White Male James Damore Goes After Google

Google CANNOT enforce it however they want. if they don't enforce it in a content neutral basis, they are violating the employment law.

Yes, they certainly can enforce their employment contracts however they want. You agree to that when you sign on the line.

So if they have a policy saying "no sex at work" and when they catch heterosexual sex acts they ignore it, but fire people caught doing homosexual sex acts, that would be OK?

But they don't. So instead of dreaming up hypotheticals, how about you deal with reality.
 
If the Google code of conduct has political motivations in their code of conduct ...their code of conduct is illegal in CA.

Then he should have gone through the proper legal channels to sue them while he was working there. Not written some ridiculous email to his colleagues.

He's only suing now because his 15 minutes of fame was fading.
Let me educate you, lover of mega corporations.

“Before being fired, Mr. Damore said, he had submitted a complaint to the National Labor Relations Board claiming that Google’s upper management was “misrepresenting and shaming me in order to silence my complaints.” He added that it was “illegal to retaliate” against an N.L.R.B. charge.”
 
If the Google code of conduct has political motivations in their code of conduct ...their code of conduct is illegal in CA.

Then he should have gone through the proper legal channels to sue them while he was working there. Not written some ridiculous email to his colleagues.

He's only suing now because his 15 minutes of fame was fading.
Another cheerleader for mega corporations.

It has nothing to do with corporations. It is basic work ethic. You can't bad mouth your employer in an email and then send it to everyone at work. You also can't spread your social and political ideologies. It's unprofessional.
Another retard chimes in.....a suit against a corporation has nothing to do with corporations NiA says.

Proof NIA is a dumbfuck libtard who spews words without knowing or thinking about what he is saying.
 
Again what was violated by stating a scientific fact?

That's not the extent of what Damore said. Did you even read his manifesto? Like everything else it seems, you are speaking out of your ass.
Quote the part of his memo that melts you snowflakes.

So...OK...so the Conservative argument has moved from he was being unfairly fired to arguing over the perception of what he said? It doesn't matter what you or I think; all that matters is what Google's HR and Legal departments -staffed with the very best Ivy League lawyers there are- think.
 
What part was violated by saying men and women are different?

Section 5.II

II. Support Each Other
We are committed to a supportive work environment, where employees have the opportunity to reach their fullest potential. Googlers are expected to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment, intimidation, bias, and unlawful discrimination.

Section 5

Outside Communications
You probably know that our policy is to be extremely careful about disclosing confidential proprietary information. Consistent with that, you should also ensure your outside communications (including online and social media posts) do not disclose confidential proprietary information or represent (or otherwise give the impression) that you are speaking on behalf of Google unless you’re authorized to do so by the company. The same applies to communications with the press. Finally, check with your manager and Corporate Communications before accepting any public speaking engagement on behalf of the company. In general, before making any external communication or disclosure, you should consult our Employee Communications Policy and our Communications and Disclosure Policy.
What part of stating scientific fact that men and women are different violated that, Dufus.

It's scientific fact that women aren't as good coders as men? Where is that established?
By the fact women don't go into those fields, moron.
 
He was asked to give input, it upset their politically correct sensibilities.

No he wasn't. He wrote that manifesto and posted it on the internal company message board. Then the memo "found" its way to Gizmodo and broader social media when Damore didn't get the reaction at Google he had hoped, and the resulting fallout led Google to fire him.

If it turns out that he is the one who leaked his own memo to Gizmodo, then that's it. He's got no legal legs to stand on.


You are a moron and I hope you're not going to be representing Google in court....because if so, they'll lose big time.

When they don't, and the judge dismisses this, are you going to screech more?
It's not going to be dismissed. Believe that.

OK...

giphy.gif
 
When is Damore and conservabrats going to realize what he did was wrong? You can't use a company email to spread your social or political views. And then on top of that he critized the company he works for.

If I did some crap like that I'd be fired within the hour.

Exactly!
Dumbasses.

“Google has long promoted a culture of openness, with employees allowed to question senior executives and even mock its strategy in internal forums. ”

Google is toast.
 
he was asked to provide feedback, and he did. he was fired for the content of it, due to his politics.

No, he was fired because his manifesto violated Google's stated Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct Damore agreed to abide by when he accepted employment at Google.

More goalpost shifting......

LOL

You're the ones who posted the quote from one of Google's chief executives explicitly stating that was the reason for Damore's termination.
 
If the Google code of conduct has political motivations in their code of conduct ...their code of conduct is illegal in CA.

Then he should have gone through the proper legal channels to sue them while he was working there. Not written some ridiculous email to his colleagues.

He's only suing now because his 15 minutes of fame was fading.
Another cheerleader for mega corporations.

It has nothing to do with corporations. It is basic work ethic. You can't bad mouth your employer in an email and then send it to everyone at work. You also can't spread your social and political ideologies. It's unprofessional.

Yes, and is in clear violation of the Google Employee Handbook and the Code of Conduct.
 
If the Google code of conduct has political motivations in their code of conduct ...their code of conduct is illegal in CA.

Then he should have gone through the proper legal channels to sue them while he was working there. Not written some ridiculous email to his colleagues.

He's only suing now because his 15 minutes of fame was fading.
Let me educate you, lover of mega corporations.

“Before being fired, Mr. Damore said, he had submitted a complaint to the National Labor Relations Board claiming that Google’s upper management was “misrepresenting and shaming me in order to silence my complaints.” He added that it was “illegal to retaliate” against an N.L.R.B. charge.”

He was terminated because he shit on the company in an internal memo, pushed bigoted and sexist views, and then found that memo -with his name attached- spread on social media.

Fuck that guy.
 
So, the black list that managers allegedly keep, to discriminate against conservatives, that is cool with you?

Sounds like a fevered right-wing conspiracy to me.

No, it doesn't, and by lying you tacitly admit that it is cool with you.


Thanks.

Yes, it is. Firstly, you use the word "allegedly"...so who is making the allegation?


If you would have seriously addressed some doubt about it, or just wanted to wait until there was proof, that would have one thing.


But you instead lied.


YOu have only to look into your own heart to know that lefties like you would abuse power to discriminate against people you hate with a fiery passion.





It is a completely credible accusation.


By lying about that, you show that you are dishonestly siding with the company, even if it is discriminating.


YOu are a bigot.

Damore broke the contract he signed when he violated the Code of Conduct he also agreed to abide by when he accepted employment.

Conservatives need to learn personal responsibility, and stop getting so emotional.


AND instead of addressing my point about your behavior,


you try to change the subject.


That is ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot refute my point.
 
What part was violated by saying men and women are different?

Section 5.II

II. Support Each Other
We are committed to a supportive work environment, where employees have the opportunity to reach their fullest potential. Googlers are expected to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment, intimidation, bias, and unlawful discrimination.

Section 5

Outside Communications
You probably know that our policy is to be extremely careful about disclosing confidential proprietary information. Consistent with that, you should also ensure your outside communications (including online and social media posts) do not disclose confidential proprietary information or represent (or otherwise give the impression) that you are speaking on behalf of Google unless you’re authorized to do so by the company. The same applies to communications with the press. Finally, check with your manager and Corporate Communications before accepting any public speaking engagement on behalf of the company. In general, before making any external communication or disclosure, you should consult our Employee Communications Policy and our Communications and Disclosure Policy.
What part of stating scientific fact that men and women are different violated that, Dufus.

It's scientific fact that women aren't as good coders as men? Where is that established?
By the fact women don't go into those fields, moron.

They do go into those fields.
 
Again what was violated by stating a scientific fact?

That's not the extent of what Damore said. Did you even read his manifesto? Like everything else it seems, you are speaking out of your ass.
Quote the part of his memo that melts you snowflakes.

So...OK...so the Conservative argument has moved from he was being unfairly fired to arguing over the perception of what he said? It doesn't matter what you or I think; all that matters is what Google's HR and Legal departments -staffed with the very best Ivy League lawyers there are- think.
Google ownership will be conservative soon.
 
He was asked to give input, it upset their politically correct sensibilities.

No he wasn't. He wrote that manifesto and posted it on the internal company message board. Then the memo "found" its way to Gizmodo and broader social media when Damore didn't get the reaction at Google he had hoped, and the resulting fallout led Google to fire him.

If it turns out that he is the one who leaked his own memo to Gizmodo, then that's it. He's got no legal legs to stand on.


You are a moron and I hope you're not going to be representing Google in court....because if so, they'll lose big time.

When they don't, and the judge dismisses this, are you going to screech more?
It's not going to be dismissed. Believe that.

OK...

giphy.gif
Lol...now this faggot thinks gifs will make him look smart. Look, Gimpy....youre a dumb fuck. Nothing you say or do will change that until you stop being a dumbfuck.

And since you are a dumbfuck, maybe that is impossible for you to do. But I hope the best for you.
 
“Google has long promoted a culture of openness, with employees allowed to question senior executives and even mock its strategy in internal forums. ”Google is toast.

Sure. But that's not what he did. He disparaged the company while stating biased and sexist views, then somehow his internal memo found its way to social media, where it resulted in public harm to Google.
 
What part was violated by saying men and women are different?

Section 5.II

II. Support Each Other
We are committed to a supportive work environment, where employees have the opportunity to reach their fullest potential. Googlers are expected to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment, intimidation, bias, and unlawful discrimination.

Section 5

Outside Communications
You probably know that our policy is to be extremely careful about disclosing confidential proprietary information. Consistent with that, you should also ensure your outside communications (including online and social media posts) do not disclose confidential proprietary information or represent (or otherwise give the impression) that you are speaking on behalf of Google unless you’re authorized to do so by the company. The same applies to communications with the press. Finally, check with your manager and Corporate Communications before accepting any public speaking engagement on behalf of the company. In general, before making any external communication or disclosure, you should consult our Employee Communications Policy and our Communications and Disclosure Policy.
What part of stating scientific fact that men and women are different violated that, Dufus.

It's scientific fact that women aren't as good coders as men? Where is that established?
By the fact women don't go into those fields, moron.

They do go into those fields.
Barely. Because it isn't what women are into.
 
Sounds like a fevered right-wing conspiracy to me.

No, it doesn't, and by lying you tacitly admit that it is cool with you.


Thanks.

Yes, it is. Firstly, you use the word "allegedly"...so who is making the allegation?


If you would have seriously addressed some doubt about it, or just wanted to wait until there was proof, that would have one thing.


But you instead lied.


YOu have only to look into your own heart to know that lefties like you would abuse power to discriminate against people you hate with a fiery passion.





It is a completely credible accusation.


By lying about that, you show that you are dishonestly siding with the company, even if it is discriminating.


YOu are a bigot.

Damore broke the contract he signed when he violated the Code of Conduct he also agreed to abide by when he accepted employment.

Conservatives need to learn personal responsibility, and stop getting so emotional.


AND instead of addressing my point about your behavior,


you try to change the subject.


That is ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot refute my point.

My behavior has nothing to do with Damore violating the terms of his employment contract.
 
Google CANNOT enforce it however they want. if they don't enforce it in a content neutral basis, they are violating the employment law.

Yes, they certainly can enforce their employment contracts however they want. You agree to that when you sign on the line.

So if they have a policy saying "no sex at work" and when they catch heterosexual sex acts they ignore it, but fire people caught doing homosexual sex acts, that would be OK?

But they don't. So instead of dreaming up hypotheticals, how about you deal with reality.

it's the same concept we have been trying to explain to you.

Would they be able to do the above or not?
 
If the Google code of conduct has political motivations in their code of conduct ...their code of conduct is illegal in CA.

Then he should have gone through the proper legal channels to sue them while he was working there. Not written some ridiculous email to his colleagues.

He's only suing now because his 15 minutes of fame was fading.
Another cheerleader for mega corporations.

It has nothing to do with corporations. It is basic work ethic. You can't bad mouth your employer in an email and then send it to everyone at work. You also can't spread your social and political ideologies. It's unprofessional.

Yes, and is in clear violation of the Google Employee Handbook and the Code of Conduct.
Google has long promoted a culture of openness, with employees allowed to question senior executives and even mock its strategy in internal forums. ”

Keep showing us how you always lie.
 
He was asked to give input, it upset their politically correct sensibilities.

No he wasn't. He wrote that manifesto and posted it on the internal company message board. Then the memo "found" its way to Gizmodo and broader social media when Damore didn't get the reaction at Google he had hoped, and the resulting fallout led Google to fire him.

If it turns out that he is the one who leaked his own memo to Gizmodo, then that's it. He's got no legal legs to stand on.


You are a moron and I hope you're not going to be representing Google in court....because if so, they'll lose big time.

When they don't, and the judge dismisses this, are you going to screech more?
It's not going to be dismissed. Believe that.

OK...

giphy.gif
Lol...now this faggot thinks gifs will make him look smart. Look, Gimpy....youre a dumb fuck. Nothing you say or do will change that until you stop being a dumbfuck.

And since you are a dumbfuck, maybe that is impossible for you to do. But I hope the best for you.

The more you screech, the less convinced I am you know what you're talking about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top