Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They need some sort of protection or the whistleblower will be found dead of twenty five self inflicted gunshot wounds.
I already read it. There is no evidence in it. Let's get some actual facts from the IC IG about when those changes went into effect and what the revision of the complaint form (which means nothing in itself) entailed.BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was FiledAlso got a date this change went into affect? A revision date on the complaint form does not say anything.They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.You are allowed to report information you have heardYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
IG performed an investigation and found it credibleWho are "they"?They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago.
Got any names?
Some Trump appointees perhaps??
How do we know? Most likely leftovers from Obama years. Everyone in government is not replaced after the change of party control after a presidential election. You realize that don’t you?These changes were made by Trump appointees, right?BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was FiledThey changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.You are allowed to report information you have heard
IG performed an investigation and found it credibleWho are "they"?They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago.
Got any names?
Some Trump appointees perhaps??
You realize a Trump appointee found the Whistleblower's accusations CREDIBLE and URGENT, don't you. Congress will decide the facts in this matter, and Trump will face the consequences long before November 2020.How do we know? Most likely leftovers from Obama years. Everyone in government is not replaced after the change of party control after a presidential election. You realize that don’t you?
BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was FiledAlso got a date this change went into affect? A revision date on the complaint form does not say anything.They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.You are allowed to report information you have heardYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
IG performed an investigation and found it credibleWho are "they"?They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago.
Got any names?
Some Trump appointees perhaps??
If Trump wasn't going something wrong in the first place there would be no need for leakers. amirite or AMIRITE?Yes...this is some pretty shady stuff. Funny though...outside of Fox I never hear any news about this?There was a lot more wrong with that whistleblower's complaint than just that it was second hand information.
1. the complaint was written by lawyers paid for by Soros, it was a polished legal document, but with factual errors
2. Soros has billboards around Langley saying that they will pay for leakers and whistleblowers, i.e. make money, get Trump a two-fer.
3. Komrad Brennan likely setup the CIA whistleblower in the Whitehouse to spy on Trump
4. Rudy said that there are many errors in the Complaint, so how is it "credible"?
5. McGuire needs to stop the leaks and punish the leakers
You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLawNope...FAILYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...oints-used-discredit-whistleblower-complaint/
This really needs to be quoted.
Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.
In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.
Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”
That’s almost verbatim from the call:
TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.
Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.
Ok, so IF the whistleblower was a reporter, and ALMOST verbatim pretty much tells us you have a vivid imagination and trying like hell to make some bogus story fit your agenda.
Sorry, nutjob, you can't put the genie back in the bottle, this is going to be investigated.
So we add another "failed attempt" to your column or would you like to wait?
Second hand knowledge...until just a few weeks ago was not admissible. Then it was changed by intelligence officials. Why?You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLawNope...FAILYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...oints-used-discredit-whistleblower-complaint/
This really needs to be quoted.
Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.
In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.
Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”
That’s almost verbatim from the call:
TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.
Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.
Another attempt to “get Trump.”You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLawNope...FAILYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...oints-used-discredit-whistleblower-complaint/
This really needs to be quoted.
Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.
In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.
Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”
That’s almost verbatim from the call:
TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.
Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.
Ok, so IF the whistleblower was a reporter, and ALMOST verbatim pretty much tells us you have a vivid imagination and trying like hell to make some bogus story fit your agenda.
Sorry, nutjob, you can't put the genie back in the bottle, this is going to be investigated.
This really needs to be quoted.
Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.
In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.
Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”
That’s almost verbatim from the call:
TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.
Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.
Ok, so IF the whistleblower was a reporter, and ALMOST verbatim pretty much tells us you have a vivid imagination and trying like hell to make some bogus story fit your agenda.
Sorry, nutjob, you can't put the genie back in the bottle, this is going to be investigated.
So we add another "failed attempt" to your column or would you like to wait?
How did I fail? The whistle blower complaint is going to be investigated. I think you'll just have to deal with that.
Second hand knowledge...until just a few weeks ago was not admissible. Then it was changed by intelligence officials. Why?You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLawNope...FAILYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...oints-used-discredit-whistleblower-complaint/
This really needs to be quoted.
Talking point No. 3: The whistleblower had only secondhand knowledge
This is also true. But it’s not enough to discredit the entire complaint. If we think of the whistleblower as a reporter, the whistleblower talked to a lot of people who had firsthand knowledge.
In one key instance, we have original source material to back up what the whistleblower has alleged. So far, this person nailed the call between Trump and Zelensky. This person correctly reported nuances about how Trump not only asked about the Bidens, but asked Zelensky for help about other election-related topics.
Notably, Trump is said to have asked Zelensky to “assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm CrowdStrike.”
That’s almost verbatim from the call:
TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike ... I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
The whistleblower also talked to half a dozen U.S. officials over the course of months to put together this complaint.
Does this mean we should take everything in this whistleblower complaint as truth? No, of course not. But it’s worth noting that this person has multiple sources in the room of the president.
Sorry, dude. This is a valid whistle blower complaint and you're just going to have to deal with it. Or whine about it, you're choice.
Hahaha hahaha there it is what happened to bush then?Using the legislation branch of government to reverse an election. Fk that
If only Republicans felt that way in the 90s huh?
It is illegalSpying on a sitting president! WowNot credible at all. Second hand hearsay.CREDIBLE AND URGENTFuck the complaint. It’s second hand hearsay.Read the complaint, ClownNot credible at all. Second hand hearsay.
https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...leblowers-complaint-about-trumps-ukraine-call
"Over the past four months, more than half a dozen U.S. of?cials have informed me of
various facts related to this effort. The information provided herein was relayed to me in
the course of of?cial interagency business. It is routine for U.S. officials with
responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information
with one another in order to inform policymaking and analysis."Are you under the impression such "spying" is unprecedented or illegal?Spying on a sitting president! Wow
Butt hurt more evidenceIt is unprecedented as is the vitriolic hatred of Trump by the left when their hero Hillary was crushed in 2016.Spying on a sitting president! WowNot credible at all. Second hand hearsay.CREDIBLE AND URGENTRead the complaint, ClownNot credible at all. Second hand hearsay.
https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...leblowers-complaint-about-trumps-ukraine-call
"Over the past four months, more than half a dozen U.S. of?cials have informed me of
various facts related to this effort. The information provided herein was relayed to me in
the course of of?cial interagency business. It is routine for U.S. officials with
responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information
with one another in order to inform policymaking and analysis."Are you under the impression such "spying" is unprecedented or illegal?Spying on a sitting president! Wow
Trump will not be impeached. You can scream that until your tonsils fall out!It matters when her fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill and in the liberal press are trying to overthrow the government and overturn a free, fair, democratic, constitutional election. Deep State threat continues.
BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed
Is Pence part of that "conspiracy" dumfuk?
Because HE would be President if Trump were impeached
Still crying.....Rudy G should be disbarred, Barr and Pence should both be impeached.
, you still lost
Suppressing what votes? Show something instead of belchingNope. I wouldn’t cry about it. I would support the Constitution, admit defeat and move on.It is unprecedented as is the vitriolic hatred of Trump by the left when their hero Hillary was crushed in 2016.Spying on a sitting president! WowAre you under the impression such "spying" is unprecedented or illegal?Spying on a sitting president! WowHow "crushed" was Hillary when she won the popular vote by 3 million ballots? Wouldn't you shed a few tears if a life-long, lying POS con man used 77,000 low information trolls in three states to become POTUS at your expense?It is unprecedented as is the vitriolic hatred of Trump by the left when their hero Hillary was crushed in 2016.Where do you find Constitutional authorization for suppressing millions of votes AND accepting aid from a foreign government in pursuit of winning an election?Nope. I wouldn’t cry about it. I would support the Constitution, admit defeat and move on.
Nope , but thanks for playingThese changes were made by Trump appointees, right?BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was FiledThey changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.You are allowed to report information you have heardYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
IG performed an investigation and found it credibleWho are "they"?They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago.
Got any names?
Some Trump appointees perhaps??
Nope we caught you all red handedYou're being bamboozled.BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was FiledThey changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.You are allowed to report information you have heardYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
IG performed an investigation and found it credibleWho are "they"?They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago.
Got any names?
Some Trump appointees perhaps??
That's exactly what I said on day one of this horseshit.You must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
I have never before seen so much defending of the indefensible than with this president. It is like an entire group of people have lost their moral underpinnings.Spied on a sitting presidentWhy?Why does this piece of shit need protection. He is the scum of the earth.They need some sort of protection or the whistleblower will be found dead of twenty five self inflicted gunshot wounds.
So you don't think they were citizens
BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was FiledThey changed the criteria just a few weeks ago. Now second hand hearsay is allowable and under new guidelines the IG never had a choice.You are allowed to report information you have heardYou must have “reliable FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE” of wrong doing. This asshole heard it second hand. He does not qualify for protection under the law. Oh, that’s right, Democrats don’t care about the law. Republicans in Senate need to step-up hold hearings and get this traitors name.
Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview - FindLaw
IG performed an investigation and found it credibleWho are "they"?They changed the criteria just a few weeks ago.
Got any names?
Some Trump appointees perhaps??
Just because you found someone else who is spreading fake news, please answer my questions from the townhall article you posted.
--------------------------------------------------------
Who is the " intelligence community"?
Members[edit]
The IC is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), whose statutory leadership is exercised through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). The other 16 members of the IC are:[9]United States Intelligence Community - Wikipedia
I have to give you trampers credit, you sure do try hard to spread false info.
so lets see it, I want to see the previous version of the whistleblower complaint? (in your link)
A previous version of the whistleblower complaint document, which the ICIG and DNI until recently provided to potential whistleblowers, declared that any complaint must contain only first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing and that complaints that provide only hearsay, rumor, or gossip would be rejected.
