Whistleblower Protection Act Does Not Apply to Ukraine Phone Call

[Bush92]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

You are allowed to report information you have heard
IG performed an investigation and found it credible

They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.

 

[jc456]

Tramp strong armed a foreign country with a history of corruption to investigate Joe Biden, his political rival.

He can strong arm a foreign country to investigate illegal actions all he wants. Whether or not it’s a political opponent is irrelevant. Running for office does not make one immune from past crimes.

NO...he can't

Executive privilege, look it up

 

[Bush92]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

You are allowed to report information you have heard
IG performed an investigation and found it credible

This is a fucking insider railroad job against a sitting President that won an election.

 

[jc456]

Extortion is a crime and an abuse of power...especially when done for personal gain.

Even more so if it concerns trying to get a foreign power to help one get elected

Joe should be locked up then? And obammy?

 

[jc456]

A

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

Have you bothered to read the complaint?
Which claims contained in that document has Trump contested?

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...leblowers-complaint-about-trumps-ukraine-call

Fuck the complaint. It’s second hand hearsay.

CREDIBLE AND URGENT

And executive privilege

 

[jc456]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

Have you bothered to read the complaint?
Which claims contained in that document has Trump contested?

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...leblowers-complaint-about-trumps-ukraine-call

Fuck the complaint. It’s second hand hearsay.

CREDIBLE AND URGENT

Not credible at all. Second hand hearsay.

Without any evidence

 

[CowboyTed]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

The Whistleblower gave plenty of first hand knowledge like the reclassifying the transcripts as top secret (this will be very hard to explain away). Also the Whistleblower is talking first hand about what White house officials said to him... That is what is being investigated...

Again impeachment is a political process not a criminal one... Conviction or Exoneration doesn't mean you are innocence or guilty... It means you keep your job or not..

 

[jc456]

They need some sort of protection or the whistleblower will be found dead of twenty five self inflicted gunshot wounds.

Why does this piece of shit need protection. He is the scum of the earth.

Why?

Spied on a sitting president

 

[Lesh]

Extortion is a crime and an abuse of power...especially when done for personal gain.

Even more so if it concerns trying to get a foreign power to help one get elected

Joe should be locked up then? And obammy?

Was Biden trying to get elected?

No?

Was Biden trying to get a corrupt prosecutor removed?

Yes

 

[jc456]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

The Whistleblower gave plenty of first hand knowledge like the reclassifying the transcripts as top secret (this will be very hard to explain away). Also the Whistleblower is talking first hand about what White house officials said to him... That is what is being investigated...

Again impeachment is a political process not a criminal one... Conviction or Exoneration doesn't mean you are innocence or guilty... It means you keep your job or not..

How? He wasn’t on the call, he can’t bring first hand anything except what he whacked off on himself. The fker is a spy and should die

 

[Lesh]

There is no Executive Privilege to commit crimes

 

[Lesh]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

The Whistleblower gave plenty of first hand knowledge like the reclassifying the transcripts as top secret (this will be very hard to explain away). Also the Whistleblower is talking first hand about what White house officials said to him... That is what is being investigated...

Again impeachment is a political process not a criminal one... Conviction or Exoneration doesn't mean you are innocence or guilty... It means you keep your job or not..

How? He wasn’t on the call, he can’t bring first hand anything except what he whacked off on himself

Try to keep up. First hand knowledge is not a prerequisite for a whistleblower complaint...which was be both credible and urgent

 

[jc456]

Another example of Democrats breaking the law. This prick needs to be exposed and prosecuted. He is a tool of the Democrats using second hand knowledge to stir shit. You can’t use “rumors” to try to impeach a President.

There is a new whistleblower act : Read and weep.
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33918.pdf

It was changed illegally. Too bad. Just saw it on TV. The new law allows contractors without first hand knowledge to make up wrongdoing. Its ridiculous.

What was illegal about the change?

They did it this August specifically to overthrow the elected President of the United States. Citizens will not stand for Democrats trying to overturn an election because they lost.

You have any evidence to support that?

We’re watching it. Hearsay evidence is hearsay evidence. Inadmissible

 

[Bush92]

On what charges? Doing a great job for the American people? If the Democrats try to go through with their coup d’tat against a free and fairly elected President...there will be blood.

You gonna kill folks to protect your Orange Criminal?

To protect liberty.

 

[jc456]

Extortion is a crime and an abuse of power...especially when done for personal gain.

Even more so if it concerns trying to get a foreign power to help one get elected

Joe should be locked up then? And obammy?

Was Biden trying to get elected?

No?

Was Biden trying to get a corrupt prosecutor removed?

Yes

He was saving his son personal on our dime. Extortion is extortion whether you’re running for office or not. Show me that statute. And trump can talk to foreign countries as part of executive privilege. Read our constitution

BTW, can you say dossier?

 

[Bush92]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

Have you bothered to read the complaint?
Which claims contained in that document has Trump contested?

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...leblowers-complaint-about-trumps-ukraine-call

Fuck the complaint. It’s second hand hearsay.

Fuck the complaint. It’s second hand hearsay.

Have you bothered to read the complaint?

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...leblowers-complaint-about-trumps-ukraine-call

"In the course of my of?cial duties, I have received information from multiple U.S.

"Government of?cials that the President of the United States is using the power of his of?ce to
solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election."

Those multiple sources can be called before congress to either confirm or deny the accuracy of the complaint. Are you worried about how that will turn out for a pathological liar who's told over twelve thousand untruths since taking office?

Fuck the complaint. Did you read the transcript of phone call?

 

[Bush92]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

Nope...FAIL

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...oints-used-discredit-whistleblower-complaint/

This really needs to be quoted.

Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.

In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.

Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”

That’s almost verbatim from the call:

TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.

Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.

Second hand knowledge...until just a few weeks ago was not admissible. Then it was changed by intelligence officials. Why?

 

[Bush92]

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw

Nope...FAIL

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...oints-used-discredit-whistleblower-complaint/

This really needs to be quoted.

Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.

In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.

Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”

That’s almost verbatim from the call:

TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.

Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.

Ok, so IF the whistleblower was a reporter, and ALMOST verbatim pretty much tells us you have a vivid imagination and trying like hell to make some bogus story fit your agenda.

Sorry, nutjob, you can't put the genie back in the bottle, this is going to be investigated.

Another attempt to “get Trump.”

 

[jc456]

Using the legislation branch of government to reverse an election. Fk that

 

[Lesh]

Using the legislation branch of government to reverse an election. Fk that

If only Republicans felt that way in the 90s huh?