White-hating racists get Stormfront booted off the internet ! FIRST AMENMENT IS DEAD

[impuretrash]

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

This forum is hardly representative of the internet as a whole.

So? What does that have to do with what I said? Are you or are you not currently posting on the internet? A simple yes or no will suffice..........

A hundred or so people are on this forum.

 

[Ringel05]

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

This forum is hardly representative of the internet as a whole.

So? What does that have to do with what I said? Are you or are you not currently posting on the internet? A simple yes or no will suffice..........

A hundred or so people are on this forum.

Again, not what I asked nor is it germaine to the the question. I don't think I can dumb down the question any further so obviously can't get it down to a level you would be able to comprehend so I'll just have to repeat it again; Are or are you not currently posting on the internet?

 

[impuretrash]

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

This forum is hardly representative of the internet as a whole.

So? What does that have to do with what I said? Are you or are you not currently posting on the internet? A simple yes or no will suffice..........

A hundred or so people are on this forum.

Again, not what I asked nor is it germaine to the the question. I don't think I can dumb down the question any further so obviously can't get it down to a level you would be able to comprehend so I'll just have to repeat it again; Are or are you not currently posting on the internet?

I'm posting on USMB

 

[Ringel05]

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

This forum is hardly representative of the internet as a whole.

So? What does that have to do with what I said? Are you or are you not currently posting on the internet? A simple yes or no will suffice..........

A hundred or so people are on this forum.

Again, not what I asked nor is it germaine to the the question. I don't think I can dumb down the question any further so obviously can't get it down to a level you would be able to comprehend so I'll just have to repeat it again; Are or are you not currently posting on the internet?

I'm posting on USMB

And the USMB is found.......... where?

 

[impuretrash]

And the USMB is found.......... where?

US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Ringel05]

And the USMB is found.......... where?

US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

You're doing everything you can to not say "the internet"....... Talk about pathetic......

 

[impuretrash]

You're doing everything you can to not say "the internet"....... Talk about pathetic......

 

[Slyhunter]

Then the web site can't do it either.

Not true. Different businesses have different rules. For example, if you don't pay your rent they can't throw you out until you are 90 days late. Other rental businesses do not have to wait 90 days.

And StormCunt had a contract that specifically lists the Acceptable Use Policy. They violated that.

So that baker just needs an Acceptable use Policy listing homo's as not being welcomed there.

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

Can we discriminate against BLM members for being a hate group? Kick them off the internet too.

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

I don't understand your post. Why wouldn't I be able to post on the internet?

 

[Ringel05]

Not true. Different businesses have different rules. For example, if you don't pay your rent they can't throw you out until you are 90 days late. Other rental businesses do not have to wait 90 days.

And StormCunt had a contract that specifically lists the Acceptable Use Policy. They violated that.

So that baker just needs an Acceptable use Policy listing homo's as not being welcomed there.

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

Can we discriminate against BLM members for being a hate group? Kick them off the internet too.

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

I don't understand your post. Why wouldn't I be able to post on the internet?

Just because but don't worry about it, an idiot responded and is still responding. I have to let him dig his hole even deeper, it's funny.........

 

[Ringel05]

You're doing everything you can to not say "the internet"....... Talk about pathetic......

View attachment 148310

I'm sorry, which second grade class are you currently in?

 

[Humorme]

Then the web site can't do it either.

Not true. Different businesses have different rules. For example, if you don't pay your rent they can't throw you out until you are 90 days late. Other rental businesses do not have to wait 90 days.

And StormCunt had a contract that specifically lists the Acceptable Use Policy. They violated that.

So that baker just needs an Acceptable use Policy listing homo's as not being welcomed there.

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

You genuinely need some new material. You keep making the same old point over and over. It's been successfully countered and you've ignored the counterpoints. If this were a formal debate you would have already lost many times over.

So, unless you have a response to the counterpoints, I'm going to begin ignoring your posts.

Feel free to ignore me. That doesn't bother me at all.

I have seen nothing that counters what I said in the post you quoted.

You obviously have a reading deficiency.

 

[Humorme]

Then the web site can't do it either.

Not true. Different businesses have different rules. For example, if you don't pay your rent they can't throw you out until you are 90 days late. Other rental businesses do not have to wait 90 days.

And StormCunt had a contract that specifically lists the Acceptable Use Policy. They violated that.

So that baker just needs an Acceptable use Policy listing homo's as not being welcomed there.

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

You genuinely need some new material. You keep making the same old point over and over. It's been successfully countered and you've ignored the counterpoints. If this were a formal debate you would have already lost many times over.

So, unless you have a response to the counterpoints, I'm going to begin ignoring your posts.

You've not successfully countered it. Complaining Network Solutions' terms of service was an unconscionable contract is nothing but your opinion and does not actually establish it to be such a worthless contract. Their 'acceptable user policy' is designed to protect their liability, a standard business practice. Stormfront violated those terms and was legally justifiably terminated.

The baker had no such agreement with the gay guy looking for a wedding cake. There is no similar standard business practice designed to reduce liability. Unlike with Network Solutions, there was no justification to legally deny service.

And again, the two situations are not comparable. Stormfront violated a contract with their webhost. The homosexual did not violate any contract with the baker. You're failing miserably because you're comparing apples to oranges.

You are delusional. The case HAS been proven here and the analogies stand.

 

[Slyhunter]

So that baker just needs an Acceptable use Policy listing homo's as not being welcomed there.

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

Can we discriminate against BLM members for being a hate group? Kick them off the internet too.

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

I don't understand your post. Why wouldn't I be able to post on the internet?

Just because but don't worry about it, an idiot responded and is still responding. I have to let him dig his hole even deeper, it's funny.........

Something tells me you're the only one laughing.

 

[Humorme]

If you can force a bakery to bake a faggot cake then you should also force a webhosting site to host a white supremacist web site. Or are you a hypocrite?

It depends on the terms of the contract for the webhosting. And no, that is not a dodge.

So all the baker needs to do is create a contract for buying his cakes and he doesn't have to serve homo cakes?

I don't know. I am not sure you can discriminate via a contract.

Then what in the Hell do you call what the web host did to Stormfront? They clearly discriminated against them.

They didn't discriminate against Stormfront. Stormfront violated Network Solutions' term of service.

Your atrocious reading skills negate any and all arguments you've made. It's already been stipulated to everything you've said.

The bottom line is, you've not responded to the points I made in my rebuttal. You can pretend, until Hell freezes over that no rebuttal was made... but it has been made. You can't respond to it because you got the shit kicked out of your weak and prejudicial argument.

The only weak ass argument on this thread is to admit you don't know if it's legal to discriminate against anyone via a contract. NOTHING has been addressed regarding violating a person's Rights via an adhesion contract. Go ahead an ignore the point. You don't understand the law and are too lazy to research it.

It's all good. You threw in the towel and you're the only one (other than one other troll) too dumb to realize it.

 

[Ringel05]

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

Can we discriminate against BLM members for being a hate group? Kick them off the internet too.

Seems to me you're posting on the internet........ or is this an alternate universe.....

I don't understand your post. Why wouldn't I be able to post on the internet?

Just because but don't worry about it, an idiot responded and is still responding. I have to let him dig his hole even deeper, it's funny.........

Something tells me you're the only one laughing.

So.

 

[impuretrash]

You're doing everything you can to not say "the internet"....... Talk about pathetic......

View attachment 148310

I'm sorry, which second grade class are you currently in?

I forget what we were arguing about.

 

[Ringel05]

You're doing everything you can to not say "the internet"....... Talk about pathetic......

View attachment 148310

I'm sorry, which second grade class are you currently in?

I forget what we were arguing about.

We weren't arguing, you were furiously diggin' to China and I was laughing.........

 

[impuretrash]

We weren't arguing, you were furiously diggin' to China and I was laughing.........

What's funny is that you think I care enough about what you think to be bothered by it.

 

[WinterBorn]

Not true. Different businesses have different rules. For example, if you don't pay your rent they can't throw you out until you are 90 days late. Other rental businesses do not have to wait 90 days.

And StormCunt had a contract that specifically lists the Acceptable Use Policy. They violated that.

So that baker just needs an Acceptable use Policy listing homo's as not being welcomed there.

If they sign a contract, adding in the AUP might help. Or it might not. There is a difference between hate mongering and pushing for violence and being gay. It is illegal for a private business, open to the public, to discriminate because someone is gay.

You genuinely need some new material. You keep making the same old point over and over. It's been successfully countered and you've ignored the counterpoints. If this were a formal debate you would have already lost many times over.

So, unless you have a response to the counterpoints, I'm going to begin ignoring your posts.

Feel free to ignore me. That doesn't bother me at all.

I have seen nothing that counters what I said in the post you quoted.

You obviously have a reading deficiency.

Not at all.

 

[IsaacNewton]

So why do we allow websites that openly advocate for affirmative action, the govt mandated persecution of white men and the biggest hate crime in america.

Stormfront, internet’s longest-running white supremacist site, goes offline

aug 26 2017 Stormfront, one of the internet’s oldest and most popular white supremacist sites, has been booted off its web address of more than two decades amid a crackdown against hate sites.

The address Stormfront.org went dark on Friday, and publicly available information current lists its domain status as “under hold,” a category reserved for websites under legal dispute or slated for deletion, the USA Today network first reported.

The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a D.C.-based nonprofit group, said it was behind the effort and had successfully booted the website from its domain of 22 years by raising its concerns with Stormfront’s registrar, Network Solutions LLC, and its parent company, Web.com.

“Their website is a vehicle used to promote racially-motivated violence and hate,” Kristen Clarke, the committee’s executive director, said in a statement. “Following our efforts, Network Solutions has pulled the site. We are working across the country to combat the spread of hate crimes.”

So the storm has fizzled out and is now just a breeze blowing down a dirty ally where all the rats and cockroaches scurry about among the discarded condoms and cigarette butts.

Bitch.