While the news was focused on Boston and Tx. House passed the Cispa

Lovebears65

Gold Member
Apr 17, 2011
6,746
2,204
THE HOUSE HAS PASSED CISPA.

WHAT IS CISPA?

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed the controversial CISPA

From the article, linked below:
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protect Act (CISPA) by a vote of 288 to 127, RT reports.

Declan McCullough of CNET details why the bill — which encourages private businesses to voluntarily share "cyberthreat information" with the U.S. government —has privacy advocates up in arms.

McCullough explains that the legislation "authorizes federal agencies to conduct warrantless searches of information they obtain from e-mail and Internet providers," meaning that allows government agencies to collect vast amounts of data from private companies.

Furthermore, the bill overrides existing privacy policies and wiretap laws, so the feds would be able to "compile a database of information shared by private companies and search that information for possible violations of hundreds, if not thousands, of criminal laws."

The House Intelligence committee contends that any claim that "this legislation creates a wide-ranging government surveillance program" is untrue.

But groups including the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation argue that the bill allows for collection of potentially sensitive such as Internet records and contents of emails which could then be used "without meaningful oversight for purposes unrelated to cybersecurity."

CISPA now heads to the Senate and could soon end up on the President Obama's desk to potentially sign into law. Earlier this week senior White House advisers recommended that the president veto the bill, citing concerns that the bill does not adequately prevent sharing of irrelevant personal information.

Read more: Congress Passes CISPA Cybersecurity Bill - Business Insider
 
My memory is that Obama endorsed the last attempt to end-run the Constitution.

He's probably already got the pens out.

--------------------

There are still pro basketball playoffs?
 
THE HOUSE HAS PASSED CISPA.

WHAT IS CISPA?

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed the controversial CISPA

From the article, linked below:
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protect Act (CISPA) by a vote of 288 to 127, RT reports.

Declan McCullough of CNET details why the bill — which encourages private businesses to voluntarily share "cyberthreat information" with the U.S. government —has privacy advocates up in arms.

McCullough explains that the legislation "authorizes federal agencies to conduct warrant less searches of information they obtain from e-mail and Internet providers," meaning that allows government agencies to collect vast amounts of data from private companies.

Furthermore, the bill overrides existing privacy policies and wiretap laws, so the feds would be able to "compile a database of information shared by private companies and search that information for possible violations of hundreds, if not thousands, of criminal laws."

The House Intelligence committee contends that any claim that "this legislation creates a wide-ranging government surveillance program" is untrue.

But groups including the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation argue that the bill allows for collection of potentially sensitive such as Internet records and contents of emails which could then be used "without meaningful oversight for purposes unrelated to cybersecurity."

CISPA now heads to the Senate and could soon end up on the President Obama's desk to potentially sign into law. Earlier this week senior White House advisers recommended that the president veto the bill, citing concerns that the bill does not adequately prevent sharing of irrelevant personal information.

Read more: Congress Passes CISPA Cybersecurity Bill - Business Insider



I think that Declan McCullough and Michael Kelly who wrote the article, should have read the bill first before reporting on it.

I don't see anything in the bill that says warrantless searches of information.
It says nothing in the bill that would override any existing privacy policies.
It strengthens the existing privacy policies.
Read it for yourselves and see if you can find anything that McCullough claims.

Bill Text - 113th Congress (2013-2014) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
 
Last edited:
THE HOUSE HAS PASSED CISPA.

WHAT IS CISPA?

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed the controversial CISPA

From the article, linked below:
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protect Act (CISPA) by a vote of 288 to 127, RT reports.

Declan McCullough of CNET details why the bill — which encourages private businesses to voluntarily share "cyberthreat information" with the U.S. government —has privacy advocates up in arms.

McCullough explains that the legislation "authorizes federal agencies to conduct warrant less searches of information they obtain from e-mail and Internet providers," meaning that allows government agencies to collect vast amounts of data from private companies.

Furthermore, the bill overrides existing privacy policies and wiretap laws, so the feds would be able to "compile a database of information shared by private companies and search that information for possible violations of hundreds, if not thousands, of criminal laws."

The House Intelligence committee contends that any claim that "this legislation creates a wide-ranging government surveillance program" is untrue.

But groups including the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation argue that the bill allows for collection of potentially sensitive such as Internet records and contents of emails which could then be used "without meaningful oversight for purposes unrelated to cybersecurity."

CISPA now heads to the Senate and could soon end up on the President Obama's desk to potentially sign into law. Earlier this week senior White House advisers recommended that the president veto the bill, citing concerns that the bill does not adequately prevent sharing of irrelevant personal information.

Read more: Congress Passes CISPA Cybersecurity Bill - Business Insider



I think that Declan McCullough and Michael Kelly who wrote the article, should have read the bill first before reporting on it.

I don't see anything in the bill that says warrantless searches of information.
It says nothing in the bill that would override any existing privacy policies.
It strengthens the existing privacy policies.
Read it for yourselves and see if you can find anything that McCullough claims.

Bill Text - 113th Congress (2013-2014) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

Here is a link that bypasses the THOMAS search:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113hr624eh/pdf/BILLS-113hr624eh.pdf

Forty pages. Downloaded but not read yet. Appreciate your reading it and posting what you found.
 

Forum List

Back
Top