and also why is the south not solid blue? Get a brain you dumb fuck. I bet you can't explain or answer any of the things I just pointed out.
the on;y difference between the KKK and the NAACP is that the NAACP is able to practice their bigotry openly
. No I think you are living in the past. You guys still think bush is president most daysI'm sYure they dressed in their finest white robes while attending the weekly cross-burning and discussed it. <-----Sarcasm intended.
You do know the KKK was started by Dems ..![]()
What party would make up the KKK today? You are living in the past.
You keep making up this ridiculous unfounded shit. It's quite amusing.No, you supported the audit because you didn't like the political purpose they were using the funds for.
Go piss up a tree. Liberal hack.
It's not unfounded. You guys are totally okay with tax-exempt entities being used as funnels for campaign funds, as long as you support the candidates the money is going to.
How about you up your 8th grade education and understand it was the southern democrats, who are now represented by the republicans. Ignorance leads to bad things and when you think like you do, you might as well be brain dead. If the Kkk was democrats why do all Kkk members align with the current Republican Party and why is the Kkk platform the same as the republican platform and also why is the south not solid blue? Get a brain you dumb fuck. I bet you can't explain or answer any of the things I just pointed out.
hey dicklicker
why don't you tell us all why the NBPP, NAACP, NOI, ACP, and the eco terrorists align with the dem party?
Must suck for you That Virginia is a Blue state now![]()
After their president chairman Bush?
USATODAY.com - NAACP in hot water over speech
WASHINGTON The Internal Revenue Service is reviewing the tax-exempt status of the nation's oldest civil rights organization, saying criticism of President Bush at the NAACP's national convention in July may have violated rules against partisan activity.
NAACP Chairman Julian Bond says about the IRS probe: "We intend to fight this with every resource we have."
By Henry Koshollek, The Capital Times file
In a letter dated Oct. 8, the IRS said it had "received information" that NAACP Chairman Julian Bond "condemned the administration policies of George W. Bush on education, the economy and the war in Iraq" in a July 11 speech.
Feel free.
I am sure the conservatives were in an uproar about that!
Right?
Lets face it. Conservative hate for Black people is irreconcilable. We better just prepare ourselves to fight them on all fronts. There hate has not stopped since 1865 and beyond.