Which America Would You Like? : Pajama Boys America or Phil Robertson's America

Mack, mack, mack....when a gay man hits on a straight man, trust me, the straight guy doesn't start wondering if he himself might be gay, he feels the natural urge of repulsion.

Your deep speculation into the true sexual preferences of straight men, while laudable, are still quite laughable.

A few men think that some hairy bunghole is the way to go. Real men find it disgusting.

Yet another thing about homophobia that I find fascinating. If a gay woman hits on me, I'm no more or less repulsed than a man hitting on me who I'm not attracted to. I tell them I'm not interested and it's done with. It's just a person hitting on me that I'm not sexually attracted to, why is the fact that it's a woman instead of a man supposed to disgust me more? I don't start having fantasies about what having sex with that woman would be like just because they hit on me, do you start fantasizing about sex with men when/if they hit on you?

Why, exactly, do you spend so much time pontificating on the sexual side of a gay relationship? You seem particularly interested in male gay relationships, at that.

Some men think that larger women are the way to go. Others find it unappealing. Does that make the first type of guy disgusting?

What leads you to believe this person spends a significant amount of time "pontificating on the sexual side of a gay relationship?"

I always find it odd that anyone who discusses this topic immediately gets knee-jerk responses like, "why do you obsess...." and "why is this such a big problem for you..."


Can we not debate the point on the merits without getting into character assassination idiocy?
 
Men can be secure in their own sexuality whether it be straight, gay, zoophiliac or necrophiliac. I want to be secure that the guy isn't fucking an ass, dog or corpse.

Personally it doesn't bother me what they do as long as I don't have to pretend it's normal. Except for raping animals or children. Then they should get the death penalty.

I don't understand how you could claim that some of the men on here are comfortable in their own sexuality. I'm a woman who likes men. If another woman who likes women hits on me, that in no way affects my desire for men. I don't suddenly find myself sexually attracted to women instead. The fact that all of these "men" seem so desperately afraid of gay people, as though they think that being gay will somehow rub off on them if they're around it too much, makes me question how secure they are with their own sexuality.

and what does this incoherent idiocy has to do with your assumption that some of the men on the board are not comfortable with their sexuality?
It is much more often that those whom you assume to be men are not men at all, than any comfort with their own sexuality.
and it is certainly much more common on the left side of the spectrum.
 
do you start fantasizing about sex with men when/if they hit on you?

Men don't hit on me. I don't have the "vibe" thank goodness.

Homophobia means fear of the homo......fear is not repulsion. Straight men are repulsed by bungholers. Not afraid.

Although I know you libs think you know it all and try and put words and feelings where they don't exist. It's just how you all swing.

Just so ya know, it's long been known those who identify as homophobes are the most arroused by gay pornography. More ya bash, more we all think you're a closet case. :)

Homophobic Men Most Aroused by Gay Male Porn | Psychology Today

some BS opinion is an ultimate truth? LOL

But if one more of the leftard myths makes you feel better - who cares.

homosexual porn is not viewed by heterosexuals as it is repulsive for them.
 
My early years were spent in Phil Robertson's America. I'm happy to be in a very different America today.
Would that be the America that waits monthly for the gubernment check and food stamps?
In Phil Robertson's world? Yes. Phil said in that interview that "we were white trash". I was fortunate to be raised in a middle class family.

yet you are still ignorant beyond belief if you think there was gubmint handouts for white trash or whatever trash at the times Phil is describing.

The ignorance of the left is without borders :rolleyes:
 
So does this Phil Robertson's America include Jim Crowe laws? He sure seems to think blacks were better off then.
 
Mack, mack, mack....when a gay man hits on a straight man, trust me, the straight guy doesn't start wondering if he himself might be gay, he feels the natural urge of repulsion.

Your deep speculation into the true sexual preferences of straight men, while laudable, are still quite laughable.

A few men think that some hairy bunghole is the way to go. Real men find it disgusting.

I cannot imagine how homo-sex would smell! I guess I'm "homophobic" that way.
...Speak about something "rubbing off"...eeewwwww!
 
I think I would like to live in an America that accepts different lifestyles that don't kill, maim or hurt any other being..which also includes animals, and is united in love.

Oh. Wait. Never mind. That is Heaven.
 
Yeah, who wants to live in a society where we have equality and we make sure the sick have proper medical coverage.

You guys want to live in an America where you can revel in your homophobia, ignorance and superstition....

We want to live in an America where liberals like you don't have a foothold over discourse.
 
So does this Phil Robertson's America include Jim Crowe laws? He sure seems to think blacks were better off then.

Do you keep your head buried in the sand often?
Let me remind again what Phil was talking about. Maybe I will be heard this time, even though Phil wasn't heard at all...except the part taken out of context.

Phil worked with blacks. Hoeing the same fields. He was in the same "class" as they were, which is why he called himself white trash. White trash and blacks were in a whole different social and economic area. They were considered "worthless". So, he didn't see atrocities against blacks and the blacks he hung out with didn't bother to tell him their experiences because they were all from the "wrong side of the proverbial tracks". But go ahead and twist it all around to suit your own agenda. You are entitled to lie if it floats your boat.

Meanwhile...one of Phils grandkids..I think...or is it one of his sons? Maybe a cousin? I forget.....anyway......is BLACK. Or rather, half black.

Now ignore that bit of info so you can continue your twisting.
 
Found it. It is Willie who adopted a son...him and his wife. Biracial. So in essence, Phil's grandson is biracial.

So much for the "hates blacks" bullshit.
 
So does this Phil Robertson's America include Jim Crowe laws? He sure seems to think blacks were better off then.

Do you keep your head buried in the sand often?
Let me remind again what Phil was talking about. Maybe I will be heard this time, even though Phil wasn't heard at all...except the part taken out of context.

Phil worked with blacks. Hoeing the same fields. He was in the same "class" as they were, which is why he called himself white trash. White trash and blacks were in a whole different social and economic area. They were considered "worthless". So, he didn't see atrocities against blacks and the blacks he hung out with didn't bother to tell him their experiences because they were all from the "wrong side of the proverbial tracks". But go ahead and twist it all around to suit your own agenda. You are entitled to lie if it floats your boat.

Meanwhile...one of Phils grandkids..I think...or is it one of his sons? Maybe a cousin? I forget.....anyway......is BLACK. Or rather, half black.

Now ignore that bit of info so you can continue your twisting.

Whites in the "same class" as blacks in the south? Yea right. Do right wingers really believe their own bullshit?
 

Forum List

Back
Top