Who and How: Progressives respond

Pictured- Republican Paradise![lots of air pollution]

dear, they asked the Chinese if they wanted to go back to liberalism when 60 million slowly starved to death. 0% said yes. Do you have a picture of the 60 million starving to death too for comparison?

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?
 
Last edited:
^ a conservative/libertarian utopia. They love coal just like the USA's conservatives do.

100% stupid of course. they love living as opposed to slowly starving to death as they did under liberalism.

A liberal will actually be proud to be stupid.
 
dear, they asked the Chinese if they wanted to go back to liberalism when 60 million slowly starved to death. 0% said yes. Do you have a picture of the 60 million starving to death too for comparison?

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?

I got to spend time with a nice lady from China a couple years ago. She was amazed how clean the air in Chicago was.
 
dear, they asked the Chinese if they wanted to go back to liberalism when 60 million slowly starved to death. 0% said yes. Do you have a picture of the 60 million starving to death too for comparison?

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?

I got to spend time with a nice lady from China a couple years ago. She was amazed how clean the air in Chicago was.

10 years ago she would have starved to death in the Workers Paradise
 
dear, they asked the Chinese if they wanted to go back to liberalism when 60 million slowly starved to death. 0% said yes. Do you have a picture of the 60 million starving to death too for comparison?

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?

I got to spend time with a nice lady from China a couple years ago. She was amazed how clean the air in Chicago was.

10 years ago she would have starved to death in the Workers Paradise
Yet, there she was....
 
So before Mao, was China well off? I mean mothers insisted kids eat all on their plates so the Chinese wouldn't starve. In any case maybe the world has found a way to create sound economies, become a communist state and then allow some capitalism.
 
I dunno. From what I see China is going to start downhill; and in fact, it already has.

What this should tell all of us is...........mixing capitalism/socialism/communism doesn't work. You can't begin to create jobs and tell the people to go for it, then throw free money at people in a workers paradise. What you end up with is class envy, and people who do create something being irritated by the people who take their just labors from them under the guise of fairness.

Sound familiar?
 
I dunno. From what I see China is going to start downhill; and in fact, it already has.

exactly, they went from 60 million slowly starving to death under liberal intervention in the economy to buying more cars than we do, eliminating 40% of the worlds poverty, and a new middle class of 500 million thanks to Republican capitalism.
 
and then allow some capitalism.

100% stupid, liberal, and illiterate of course China is mostly capitalist spending only 5% of GDP on the entire social safety net.

In his new book titled Markets over Mao: The rise of private businesses in China, Lardy argues that even though SOEs still enjoy monopoly positions in some key sectors in China, such as energy and telecommunications, their role in the overall economy has diminished significantly over the years. Here are some of the facts he presents to back his thesis: in 2011, China’s state-controlled firms only accounted for about a quarter of the country’s industrial output; and their share in exports has dropped to about 11% today; in 2012, state firms were only responsible for about one-tenth of fixed investment in manufacturing. And in terms of employment, SOEs employed about 13% of China’s labor force in 2011, a dramatic decline compared with the 60% figure recorded in 1999.
 
10 years ago she would have starved to death in the Workers Paradise

so now she gets to choke to death? And be penalized $20,000 if she has a second baby.

too stupid people don't choke to death and in fact they live far longer than they ever did under liberalism and they have a brand new middle class of 500 million.

Joe's IQ is low even among liberals.
 
They didn't. Most Chinese live in abject poverty. It's why they kill themselves when they lose their slave labor jobs working for apple.

Dear, suicide rate is 13/100,000 here and only 8/100,000 in China. Its like you go out of your way to be stupid! You picked the suicide thing up from the liberal press which is always looking for childlike dupes like you. Are you proud of your liberalism?

United States is (100,000) 12.1
China is (100,000) 22.23
 
Do you have the name of the person exploiting you?

Tim Cook, CEO Apple?
Bernard Hees, CEO Heinz Ketchup
Muhtar Kent, The Coca-Cola Company, CEO

Apple is exploiting you. They buy product using off-shore monies, import them, then deduct the cost without paying tax on the original monies.
 
Do you have the name of the person exploiting you?

Tim Cook, CEO Apple?
Bernard Hees, CEO Heinz Ketchup
Muhtar Kent, The Coca-Cola Company, CEO

Apple is exploiting you. They buy product using off-shore monies, import them, then deduct the cost without paying tax on the original monies.

How does that exploit me? Besides that I don't own any Apple products????
 
dear, they asked the Chinese if they wanted to go back to liberalism when 60 million slowly starved to death. 0% said yes. Do you have a picture of the 60 million starving to death too for comparison?

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?

I got to spend time with a nice lady from China a couple years ago. She was amazed how clean the air in Chicago was.

You should have taken her to Houston, TX, she'd feel right at home.
 

Forum List

Back
Top